It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Swedish behavioural scientist Magnus Söderlund has suggested that eating other people after they die could be a means of combatting climate change.
Söderlund is not alone in his call to reject the taboo of cannibalism. Last year, noted atheist and evolutionary scientist Richard Dawkins advocated for lab-grown meat and suggested it may be used to “overcome our taboo against cannibalism”.
Psychologists Jared Piazza and Neil McLatchie of Lancaster University also questioned the taboo on cannibalism in an article for Newsweek last month but ultimately did not endorse breaking it.
originally posted by: operation mindcrime
a reply to: The2Billies
Don't be so so.....conservative!!
Of course you had to bring in fetusses and abortion but pound for pound they aren't going to make a big dent in this scenario.
Now those 400 pounders that roll though Wallmart...hell yes!!
Cool idea...
originally posted by: Quantumgamer1776
a reply to: The2Billies
And what about all the medical issues that show up in cannibals? Are we supposed to just ignore the morality and health issues involved with eating people so we can feed more living people with people that are already dead? How would feeding more of the living with the already dead solve climate change?
Am I missing something there?
originally posted by: The2Billies
I suppose next environmentalists will endorse milking factories for willing women to earn a little cash. Then we can stop "sexually assaulting" cows against their will as PETA demands.
I can't imagine that happening, as that's BLATANT sexual discrimination against men /s
I suppose next environmentalists will endorse milking factories for willing women to earn a little cash. Then we can stop "sexually assaulting" cows against their will as PETA demands.
I can't imagine that happening, as that's BLATANT sexual discrimination against men /s
originally posted by: The2Billies
Looks like something Alexandra O. Cortez would approve of, she wants to eliminate cows in the world.
I suppose next environmentalists will endorse milking factories for willing women to earn a little cash. Then we can stop "sexually assaulting" cows against their will as PETA demands.
AOC and others are already demanding we stop milking cows. To get cheese, yogart, sour cream, etc,, under this new and improved paradigm, we milk willing human females who won't need an education or brain to sit around all day getting milked. Brilliant solution to female poverty; or approved job if only females work in milking factories in countries that cloister females indoors and don't allow them out unescorted.
The evils of the world keep growing exponentially in the name of progressive/liberalism and their worship of environmentalism.
Now we know what to do with aborted fetal tissue and aborted babies, eat them in the name of saving the environment.
Already there have been cases of euthanasia where people held down struggling people who had earlier signed papers they wanted euthanasia.
What happens when grandma is worth $5.00 a pound? and really tender fetal tissue is worth $$$ an ounce or more?
originally posted by: Quantumgamer1776
a reply to: The2Billies
And what about all the medical issues that show up in cannibals? Are we supposed to just ignore the morality and health issues involved with eating people so we can feed more living people with people that are already dead? How would feeding more of the living with the already dead solve climate change?
Am I missing something there?