Why does the elite want to weaken the family unit?

originally posted by: CthruU
a reply to: CmdrShep2154

So many parents are poor because the gov is negligent not just in USA but everywhere.

The negligence lies in the fact that to this day - anyone can breed as often as they like and generally the lower classes are prolific breeders for millions of reasons.

The family unit is breaking down bigtime but not from "the elite" but from within itself as individuals sense of value towards family units evaporates through priorities deprivation and self entitlement.

That is is true to some extent as families in need say in the early decades of the 1900s had several generations living together in one home where the sharing of expenses made living easier. I also read somewhere that even in Ireland men did not leave their parents' homes until there were aged in their 30s, perhaps to amass wealth to afford to marry(?), I am not sure if that was the reason, or perhaps cultural.

I think these days the need has arisen again because the younger generations simply can't make it out there and have to move back to the parental home or double/triple up with friends/strangers in one home to be able to make it.

Perhaps these recessions and depressions should teach us that the system just does not work for all, never has, never will.

The agenda is based on you VOLUNTARILY SURRENDERING THINGS......they do not want People to happily accept positive established roles...they do not want us to connect happiness to each other and to normal functioning Nuclear Family dynamics....they want us to voluntarily blur the lines for ourselves by slowly turning away from the Nuclear Family and accepting all kinds of weird crap like this QLGP or whatever the current Gender assassination trend is calling themselves....and they want us to settle for ANYTHING BUT THE NUCLEAR FAMILY.....they have made gender assassination a very well paying profession now a very well paying way to be...….these once small special interest groups have now expanded and they are no longer small they are in fact working together to set trends and run the Country from behind the scenes in as broken role free gender confused way as they can possibly manage.

In Canada there is now pushback especially in Schools which were being overrun by gender confused Teachers due to the fact that the gender assassination coalition targeted Teachers profession and then flooded it with their members (so they could hide there and not ever be challenged) long ago to weaponise their influences....these Teachers were actively pushing for and furtively embedding a specific set of rules that support the proliferation of gender assassination groups they were using all of their clout including Union power.....just recently there have been massive changes that have disenfranchised this group from dictating or in any ways influencing such matters in Schools on any level.

Yes some small special interest groups have monopolised certain Industries and Professions.

The City I live in recently stopped allowing a Pride/Gender Assasination Parade....all Civil Employees who HAD BEEN ATTENDING were forbidden from attending the alternative celebrations set up in defiance as official representatives of their Profession...our soon to be turfed Mayor still showed up to these alternative options but none of the Employees he rules over were allowed to show up.

Getting the wicked works out of our Schools...check.

Stopping Politicians from benefitting from social dischord by endgendering support for small special interest groups thru weaponizing social values and norms by encouraging and supporting attendance to group ctivities by paid Civic Employees and by showing a completely biased support for this particular small special interest group that holds immense business and political clout due to decades and decades of weaponizing the groups themselves fiscally...check.

Its time to start working at having laws supporting these gender assassination groups repealed soon...there is much work to be done to fix this societal ill.

They do not want to see us building healthy happy Families and have thrown trillions of dollars in the kitty to prevent it.

a reply to: SteamyJeans

OMG the mantra of the progressive liberals!

Destroy morality by claiming it is moral to whore around with anyone, while claiming heterosexuality as deviant and mean/evil to those who aren't.

Destroy ones roots by saying that anyone who celebrates the roots of another is cultural appropriation and racist, thereby making celebrating ones roots acceptable to smaller and smaller groups - can't invite anyone outside ones own roots, eventually making it impossible to celebrate.

Destroy history by making people so ashamed of it that they demand destruction of anything that might remind people of real history. (Statues/Art/censoring content online)

No God, by making the one religion that has in it's scriptures the permission to lie to others, and to forcefully convert others as permissible acts the only religion acceptable to support. Call major religions that haven't committed atrocities for hundreds and hundreds of years as dangerous, mean, and terrorist. Cheer the elimination of the only religion to survive for thousands of years because of it's tenacity and belief in education, hard work, and saving money. Once the "long standing" religions have disappeared, the one that truly has modern day "terrorists" will be easy to tear down and eliminate.

Teach young adults that having children will harm the environment, have politicians declare that having children is immoral in this day and age, have pop stars tell young people having children is immoral. Encourage killing the unborn and make it a brag-able thing to do and have movie/TV stars brag about killing their unborn to save the environment and to free them from responsibilities that would have "ruined" their lives. Have politicians tell young people it would have been moral for their mothers to have decided to kill them the day before their actual birthday.

