-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -7W3N7Y-

originally posted by: dashen
a reply to: CriticalStinker

i have nothing but love for the shed faerie folk. ive even posted in there a long while back

Did someone mention "the shed"?? Those faerie folks are fine people. Especially Night Star. They might even be on to something. Nothing would surprise me anymore. Q might even be in there posting.

Thank you Dashen.

I had to read the last 6 pages of thread 19 only to find 4 more on this brand new, shiny thread 20.

We are all indebted to you for your tireless work. Take a big, well deserved bow mate!

I think we are getting close to the day.

6th of June 1944 ... D-Day

?? ???? ???? ... Q-Day

The day we take back our planet from those who would continue to enslave us.

Thread 20, here we go!

P

a reply to: pheonix358

We are getting close to that day! the day that the "sum of all fears" becomes a reality..not just a movie title.

Without a concrete plan of resolve...we're all just poking the bear without a gun.

CBSNews is spreading more Fake News. Now they’re trying to target Discord saying all of the 8Chan users are moving there since the Chans are down. 🤣

These idiots don't even know what Discord is and its been around for years.

a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

I believe Q has conquered many obstacles...The MSM has clearly not being taken. Should that not have been objective 1?

In a war setting...having the propaganda machine still churning, is curious and disheartening.

a reply to: Sabrechucker

Don't interfere with an enemy when they are destroying themselves.

Taking the lying heads down before now would have lead to a nightmare.

Allowing them to prove how disconnected they are and proving the lies they have been spreading via fake news broadcasts will seal their fate better than anything Q or The President could have done.

Remember the First Amendment.

Question for all if I may.

Does the First Amendment protect deliberate lies?

If your answer is yes, then I would ask, Should it?

P

a reply to: pheonix358

The 1st amendment doesn't specify truth. It's just plain old freedom of "expression/speech" Say what you want to say. Seems the Media has contorted that for their own gain.

Jeffrey Peterson:

***BREAKING*** News being reported out of Mexico, multiple sources about an alleged "extortion network" operated by CISEN (Mexican CIA), the American CIA under Obama, and former Mexico President Enrique Peña Nieto. The story is trending in Mexico right now. I will post more soon.

twitter.com...

The agreement between Cisen and CIA from "proceso" magazine Mexico In the fight against international terrorism, the Enrique Peña Nieto gov agreed with the CIA an espionage system 2 be use in Mexico against civilian targets and foreign diplomats, classified docs reveal

twitter.com...

a reply to: carewemust

Well that IS funny, but not reassuring like at least one single arrest or hot damn a conviction. (Epstein doesn't count because he probably got a fake chemical neuter and is watching The Price is Write in Gitmo.)
One real badguy put up against the wall or hung with a real rope for treason. Then the peepee dance to cooperate has substance. The rest is a sideshow.....with assurances of something big in hot August or maybe red Oct.
It's like fox snooze hype of being part of the family eating hotdogs in the parking lot and dancing to halfassed country bands. What there's no real news that fits the bandwagon facade?
The two sides of the isle need blood in their eyes instead of playing footsie when the cameras are off.
Oh boy we agree the odd squad sucks. Almost like they were wrote into the script for the part?
I don't buy any of this as the real show. It's a diversion from something bigger. A Roman Coliseum of distractions with absolutely everyone's buttons pushed.
Roll over top of anyone in the way of FULL disclosure in politics, history, science and whatever else for a firm foothold as to what reality is at the very least. Doj, fbi, cia, and politicains have dogsht for credibility and have stretched their leashes too far to even have a say at this point.
Puke it out...all of it. Transparency talks and bullsht walks. Should be D before C. Disclosure before Credibility..
And don't get me wrong, I would like the plan layed out by Q to be real. But he is as deniable as they come now ain't he! And fake news pfffft what are you doing listening to any of those perverts. Can't even hold a placeholder for much...fired his/her ass.
What segment of society would give a crap who was fired for blocking transparency...it would boost his ratings with every can.
Sorry it got long ....done now....and wasn't at you care....just a reply button

Dashen, thanks much for the new thread. Looking forward to seeing what develops with Q and all the associated topics.



Cheers

To all...




I got top bunk......

a reply to: pheonix358

Under U.S. law, many falsehoods even some deliberate lies receive the full protection of the First Amendment. Especially in politics.

Yes, I agree it should 100%. Otherwise, the gov't will begin to silence people for speech it does not agree with.

Yea, no doubt the msm propaganda machine is walking thin ice but as more people wake up they'll become less of an issue.

a reply to: PioneerFigureSkating

I wonder if that's the actual reason for the breakthrough in negotiations with China.

51,517 pounds is of fet is alot more than personal use. More like enough to kill every American 17 times.



I'm not sure where DEA is going with it's mission, since a bacteria has been patented which produces op8s. Once it is out of the bag, this will literally become an uncontrolled substance. Another win for science.

Anyway, the groups making mega-money off the drug trade are the worst bad actors, and rouge Chinese generals.

re G7, are we sick of winning yet?

originally posted by: FlyingFox


re G7, are we sick of winning yet?

is such a thing even possible?

a reply to: Sabrechucker

80s tunes. I'm impressed, good choices.

Planned back in 1988.?

a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

What power does "Independent" media hold in the event of a National Emergency?

It's a well thought out decades old plan

originally posted by: Sabrechucker
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

What power does "Independent" media hold in the event of a National Emergency?

Back to community bulletin boards. No, not electronic BBS; back to posting written info in a public place requiring “eyes on”. If DS is able to shut down the net.

a reply to: carewemust

I thought Attorney General BARR now has the ability to declassify and release anything he chooses. In this case, a Federal Judge ordered the documents released. Barr would merely be complying with a court order.

Federal government is a maze of opportunistic fiefdoms. They routinely ignore their own rules and arbitrarily impose others, especially when it comes to one part of the government contending with another part of the government. This will have one of two outcomes. It will produce either a symbolic knuckle-rapping (of which we've seen far too much), or the "bull elephants" will clash and one party will be forced to stand down.

Cheers

Here is our first solid opportunity to be REASSURED that President Trump knew what he was doing, when he picked AG Barr to succeed AG Jeff Sessions.

William Barr: Deep Stater -or- Swamp Drainer?

FYI: Indictment of former FBI Assistant Director Andrew McCabe is IMMINENT.

Federal prosecutors appear to be close to a decision on whether to charge former FBI official Andrew McCabe over the circumstances that led to his firing from the bureau last year.

A source close to the process said that McCabe has had a “target on his back” because of the Justice Department inspector general findings against him over actions during the Hillary Clinton email investigation, as well as his role in the surveillance warrants against Trump campaign associates during the Russia investigation.

McCabe is a former deputy and acting director of the FBI.

The New York Times, which first reported the developments Monday, said McCabe’s lawyers recently met with DOJ attorneys who would handle a prosecution – an indication of a possible indictment.

Source: www.foxnews.com...

Andy McCabe was recently hired by CNN as an "expert" for their anti-America guest panel. Hopefully, going to work for a terrorist organization like CNN, will make his indictment a certainty.