Booker, Dems want Kavanaugh impeached w/ no evidence; ignore Bookers admitted worse sexual assault

a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

I feel you are falling for propaganda

Even with something so heinous as this story, your take is “whelp both sides do it so no big deal”

No the other side hasn’t done anything Like this
The media and Dems smeared and calling for removal over allegations with zero proof

Show me the media going after any dem line this

Why aren’t the media going after booker of both sides do it?

Corey Booker has admitted to sexually assaulting someone in the past. So where are the Dems demanding that he resign or be impeached? There aren't any. They don't care.

But allegations against a conservative surface, and despite them being so hokey that even the alleged victim doesn't remember any such thing happening, they're calling for his impeachment.

a reply to: Grambler

Oh yeah? What outlet do you see saying what I say? Point me in the direction of the propaganda I fall for.

By the way, I'm pretty sure this thread is evidence of you doing what you are accusing me of doing. Your whataboutism is noted and logged. Me pointing out reality is not me saying it's fine.

Why aren’t the media going after booker of both sides do it?

I guess you completely missed my first post in this thread? Read it again and you'll see why I think they don't talk about it.

a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

Yes I know your stance

Its all you ever post.

We shouldn't talk about any obvious abuse by anyone, because that's us failing for the medias division.


Meanwhile its ok for you to parrot the media when you do things like criticize trumps tax cuts.

You constantly parrot the media and attack trump, then when others criticize the media or intel communities or dems, you say they are parroting the media.




SO yes we get the point.



We are allo bad people ffalling for the medias division for pointing out the medias and dems like bookers hypocrisy.


The only way to not fall for the medias evil scheme is to be silent about their hypocrisy.


As always, I enjoy talking to you, but feel bad you are duped so and a hypocrite.

a reply to: Grambler

The media doesn't dictate what I care about, maybe in your world anyone who criticizes Trump automatically got it from the media but in the real world that's not how it works. People are allowed to come to their own conclusions without the help of the media. I know, crazy right?

Show me where CNN calls itself a propaganda outlet whose main purpose is to agitate and provoke? Otherwise your accusation that I'm falling for propaganda is nothing more than hot air.

No one said to be silent, not sure where you got that idea from. My stance is constantly being misconstrued, not surprising seeing as the media and president have forced people into their black and white stances with no room for any gray in between.

a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

Show me where me painting our deep state corruption or stories like this about Booker are driven by the media

This is ten hypocrisy I am talking about

When you say something that media outlets are also saying, you think it’s fine because you are smart and independent and cane up with it one your own

Yet you make post after post accusing so many other people of just parroting the media or falling for their division

Why don’t you give them the same benefit of the doubt that you reserve for yourself?

But L-e-l-a-n-d !!!!! 🤣🤣🤣


Christine Blasey Ford’s friend now says she’s skeptical of Kavanaugh accusation

A high-school pal of Brett Kavanaugh accuser Christine Blasey Ford says in a new book that she’s skeptical of Ford’s claim the Supreme Court justice sexually assaulted her at a party in the 1980s.

“I don’t have any confidence in the story,” Leland Keyser — who Ford has said was at the party where the alleged assault occurred — told two New York Times reporters in their book “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation.”

“Those facts together I don’t recollect, and it just didn’t make any sense,” Keyser insisted of Ford’s account, according to authors Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Grambler

The rules for us are; if we do something wrong, we're punished.

Actually, the rules for us are; if we don't do something wrong, the left can make up something and then punish us.

a reply to: Grambler

You're under the impression that I'm only talking about the mainstream media. Nope, I'm talking about the alternative media as well. They are two sides of the same coin. Easy mistake to make honestly. You reference the media for your threads all the time.

a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

Sure I guess I’m part of the alt media

You too; you post in an online forum

Explain again how that’s significant?

Are we corrupt agents of the establishment as well?