Have the media shout that anyone who is old fashioned enough to not believe the above are racists, sexists, homophobic, and downright dangerous to society.

Yep a recipe for destruction of the family. Also, a fast way to depopulate, which TPTB need with the coming massive automation. It is estimated that within 30 years or less worldwide depopulation will begin after it reaches a peak, then the depopulation will be massive and fast. See Japan as an example of what will happen worldwide.

Who is left having children or families? The upper classes and the very wealthy who can afford them or pay someone to surrogate for them with genetically superior children. The servant classes who will keep things running will be living just above the poverty line and not having replacement level children. Problem solved through modern science, the crisis will have surrogate centers where children will be produced at a level just high enough to keep the world running for the upper classes. The children will be government raised and see government as god and parent.

Voila! The perfect world for those who have convinced themselves they are superior to everyone else, more intelligent than everyone else, more morally fit than everyone else - who will inevitably see the lower classes as pets to care for so they can be cared for.

Families destroyed - life for TPBT comfortable and cozy!

It's one of the tenants of Socialism to break up the family unit. Make the State responsible for the children.

Wake up people

a reply to: CmdrShep2154

Being poor in America in 2018 is much better than being middle class in the 50s. the middle class has shrunk a little but that is because those middle class people became upper class people. The upper class has grown. In the 50s-90s we didn't allow a lot of immigration.

originally posted by: funbobby
a reply to: CmdrShep2154

Being poor in America in 2018 is much better than being middle class in the 50s. the middle class has shrunk a little but that is because those middle class people became upper class people. The upper class has grown. In the 50s-90s we didn't allow a lot of immigration.

Supposedly, even the experts are having difficulty pinpointing the trends, but right now they say the trend for the middle class is downward.

The majority of the U.S. population (52%) are in the middle class, according to a recent report (September 2018) from the Pew Research Center. That is a slight increase from 2015 when the previous Pew Report found that the middle class made up slightly less than 50% of the U.S. population. However, the narrow majority found in 2018 still reflects a longer-term trend of a shrinking middle class compared to the 1970s, 1980s, 1990s, and the oughts.

www.investopedia.com...

a reply to: musicismagic

That only describes Democrat cities.

a reply to: InTheLight

I am having trouble figuring out what point you are trying to make.

originally posted by: funbobby
a reply to: InTheLight

I am having trouble figuring out what point you are trying to make.

Point is, the experts are having trouble figuring it out using their metrics, so take it all with a grain of salt. One thing for sure, the rich always seem to get richer.

a reply to: InTheLight

That's just class warfare talking. Here in America we don't even have fixed castes so class warfare arguments make no sense here. There are no "the rich". Does "the rich" getting richer take something away from others? Is wealth a zero sum game?

All I read was "Households with a single household income have less income than households with more than one source of income."

Duh.

a reply to: LABTECH767

And everyone just ''laughs'' as Epsteins reported plan to seed a superior race with his own ''super juice''.

originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: CmdrShep2154

I think a strong middle class is necessary to a free and democratic society.

I agree.

And the family provides security, stability, and strength... it empowers the individuals within the family. It means the individuals are not dependent on government, nor is the family. It's a safe place. A sanctuary one can return to after dealing with the trials and tribulations of life. Where everyone can "belong" and be valued and appreciated and most of all loved.

At least it used to. Unfortunately, even family is expendable and disposable these days, just like all people are expendable and disposable.

It's quite sad to see.

Bingo.

Have you also noticed that 9.9/10 times the female in a divorce walks away with the money and ongoing payments from the male spouse - pretty much by default?

You eliminate the possibility of successful men becoming more independent. That’s the point. Women know it and exploit it. It’s not so much to prop up women as it is to ensure that those who are otherwise successful remain held down, not advancing and thus pose little to no threat.

Breaking up the “family unit” is extremely useful for those who want to stay in power.

For the socialists, they are against any authority that is not the state. They are totalitarians.

They hate religion, because they don't believe in "God" outside of the state. The state is their god.

The state is the definition of good and evil. Just exactly what George Orwell/Erich Fromm was saying in 1984.

Family is the oldest social structure, and the one that most sane people want to help; to leave it to their offspring. The state wants you to view itself as your family, and your successor.

originally posted by: funbobby
a reply to: InTheLight

That's just class warfare talking. Here in America we don't even have fixed castes so class warfare arguments make no sense here. There are no "the rich". Does "the rich" getting richer take something away from others? Is wealth a zero sum game?

