More Evidence of Russian Collusion

Welp, the collusion with Russia keeps getting deeper and deeper.

Just before leaving office, Obama helped the Russians to find American intelligence sources within Russian. The manufactured Obama propaganda machine at CNN did what good progressives do and placed the blame on its opposing political foes.

www.theblaze.com...

The cable outlet (CNN) claimed the exfiltration (of American Intel Assets in Russia) was made in response to Trump sharing sensitive intelligence with top Russian officials

The truth, that the progressive propaganda outlet CNN deliberately misconstrued, is that:

the CIA sought to extract the asset in 2016 — prior to Trump becoming president — over exposure concerns after top U.S. officials in the Obama administration "revealed the severity of Russia's election interference with unusual detail."

The level of detail Obama released publicly exposed assets in Russia, as those details were only known by a few people within Russia. This would make it easier for Russia to grab up and imprison our assets, so the CIA had to start the process of the extraction of assets in Russia. The bottom line is that Obama directly helped Russia point out American intelligence assets in Russia; and Obama's propaganda arm followed up by blaming Trump for it.

The Obama administration and the DNC during Obama's tenure has been caught on multiple occasions colluding with Russia. The Fake News progressive propaganda outlets have been caught on multiple occasions blaming everyone but the very progressives responsible for collusion.

Actual lives are at stake and the propaganda agents and their political bosses could care less as their ends justify their means.

Sickening.

It was a good setup attempt but it's been exposed now 😎

a reply to: GenerationGap

The CIA issued a statement last night that essentially called CNN an anti America terrorist organization masquerading as a news Outlet.

After CNN helps President Trump win re-election, the government should shut them down.

Here comes another 50+ flag front page thread from "the blaze". Wonder how far this will go? About as far as the collusion delusion I'd wager. Fake news is bad unless it's from a select few propaganda sites apparently. The blaze is the height of fair and balanced reporting, about as much as CNN or MSNBC. Two sides of the same coin.

"Witch hunt!" Who's with me? 🤣

a reply to: carewemust

After CNN helps President Trump win re-election, the government should shut them down.

Excellent idea...

We should also establish an agency that monitors media outlets to make sure they're "approved".

Maybe we can get a list of government approved talking points.

a reply to: CriticalStinker
Ministry of Truth perhaps?

We know that no one ever seizes power with the intention of relinquishing it. Power is not a means; it is an end.

a reply to: GenerationGap

Is this another "undisclosed source"?
Or someone "on the inner circle"?

I need more proof than a Glenn beck website

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: CriticalStinker
Ministry of Truth perhaps?

We know that no one ever seizes power with the intention of relinquishing it. Power is not a means; it is an end.

I like it, it sounds like an agency that would look out for the best interest of Americans.

Although, it can't be one of those empty power arms, they'll need to have some backbone. We'll need to provide them with vans to make sure citizens aren't listening to the wrong international radio stations. Maybe get the NSA to keep tabs our citizens are visiting the right websites.

a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

www.nytimes.com...

Happy? Media apparently endangered the asset and had to exfiltrate.

But when intelligence officials revealed the severity of Russia’s election interference with unusual detail later that year, the news media picked up on details about the C.I.A.’s Kremlin sources. C.I.A. officials worried about safety made the arduous decision in late 2016 to offer to extract the source from Russia. The situation grew more tense when the informant at first refused, citing family concerns — prompting consternation at C.I.A. headquarters and sowing doubts among some American counterintelligence officials about the informant’s trustworthiness. But the C.I.A. pressed again months later after more media inquiries.

a reply to: CriticalStinker

You're not a fan of "Hard Harry"?
People will just dismantle a radio station and attach it to an old jeep, creating a mobile transmitter so its position can't be triangulated.

People don't like Glenn Beck, AKA theblaze.com, OK.

Do you like Fox News?

www.foxnews.com...

CIA slams CNN's 'misguided' and 'simply false' reporting on alleged CIA spy's extraction from Kremlin

Maybe you'd rather give advertising money to the NY Times...

www.nytimes.com...

