Global Deforestation is The Real Climate Change cause behind CO2 Increase

originally posted by: Waterglass
a reply to: Raggedyman

Documented fact the op is a lie

Documented fact what? So tell me how all of that stuff called oil was formed. Dead Dinosaurs? Nah, biomass as in trees YES! Nice try. Thanks for the links because I will add them to the list.

Thanks!

So are you saying the science is wrong and there are less trees than 35 years ago, really
An you prove it

Were their dinosaurs 35 years ago, wait what?
Ok then?🤔

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: AyinSof
a reply to: Waterglass

Then you realized that all news is fake. They write this nonsense for sales. And all media is owned by one tribe of goblins from hell.

A lot of news is sensationalized... But saying global warming doesn't exist is just putting your head in the sand.

If you want to argue it's naturally occurring, and would be happening without human impact... There is an arguement there. Personally I think it's mostly natural, but humans probably play a role considering we live in a bubble and whatever we do is mostly contained.

en.wikipedia.org...

The history of the scientific discovery of climate change began in the early 19th century.

Increasing concern, 1950s – 1960s

There's your perspective.

a reply to: AyinSof

Right... But you can study how old glaciers and ice caps are and see they're melting fast.

Again, nature does these cycles on their own ane you can study it through tree rings, soil and ice cores, and even rock.

Personally I don't think there's an arguement that we're not going through a period of climate change. There is however an arguement on whether are not it's natural or if humans are solely to blame.

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: AyinSof

Right... But you can study how old glaciers and ice caps are and see they're melting fast.

Again, nature does these cycles on their own ane you can study it through tree rings, soil and ice cores, and even rock.

Personally I don't think there's an arguement that we're not going through a period of climate change. There is however an arguement on whether are not it's natural or if humans are solely to blame.

Let me tell you 101 of what happens to earth's cyclical system of global warming then global freezing then global warming ... like day comes.. then comes the night...

its an unending cycle.

If every iceberg on earth melts and there is rise in sea level and possible extinction. It has happened before.

There will be another global freezing, perhaps millions of years, after this global warming event happens, which may take hundreds or thousands of years, possibly more.

a reply to: AyinSof

Let me tell you 101 of what happens to earth's cyclical system of global warming then global freezing then global warming ... like day comes.. then comes the night... its an unending cycle. If every iceberg on earth melts and there is rise in sea level and possible extinction. It has happened before. There will be another global freezing, perhaps millions of years, after this global warming event happens, which may take hundreds or thousands of years, possibly more.

Yes but scientists the world over are saying there is change beyond our normal cycles. You have offered no evidence to counter this.

So in truth you are simply sharing your imagination.

and peeps should listen to your imagination why?

originally posted by: highvein

originally posted by: CrazeeWorld777
a reply to: Waterglass

Said it a long time ago on ATS threads that building over everything is not the answer.

Registered: 26-9-2019

That is not that long ago.

This is a new account.... recently re-joined ATS.

originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
a reply to: Waterglass

Theres actually more trees now. So much for the carbon sink scam....wait you were saying?????



www.weforum.org...

Scientists at the University of Maryland analysed satellite pictures showing how the use of land on Planet Earth has altered over a 35-year period. The study, published in Nature journal, is the largest of its kind ever conducted.

The research suggests an area covering 2.24 million square kilometers - roughly the combined land surface of Texas and Alaska, two sizeable US states - has been added to global tree cover since 1982. This equates to 7% of the Earth’s surface covered by new trees. But what may sound like good news for the planet actually represents mixed news for the environment.

I like that article. It's a beautiful demonstration of how the earth - and NOT us - evolves to protect itself. Too much CO2.. more trees grow.
I was quite interested in the global warming story when Al Gore first came on the scene - was in one of his presentations for 2hrs. Took the time to understand that it is a hoax. Now I just laugh at those that try to pretend they know what's going to happen, or that we're the problem. They are like some crazy hooded priests from the middle ages inciting people to burn witches.

originally posted by: purplemer
a reply to: AyinSof

Let me tell you 101 of what happens to earth's cyclical system of global warming then global freezing then global warming ... like day comes.. then comes the night... its an unending cycle. If every iceberg on earth melts and there is rise in sea level and possible extinction. It has happened before. There will be another global freezing, perhaps millions of years, after this global warming event happens, which may take hundreds or thousands of years, possibly more.

Yes but scientists the world over are saying there is change beyond our normal cycles. You have offered no evidence to counter this.

So in truth you are simply sharing your imagination.

and peeps should listen to your imagination why?

Scientists claim this and that then retract their statements after few years.

For example:

phys.org...

Back in the late sixties and early seventies they used to say that if the Amazon forest was destroyed it would destabilize the weather. They said the great forests in Canada also stabilized the weather. Both are disappearing quickly.

a reply to: purplemer

Your playing twister. I am not into that game.

a reply to: TheConstruKctionofLight

So much for the carbon sink scam

Your the scam. Are you referring to 100 years ago? 500 years ago as that would be true. How did all of that oil form billions of years ago? Dead dinosaurs? How about dead biomass as in forests.

a reply to: KansasGirl

So why is it problem for you and no comments on the issue?

a reply to: AyinSof

Scientists claim this and that then retract their statements after few years. For example:

Yes science furthers itself by working on the premise of falsification. You point being what?

a reply to: Waterglass

Your the scam.

Says the whiny one who does multiple threads in the same subject

Are you referring to 100 years ago? 500 years ago as that would be true.

If you couldnt be bothered to click on the link why should I bother with you

it is my opinion as an engineer that global deforestation is the number one single root cause for the warming

Opinion and appeal to authority fallacy

And usually engineers being in the precision business have better grammatical skills

eg. Your the scam

a reply to: TheConstruKctionofLight


Am I on to something that you want kept in the box? That's my opinion based on professional articles written by adults. Did you look at the photos of earth along with the satellite pictures. Spy agencies and INTEL use satellite pictures but you don't. Why, because its your out; plausible deniability.