It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Apple and Samsung have been hit with a class-action lawsuit over claims that their phones expose users to radio frequency emissions up to 500 percent beyond federal limits.
The risks of such radiation levels, it continues, include “increased cancer risk, cellular stress...genetic damages, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders,” and a laundry list of other medical problems.
No major public health organization has thus far been able to link cell phone use with cancer or other serious ailments. However, a number of studies have found that even at levels far below those set by the FCC, significant health effects are possible. Radiation 2,000 times lower than the 1.6 limit was found to weaken the DNA of lab rats and decrease their sperm count. A dose four times lower was found to statistically increase the likelihood of malignant tumors, while exposure to just under half the limit alters the sleep patterns of users.
Source
No major public health organization has thus far been able to link cell phone use with cancer or other serious ailments.
originally posted by: Lumenari
a reply to: trollz
No major public health organization has thus far been able to link cell phone use with cancer or other serious ailments.
They should probably look outside the US then for studies.
Like Sweden, just off the top of my head.
What I have found in helping with my wife's cancer battle is that there are always several promising new findings being found outside the US, but America itself can't seem to be able to follow up on the studies.
Or in two cases I know of, have terminated the studies when it found that homeopathic methods in the US have greater success rates than standard chemo/radiation therapies.
I agree that this will be an interesting thing to watch but don't see America any time soon going anywhere in the battle on cancer.
After all, there is no real money in "curing" it.
Quite the opposite... it would hurt our economy.
Does anyone else ever get a weird vibrating feeling in their thigh like they had a phone in their pocket on vibrate? Loadsa times I've gone to "answer my phone" and realised there's no phone in my pocket...
originally posted by: trollz
What a world. I remember as a teenager when I was all excited to get a flip phone that I could send texts with (and you had to text with the number buttons). Cell phones have gone through a lot of changes over the years... And now they may be killing us with radiation.
Apple and Samsung have been hit with a class-action lawsuit over claims that their phones expose users to radio frequency emissions up to 500 percent beyond federal limits.
The risks of such radiation levels, it continues, include “increased cancer risk, cellular stress...genetic damages, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders,” and a laundry list of other medical problems.
No major public health organization has thus far been able to link cell phone use with cancer or other serious ailments. However, a number of studies have found that even at levels far below those set by the FCC, significant health effects are possible. Radiation 2,000 times lower than the 1.6 limit was found to weaken the DNA of lab rats and decrease their sperm count. A dose four times lower was found to statistically increase the likelihood of malignant tumors, while exposure to just under half the limit alters the sleep patterns of users.
Source
This is going to be an interesting thing to watch over the next decade or two, especially now that 5G towers are going up everywhere. On one hand, significantly lower levels of radiation than what we are exposed to on a regular basis have been shown to damage the DNA in rats, increase the risk of cancer, and alter sleep patterns. On the other hand, cell phone use hasn't yet been officially linked to cancer or other serious ailments... But that doesn't really mean anything, especially considering how money tends to influence findings and decisions, particularly when it comes to cancer and the things that cause it.