It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In "Diana: Case Solved" by journalist Dylan Howard and former homicide cop Colin McLaren, out now via Skyhorse Publishing and Start Publishing, the co-authors sit down with Le Van Thanh for his first-ever interview on the subject, despite multiple requests over the years to share what he knows from that fateful night.
“That’s why I let them think what they want.” Of all the words spoken by Le Van Thanh during our confrontation with him, these are the ones that most haunt me personally. Van Thanh knows he is a pawn. He knows that there are powerful forces capable of destroying his life. And he is not insane. In this simple line quoted above, Le Van Thanh is telling us that he cannot do other than what he has done. He must allow the public to believe what they will, because the alternative is unthinkably dangerous. Will he be killed for speaking the truth? Will his family? Will he find himself the victim of an “accident” just like Diana’s?
It is also outrageous that a man should be telling us—pleading with us, really—to understand his situation in a certain way. . . and to have the institutions of the world turn a deaf ear. Even if Le Van Thanh wished to tell us the truth, he feels that he cannot. Surely this fuel demands for a new inquest to be opened on the tragic death of Princess Diana.
That is exactly the feelings of Mohamed Al-Fayed, who through his lawyer, Michael Mansfield QC, told our investigation that if it can now be shown Le Van Thanh was driving the white Fiat Uno, there is a genuine case to be made to reopen the inquest: There is a real question mark here because the French authorities were particularly anxious to ensure that it was blamed to the paparazzi. That’s why they were all arrested to begin with. He (Le Van Thanh) had the car resprayed. It is very suspicious. If it’s him in the tunnel—if it’s his Fiat—whether it was an accident or whether he was trying to get in the way. I have no idea. The Mercedes obviously did hit the Fiat. Whether that was an accident by the driver driving too fast into the tunnel or whether the Fiat Uno was in the wrong lane, I can’t take it beyond that. I don’t know what part the Fiat Uno played other than it obviously had a role as a vehicle that was there. But whether the driver did this deliberately or not obviously, and what his background is, and why, all the rest of these other questions are in the same league as the [James] Andanson story.
originally posted by: Plotus
She was after all, an outsider, born Diana Frances Spencer. Much easier to eliminate, not blood...
originally posted by: Creep Thumper
Diana predicted how and by whom. I don't think we'll get any more convincing evidence than that.
She was murdered. Period.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: PraetorianAZ
There was also a rumor that she was expecting another child.
originally posted by: Plotus
She was after all, an outsider, born Diana Frances Spencer. Much easier to eliminate, not blood...
originally posted by: angelchemuel
originally posted by: Plotus
She was after all, an outsider, born Diana Frances Spencer. Much easier to eliminate, not blood...
She was Lady Diana Spencer and her heritage goes way back to the Jacobeans who many would argue have a right to the throne. She was more royal than the Queen Mother who disliked Diana with a passion because Diana was of Royal Blood.
Rainbows
Jane