Minnesota Republicans Submit Request for IRS Investigation Into Omar’s Fraudulent Tax Returns

a reply to: Diaspar

I think the bigger question is why nobody has investigated her at all yet.

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: Deetermined
a reply to: muzzleflash

Put her in jail and then deport her after her time has been served. Isn't that SUPPOSED to be the standard protocol?

First she needs to be charged, and found guilty, if that happens, then yes, your protocol sounds right. I'll be curious to know if she is charged and found guilty, will she still have that smug little smile on her gob?

Maybe it'll be real tears because her ultimate goal of islamicizing the US, starting with MN, will be a failure. And she'll be deported.

originally posted by: LSU2018
a reply to: Diaspar

I think the bigger question is why nobody has investigated her at all yet.

Tax fraud, marriage fraud, immigration fraud, and campaign finance violations. Take your pick.

originally posted by: olaru12
Now Omar should retaliate by having the IRS go over Drazkowski's tax returns with a fine tooth comb and include his extended family and all their businesses. Careful what you ask for...you might just get it!!

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes!!

Politics can get gnarly for the dumbasses, trying to make political points with their constituents.

Lol, I can't even.............. Just.............

*facepalm*

originally posted by: uncommitted

originally posted by: M5xaz

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: Diaspar


Isn't this racist or Islamophobic?

If it isn't...it soon will be.

Sexist.

*boom*

Pussy-discrimination !!

So, I report this to PETA ?

I don't know, coming out with comments like that do PETA exist in the pathetic alternate reality you live in?

1.The reality where PETA is ONLY a money-making mill for the gullible, and that kills pets
www.petakillsanimals.com...

2.The reality where Omar commits immigration fraud and IRS fraud
www.startribune.com...

3.The reality where the First Amendment exists, which includes the ability to mock politicians and groups, particularly those that engage in 1 and 2

4. The reality wherein a number of low iQ morons exist that defend those engaged in 1 and 2 above.

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan

originally posted by: LSU2018
a reply to: Diaspar

I think the bigger question is why nobody has investigated her at all yet.

Tax fraud, marriage fraud, immigration fraud, and campaign finance violations. Take your pick.

All of the above if we weren't living in a society where double standards were the democrat standard.

originally posted by: M5xaz

originally posted by: uncommitted

originally posted by: M5xaz

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: Diaspar


Isn't this racist or Islamophobic?

If it isn't...it soon will be.

Sexist.

*boom*

Pussy-discrimination !!

So, I report this to PETA ?

I don't know, coming out with comments like that do PETA exist in the pathetic alternate reality you live in?

1.The reality where PETA is ONLY a money-making mill for the gullible, and that kills pets
www.petakillsanimals.com...

2.The reality where Omar commits immigration fraud and IRS fraud
www.startribune.com...

3.The reality where the First Amendment exists, which includes the ability to mock politicians and groups, particularly those that engage in 1 and 2

4. The reality wherein a number of low iQ morons exist that defend those engaged in 1 and 2 above.

That's certainly not the reality democrats live in.

originally posted by: bluesjr

originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: Diaspar

Is this the same as asking a president for tax returns?
There are no laws stating the president must show his returns but I don't know if that's true in Minnesota for their law makers..

Not really the same. They are asking the IRS to look at her tax returns, not for the release publicly. So actually doing it the correct way and not just looking for political bullets to be used against her (like so many are trying to do do with Trump's tax returns).

That's a good point.

Minnesota Rep Says If ‘Congress Would Do Their Job,’ Omar Might ‘Not Be There Much Longer’

August 9, 2019 Anthony Gockowski State Rep. Steve Drazkowski (R-Mazeppa) joined Tucker Carlson Wednesday night on Fox News to discuss the latest developments in the case of Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN-05).

As The Minnesota Sun reported, Drazkowski and several of his colleagues announced Tuesday that they have submitted formal requests to the IRS and the Minnesota Department of Revenue asking for investigations into Omar’s fraudulent 2014 and 2015 tax returns. He’s also submitted a formal request for an investigation with the U.S. House Committee on Ethics. Drazkowski told Carlson Wednesday night that the committee is “acting on that at this point.” “So the Department of Revenue knows about it, they received a letter yesterday from us. The IRS knows about it. Congress knows about it, and the media know about it. We are making certain that all of the people who should be investigating this are aware of it,” he said.

“We’re appealing to the right people. As a matter of fact, you’re right—it was a sham marriage. She lied to cover it up,” Drazkowski said of allegations that Omar married her brother to help him immigrate to the country.

He went on to say that Minnesotans “wouldn’t have elected her and she wouldn’t be in Congress today” if the truth had been revealed sooner. “If Congress would do their job, she might not be there much longer,” he added. “We’re getting the information in front of people that should be doing the work and we’re simply asking them to do their job.”

