It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by theyushua
i liked what mrwupy said. ( sorry i dont know how to do quotes)
Any and everything you read or hear about God is just an opinion.
end quote
(now, because I was showing you the format, when I post this, the words inbetween the two "quotes" will come out looking just like the quotes you see.
the whole post of the person you are quoting
and [/quote" to it.
Hope that helps.
Originally posted by e 2 e k 1 a 7
The bible is nothing more then a theory, just like evolution is a theory, no one knew how we got here, so Darwin thought about it and came up with evolution just as people came up with God.
Originally posted by SomewhereinBetween
Thre is no getting around the scientific aspect og Genesis one through two.
Theory of the universe's existence: and the Lord said.
Theory o fman's existence: And teh Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground.
Theory of our knowledge and length of life: trees.
Theory behind God's existence, all of above and well into Deuteronomy.
The rest is all political then historial.
Originally posted by SomewhereinBetween
Thre is no getting around the scientific aspect og Genesis one through two.
Theory of the universe's existence: and the Lord said.
Theory o fman's existence: And teh Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground.
The creation theory is not science, it is a blatant attempt to avoid science.
Originally posted by Mahree
You do have a point there and I have believed it all my life. The "Creation Theory" that cannot be taught as science facts in public education institutions.
the two most important chapters of the good book without which the rest would be absolutely meaningless in the great scheme known as religion.
A very small part of the Bible. Couple of chapters? To us who believe in the Bible, a couple of very important chapters. That hardly makes the other 1500 and some odd pages a scientific paper.
I have no idea what this living person calling themself saint, suggested, nor do I care. And if what bothers me?
If it bothers you so much why don't you do as Saint4God suggested and file it with the other outdated science?
Originally posted by SomewhereinBetween
Originally posted by Mahree
You do have a point there and I have believed it all my life. The "Creation Theory" that cannot be taught as science facts in public education institutions.
by SomewhereinBetween: The creation theory is not science, it is a blatant attempt to avoid science.
by Mahree: A very small part of the Bible. Couple of chapters? To us who believe in the Bible, a couple of very important chapters. That hardly makes the other 1500 and some odd pages a scientific paper.
by SomewhereinBetween: the two most important chapters of the good book without which the rest would be absolutely meaningless in the great scheme known as religion.
Originally posted by southern_cross3
Your entire point is based on a joke. You state that it makes sense by merely setting religion aside to look at the issue--um, duh.
Murder makes sense when setting aside morals. Psychotic behavior makes sense when setting aside common sense. Your theory makes sense when setting aside religion.
In other words, bullcrap. The Bible is not scientific and can't be looked at scientifically. It is a matter of faith--if you don't have enough, then naturally the Bible won't reveal itself to you.
Originally posted by CyberKat
Originally posted by theyushua
i liked what mrwupy said. ( sorry i dont know how to do quotes)
Any and everything you read or hear about God is just an opinion.
end quote
When I first signed up, I didn't know how to do "quotes" either. It bothered me, when it seemed so easy for everyone else. So, I finally just asked, and got plenty of helpful responses. Now, I guess it's my turn to try to help.
:
Originally posted by theyushua
anyway,
don't they (being the scientific community) have proof of evolution? i thought they did.
Originally posted by theyushua
and doesn't dinosaurs totally contradict (i think i spelled that wrong) the bible?
Originally posted by theyushua
genesis is more of a story than a theory. most things in the bible are contradicted (again, i think its wrong) by modern science.
Originally posted by theyushua
they do don't they? wouldn't all of the periods ( jerassic, mezzoic) interfere with the 5 days in which god created the earth?
Originally posted by shaunybaby
* Buddha was born of the virgin Maya, who was considered the Queen of Heaven.
* He was of royal descent.
* He crushed a serpent's head.
* He performed miracles and wonders, healed the sick, fed 500 men from a small basket of cakes, and walked on water.
* He abolished idolatry, was a sower of the word, and preached the establishment of a kingdom of righteousness. He taught chastity, temperance, tolerance, compassion, love, and the equality of all.
* He was transfigured on a mount.
* Buddha was crucified in a sin-atonement, suffered for three days in hell, and was resurrected.
* He ascended to heaven.
* Buddha was considered the Good Shepherd", the Carpenter, the Infinite and Everlasting.
* He was called the "Saver of the World" and the "Light of the World.