It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: dashen
a reply to: carewemust
Where are the awan bröthers anywho?
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: facedye
If I happened to Find Out my Sister was Ease Dropping on my Phone Calls to a Girlfriend , there would be Hell to Pay for her Act . Kennedy was Right , the C.I.A. needs to be Smashed into a Million Pieces , then Rebuilt by President Trump with a Clear Understanding and Reminder who they Actually Work for , WE THE PEOPLE Of The United States .........
The CIA actually has no purview over domestic matters. It is there for gathering foreign intelligence.
originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: facedye
The NSA records everything. Why can't we get the actually recording declassified?
What exactly was the context of the Wikileaks regarding Hillary's team?
I'll be sharing another angle on this perspective shortly, based on something that happened right before things went south with the Podesta findings - truly bizarre, and I can't wait to share it with you. Thanks for following this far along.
originally posted by: carewemust
Liberal Media is "circling the wagons", labeling any Right-Wing/Trump references to CROWDSTRIKE as a debunked-fakenews CONSPIRACY THEORY.
One Example from Today: www.forbes.com... b
This sudden media attention tells me that there is something to the working theory that Crowdstrike colluded with the DNC to tie Russia to Trump, after all. It's not a "debunked conspiracy theory". Google's involvement lends even more credence to the suspicions.
Excellent thread! S&F.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: facedye
S & F for a beautifully put-together OP.
There are so many more connections between Crowdstrike and Soros, The Atlantic Council, Burisma and the Clintons.
originally posted by: CynConcepts
a reply to: facedye
What exactly was the context of the Wikileaks regarding Hillary's team?
I'll be sharing another angle on this perspective shortly, based on something that happened right before things went south with the Podesta findings - truly bizarre, and I can't wait to share it with you. Thanks for following this far along.
Interesting thread and connecting. Good job, OP. I will keep following along, looking forward to your share you referenced above too.
originally posted by: chr0naut
I suppose that Google saw what they believed was a sure ROI and invested in yet another tech business (among the hundreds, or thousands, that they already do).
originally posted by: DJMSN
a reply to: facedye
The two whistleblowers in the Fast and Furious scandal certainly never enjoyed the protections discussed for this guy. They have been retaliated against ever since. All whistleblowers deserve protections, but our definition of whistleblowers needs to be defined. Are Assange and Snowden whistleblowers? They seem to think so
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: facedye
If I happened to Find Out my Sister was Ease Dropping on my Phone Calls to a Girlfriend , there would be Hell to Pay for her Act . Kennedy was Right , the C.I.A. needs to be Smashed into a Million Pieces , then Rebuilt by President Trump with a Clear Understanding and Reminder who they Actually Work for , WE THE PEOPLE Of The United States .........
The CIA actually has no purview over domestic matters. It is there for gathering foreign intelligence.