Why is it ok for you to parrot the msm again and it’s actually you independently thinking, but when other people call out the establishment they are buying in to media division?

a reply to: Grambler

Why do you think anything pro-Trump is not funded by the establishment? It's just as funded by the establishment as the mainstream. Controlled opposition, they all have the same people in their back pockets.

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: Grambler

Why do you think anything pro-Trump is not funded by the establishment? It's just as funded by the establishment as the mainstream. Controlled opposition, they all have the same people in their back pockets.

As usual you can gnome answering any of the questions about your hypocrisy

Yes I know we have gone back and forth about your theory that everyone that could ever be elected is part of the establishment

Pure nihilism, I get it

So I suppose that means you feel Hillary committed no crimes, there was no fisa abuse, comey did nothing wrong, etc

All just lies funded by the establishment, those clever devils

a reply to: Grambler

Hillary is in the same exact boat as Trump. Years long investigations that led nowhere. What's good for the goose is good for the gander. They're all criminals and hypocrites who work for the establishment. Nothing more than bread and circus to keep people preoccupied with things that will change absolutely nothing. I'm waiting to be proven wrong, it's been 3+ years.

I'm not a nihilist, I just choose to have hope in things other than politics and politicians. You can continue to ignore history in lieu of false hope but I choose reality.

a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

I’m waiting for you to address any of the pints I bring up to you over and over again

Meanwhile I don’t know if trump will end up any different

I know his election has not epunlicly outed the deep state media corruption

I know the law was broken by the Obama admin to spy on trump and it’s the biggest political scandal in the history of the country

And I know you are a great asset to the corrupt establishment by constantly arguing anyone pointing out this corruption is buying into media division




And what’s worst of all, you think you are anti establishment while you parrot the establishment media’s attacks on trump

I’ve been saying this for over a year, and I’m still waiting to be proven wrong

a reply to: Grambler

I've addressed your points, you just don't like my answers.

And me being an asset for the media? I think you overestimate my worth. Lol.

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: Grambler

I've addressed your points, you just don't like my answers.

And me being an asset for the media? I think you overestimate my worth. Lol.

From above.


Why don’t you give them the same benefit of the doubt that you reserve for yourself?



Why when you parrot the media is it you being independent, but anytime anyone else says something they are falling for media division?



As far as you being an asset, you don’t have to be a powerful or willing one

But your argument helps them

a reply to: Grambler

What do I parrot from the media? I don't watch the media and then parrot what they say because I DON'T WATCH THE MEDIA. What don't you understand about that? Many on ATS LINK TO THE MEDIA constantly and use their articles as a source, I do not.

Not sure what you're not understanding about that. I can't help the fact that the media is so large and diverse that their talking points sometimes overlap my own opinion. You do not see me linking to the media do you? You don't see me parroting the media, you see me giving my own personal opinion in spite of the media. Get it?

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: Grambler



Not sure what you're not understanding about that. I can't help the fact that the media is so large and diverse that their talking points sometimes overlap my own opinion. You do not see me linking to the media do you? You don't see me parroting the media, you see me giving my own personal opinion in spite of the media. Get it?

And this is the hypocrisy

So your opinions are all your own

You aren’t falling for the media’s division

But everyone else, every time we post we are falling for the media’s division

It can’t be we just have our own opinions others share

Do you see the hypocrisy yet?

a reply to: Grambler

If you buy into the narrative, that everything happening in Washington and the media is natural and organic and not set up to divide us from both sides of the aisle, you are buying into the propaganda. Plain and simple, you refuse to see it.

If you choose a side you are part of the problem. I don't choose a side, I see through the charade. The status quo continues behind the curtain despite what the actors in the spotlight are doing.

Guess what, I'll be saying the same thing when the next Democrat gets into office. I don't think you could say the same, you have bought into the narrative and have chosen a side.

a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

Yep

So me calling out corruption from the fbi and media is buying in to the media’s division

You talking about trumps tax cuts being bad like 90 percent of the media, that’s seeing through the charade.