But the government had indicated that the source existed long before Mr. Trump took office, first in formally accusing Russia of interference in October 2016 and then when intelligence officials declassified parts of their assessment about the interference campaign for public release in January 2017. News agencies, including NBC, began reporting around that time about Mr. Putin’s involvement in the election sabotage and on the C.I.A.’s possible sources for the assessment.

Or maybe you prefer the folks with the Batman tagline of Democracy Dies in Darkness?

The Washington Post

The exfiltration took place sometime after an Oval Office meeting in May 2017, when President Trump revealed highly classified counterterrorism information to the Russian foreign minister and ambassador, said the current and former officials, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive operation.

That disclosure alarmed U.S. national security officials, but it was not the reason for the decision to remove the CIA asset, according to the current and former officials.

Personally, I've come to like TheBlaze. They generally wait longer to publish and provide multiple sources, and unlike other new publications get it right the first time. Maybe that's why it's a growing source found on the ATS front page lately...

a reply to: shooterbrody

Nothing sending a few people to re-education camps as an example can't fix.

We need to set a tone. Too many people are making noises with their face holes, and I simply don't like it. They keep doing things I disagree with, and more importantly my party disagrees with.

a reply to: GenerationGap

No, I don't like the blaze as "the" source.
I would rather your op have contained several sources to go along with the blaze.

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: carewemust

After CNN helps President Trump win re-election, the government should shut them down.

Excellent idea...

We should also establish an agency that monitors media outlets to make sure they're "approved".

Maybe we can get a list of government approved talking points.

How about we do one better and reverse Obama's bullsh@t law change that let's media spew propaganda and lies?

Oh,that's right it would be communism if there was oversight- but it's not communism if it's legalized propaganda and lies.

Wherever your drinking water source is, you should probably have it tested...

a reply to: CriticalStinker

Too many people are making noises with their face holes, and I simply don't like it.

misophonia?
www.medicalnewstoday.com...

No specific medications or treatments for misophonia have been found yet. Mimicking offensive sounds is an unconscious response some people have to the sounds that trigger their condition. This mimicry may enable them to handle the uncomfortable situations they find themselves in better.

may I suggest:
Prayer for Beneficial Attributes

Monster grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the strength to change the things I can, and the Noodle to know the difference.
RAmen

-NoodleNet

a reply to: shooterbrody

Monster grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the strength to change the things I can, and the Noodle to know the difference.
RAmen

😂

A man of culture I see.

a reply to: Notoneofyou

How about we do one better and reverse Obama's bullsh@t law change that let's media spew propaganda and lies?

If we do that, how will the government protect our minds and give us proper thoughts?

Sounds suspiciously dangerous if you ask me.

Like carewemust said, we need to shut CNN down, it's the only way (after the election of course )

originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: GenerationGap

No, I don't like the blaze as "the" source.
I would rather your op have contained several sources to go along with the blaze.

Can't please everybody, but one can only do their best. See a couple posts above. I believe all of those sources validate, yet again, TheBlaze.com's reporting.

So many Goldilocks round these parts, but I'll try to provide the right porridge, though it may take time as ATS can be a rather picky bunch.

Anyhow, what's your thoughts on even more Obama news of his administration benefitting Russian efforts while subverting the American position in the world? Think it was deliberate? Think this is what he meant about being a better friend to Putey Poot Poot after the 2012 election? Or do you think it is just Obama being an I'll suited mentally deprived Commander in Chief that wasn't fit for the office? At this point it's either one or the other, and I'd like your opinion on the matter rather than being a baby crying about your porridge being not the right temperature.

a reply to: GenerationGap

Good luck.

CNN says it's Trumps fault (big surprise)
TheBlaze says it was Obama's (big surprise)
The CIA claims it never happened (probably doesn't want to admit they had a Russian asset or look embarrassed, again, big surprise)

Sounds like a whole bunch of people playing political football with this one.

a reply to: GenerationGap

Well a couple things.
The blaze is a sketchy source and you should have put more links in the original op.
They have a bad record for fact checking and are right biased.

And I always felt Obama was not qualified to have the job and his leadership proved me right. He likely had no clue what was going on.
So it's either deliberate or incompetence.
Neither would surprise me.