It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Athetos
Shooters often go for the easy victims as their time is limited, so if you can slow them down you limit casualties.
a reply to: JAGStorm
originally posted by: JAGStorm
originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: JAGStorm
Like every other building in America, schools have these things called emergency exits.
If a kid is locked in a room/hall/etc., do tell how they can use an emergency exit?
originally posted by: JAGStorm
originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: JAGStorm
Like every other building in America, schools have these things called emergency exits.
If a kid is locked in a room/hall/etc., do tell how they can use an emergency exit?
Success for the lockdown model assumes that our buildings will slow the bad guys long enough for a law enforcement response to neutralize the threat. Several incidents have now shown us this assumption is false. "No plan survives contact with the enemy.” Most of these incidents begin in contact and having more than 90 percent of a building’s occupants trained to sit on the ground, not move and be quiet (training taught in schools and then brought by students into the workplace and universities) is an exploitable tactic and illustrates the limitations of the model.
TL;DR: Exits represent choke points and choke points are easily predicted, targeted and exploited.
You do understand that a door being locked to prevent somebody from entering doesn’t mean that people can’t still use it to leave, right?
The new system will allow for global lockdown capability with panic buttons, card readers, computers or mobile devices.
Teachers will also be able to unlock classroom doors from the inside if they need to let a student inside.
Lt. Joe Hendry of the Kent State Police Department, however, believes young children should be taught to attack.
“One of the recommendations with ALICE is that we train kids to do something, like we do for a fire,” he says. “With a fire, we teach them what to do if they are trapped in a building; if they are on fire; how to evacuate. We take those same concepts and use them for active shooters.”
Hendry notes that the swarm technique taught to adults should never be used with children.
“We teach them how to run, how to throw things and how to be loud,” Hendry adds. “Those are three things kids are good at anyway. Get the room to look like a Chuck E. Cheese. If you come into direct contact [with an active shooter], you want chaos. Most bad guys aren’t highly skilled, and that chaos works in our favor.”
He also advocates children use Stranger Danger (normally recommended as a response to an abduction attempt) when in direct contact with a gunman.
As a father and recent grandfather I'm going to have to simply say that I do not agree with Mr Hendry's philosophy. Teaching kids to swarm a shooter isn't something I would personally advocate. Feeding victims to a shooter with the notion that they'll confuse and overpower the shooter seems rather irrational to me in fact.
global lockdown... that doesn't sound like something easy to just open and exit to me..
Ok, what if a student needs to unlock a door? What if the teachers aren't in the classroom, aren't these kids sitting ducks?
You can “what if” it to death. No plan is perfect, and no plan is going to be executed perfectly. No plan is going to stop 100% of casualties 100% of the time.
It would also naturally limit the shooter
A shooter walking into one classroom and then crossing a patch of grass to another classroom isn’t any different than a shooter entering one classroom and walking down a hallway to another classroom, except one is outside and the other isn’t.
Kinda like leaving him locked in a tiny room at the front of the school would? Weird.