Of course we have castes. The castes are determined by what kind of money you have.

If you work for an hourly wage, then the money you earn is consumed in buying necessities. You will have to go back to work to earn more of it. If you are a worker, your money dissipates.

If you are of the investment class, then your money is Capital. You plant it and it grows and feed your children's children on through the centuries. And your capital creates dissipative specie for you to dissipate.


You are mistaken if you think we are a classless society.

We are simply a society without any class.

i need to talk with an intelligence personnel about a development i recently discovered that the Nigerian government is developing nuclear weapons and kidnapping people in broad daylight and using them for experiments in their scientific theaters, most of which make it out with chronic disease like partial dystrophies and frequent lockjaw, leukemia, cancers, epilepsy, those most lucky experience breathe and mental issues as they hear voices calling them fool around the clock. i began to do a private research after i lost my mother to hiv/aids in 2011, my father ambushed on his way traveling to cover it up and since been victim of gang stalking and blackmail... i need to talk with a professional so we can get result together for the betterment of humanity

a reply to: EnigmaChaser

Have you also noticed that 9.9/10 times the female in a divorce walks away with the money and ongoing payments from the male spouse - pretty much by default?

Actually, no... not in my state anyway. No-fault divorce and 50/50 split of assets is how it works here, usually with little to no alimony paid by either party. A non-custodial parent could pay up to 30% of their income to childcare, usually depending on the number of children. Of course, deadbeat parents -- both moms and dads -- who don't pay their child support are also a big problem. Sheriff Joe used to round them up and arrest them on Mother's Day and Father's Day.

You eliminate the possibility of successful men becoming more independent. That’s the point. Women know it and exploit it. It’s not so much to prop up women as it is to ensure that those who are otherwise successful remain held down, not advancing and thus pose little to no threat.

Divorce hurts everyone -- especially the children involved -- and I'm not going to place all the blame on the women. In fact, while times and statistics are now changing, historically women have come out of divorce with the short end of the stick far more often than men. Especially in lower and middle class income brackets. Single mothers are far more likely to live at or near poverty level than single dads -- both custodial and non-custodial. Which means the kids are living at or near poverty levels as well. No one really "wins."

Breaking up the “family unit” is extremely useful for those who want to stay in power.

Yes, it is.

As is the "war" between the sexes as just one more battle front in the divide-and-conquer campaign -- which you seem to have bought into lock, stock and barrel. As you point your finger at all the oh-so-awful women, just remember that four other fingers are pointing right back at you.

Between the feminists on one side blaming all men for every wrong in the world, and the incels and MGTOWs blaming women for every wrong in the world, we've given our kids some pretty screwed up ideas about relationships and marriage and people in general. Is it any wonder divorce is so common? And the ugliness surrounding it?

And it only benefits those in power who want to keep -- and increase -- their power. Divide-and-conquer operates on many levels, in many circumstances, and we all suffer the consequences the more people play foot soldier for THEM.

a reply to: Graysen

"Of course we have castes. The castes are determined by what kind of money you have. "

But of course I used the term "fixed castes" didn't I? In the societies where these class warfare theories come from there are actual castes, aristocrats are born aristocrats and die aristocrats and peasants are born peasants and die peasants.

In our society the amount of money you have constantly fluctuates doesn't it? Here in America poor people can and do become rich and rich people do become poor, in fact over the course of the average American's life they will occupy several "classes".

Workers can and do invest their money and become investors, a lot, if not most, people are both.

"We are simply a society without any class. "

Speak for yourself.


Without the investors investing in things would the workers have jobs? Does the investors making money prevent the workers from making money or enable it?

What percent of Americans do you think actually make minimum wage?

a reply to: booyakasha

ignorance is bliss... what would you have them do? getting their kids involved in the conscious nuclear war from inside out? make them learn how to create biological weapons, carry a disease in wait for the jolly school age mate to share with and consequently using them to improve on the trade for money? what is social about mixing up with disease carriers consciously even with religious and government education without the part were they are quarantined...

why do you not have to be certurn about the great feature you have imagined as a child but instead continually lives with that uranium self doubt (that will blow your mind) like your daily coffee drinking routing?

It's an aspect of the counter culture movement. Just research it and notice how the current counter culture of today, is no different than that of he 60s.

In fact, many of the politicans then are still in government today and have been almost continuously since then.

Keep that in mind when considering that as a factor of today's turmoil.