It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: stormson
a reply to: Vector99
So it seems you're stuck on the name we give the people that lived in the region before '48.
Why is Israel so special?
originally posted by: stormson
a reply to: IAMALLYETALLIAM
i wouldnt call it racist, more theologist, if i may coin a phrase.
its not so much the Jews and Israel, as what they represent, the Second Coming.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: Gothmog
Well, to cut down your entire thread
There was never a Palestinian land .
So , all stated is not historically accurate.
As far as Israel ceding land to the Palestinians ?
They were given the boot from the Muslim countries , including Egypt
The UN decided to give part of Israeli land to the Palestinians
Land that used to be held by the Philistines (Philistines are not Palestinian)
As an aside, the Philistines, it appears, were European.
originally posted by: stormson
a reply to: IAMALLYETALLIAM
Ah.
However, I hold to my idea as I know both evangelicals and Jews, and the evangelicals hold Israel in higher regard because it heralds the "second coming".
originally posted by: PhilbertDezineck
originally posted by: stormson
a reply to: IAMALLYETALLIAM
Ah.
However, I hold to my idea as I know both evangelicals and Jews, and the evangelicals hold Israel in higher regard because it heralds the "second coming".
In my opinion the evangelical hold Israel in special or higher regard is due to the promise
Gen 12:3
I will bless those who bless you, and whoever curses you I will curse; and all peoples on earth will be blessed through you."
originally posted by: stormson
a reply to: chr0naut
the jews ruled that land for less than a thousand years, were off it for 2 thousand years, an now its theirs agains, based on ancestral claim?
seriously, the native americans, who owned this land for several thousand years, and only been removed for a hundred plus, have more claim to ownership.
originally posted by: PhilbertDezineck
a reply to: new_here
Every politician regardless of dual citizenship has influence over foreign policy.
originally posted by: new_here
originally posted by: PhilbertDezineck
a reply to: new_here
Every politician regardless of dual citizenship has influence over foreign policy.
Yes of course. The point is that politicians who hold DUAL citizenship have DUAL allegiance. You see that, right?