Drazkowski concluded the interview by noting that Omar’s office continues to “stonewall” on the allegations against her, saying that’s “the opposite behavior of what you expect to see from someone if they believe that they’re innocent.”

“The media here in Minnesota continues to just have blatant disregard for this and it’s a struggle with the media,” he said.

Source< br />
Short 3 min video in the link of the Tucker Carlson interview

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan

originally posted by: Deetermined
a reply to: muzzleflash

Put her in jail and then deport her after her time has been served. Isn't that SUPPOSED to be the standard protocol?

It would certainly be interesting if she was the first sitting congressman to be deported from the country.

Lincoln deported many a congreemen and shut down may news papers that did not see things his way. This would not be the first time someone has been deported

originally posted by: uncommitted

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: olaru12

if you have done nothing wrong, you have nothing to fear.

Admirable words, Trumps tax returns will be published when exactly? Do audits usually run for a presidential term?

Presidents DO NOT have to publish their tax returns
And , if one gets technical , only 2(?) Presidents ever have.
They can and do release their W-2 forms
If they want to.
And , Trump already has. As candidate Trump
Business audits can last for many years. Especially if one does business overseas as well

Denying ignorance .
Why ?
Only to those that dont rightly know

originally posted by: LSU2018
a reply to: Diaspar

I think the bigger question is why nobody has investigated her at all yet.

Please tell me that is rhetorical?

Why should trumps tax returns be published? Because you want to see them? Id support the same thing that is being proposed here, a private review by officials. But I'm not a two faced political zealot like most screaming for attention.

How concerned are you for the safety of our president?


a reply to: uncommitted

originally posted by: M5xaz

originally posted by: uncommitted

originally posted by: M5xaz

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: Diaspar


Isn't this racist or Islamophobic?

If it isn't...it soon will be.

Sexist.

*boom*

Pussy-discrimination !!

So, I report this to PETA ?

I don't know, coming out with comments like that do PETA exist in the pathetic alternate reality you live in?

1.The reality where PETA is ONLY a money-making mill for the gullible, and that kills pets
www.petakillsanimals.com...

2.The reality where Omar commits immigration fraud and IRS fraud
www.startribune.com...

3.The reality where the First Amendment exists, which includes the ability to mock politicians and groups, particularly those that engage in 1 and 2

4. The reality wherein a number of low iQ morons exist that defend those engaged in 1 and 2 above.

No, low IQ morons would think twice before referring to someone who's female as a pussy - I guess you've got a way to go before being classed as high up the ladder as low.

originally posted by: Rob808
Why should trumps tax returns be published? Because you want to see them? Id support the same thing that is being proposed here, a private review by officials. But I'm not a two faced political zealot like most screaming for attention.

How concerned are you for the safety of our president?


a reply to: uncommitted

What's the safety of your president got to do with the fact that this thread is about tax returns of one congresswoman while your president appears to have a reason not to reveal his?

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: uncommitted

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: olaru12

if you have done nothing wrong, you have nothing to fear.

Admirable words, Trumps tax returns will be published when exactly? Do audits usually run for a presidential term?

Presidents DO NOT have to publish their tax returns
And , if one gets technical , only 2(?) Presidents ever have.
They can and do release their W-2 forms
If they want to.
And , Trump already has. As candidate Trump
Business audits can last for many years. Especially if one does business overseas as well

Denying ignorance .
Why ?
Only to those that dont rightly know

So why would you have any business knowing about the tax returns of a member of congress when you have no idea what the returns of your presidents may reveal about the true state of his business dealings?

BTW, if one gets technical and actually looks, every president including and since Nixon have released their tax returns - that only took a minute to check on google so let's think about denying ignorance.

originally posted by: uncommitted

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: uncommitted

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: olaru12

if you have done nothing wrong, you have nothing to fear.

Admirable words, Trumps tax returns will be published when exactly? Do audits usually run for a presidential term?

Presidents DO NOT have to publish their tax returns
And , if one gets technical , only 2(?) Presidents ever have.
They can and do release their W-2 forms
If they want to.
And , Trump already has. As candidate Trump
Business audits can last for many years. Especially if one does business overseas as well

Denying ignorance .
Why ?
Only to those that dont rightly know

So why would you have any business knowing about the tax returns of a member of congress when you have no idea what the returns of your presidents may reveal about the true state of his business dealings?

BTW, if one gets technical and actually looks, every president including and since Nixon have released their tax returns - that only took a minute to check on google so let's think about denying ignorance.

You do know there is a possibility of tax fraud.
A good possibility
Do you not know what the thread is about ?

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: uncommitted

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: uncommitted

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: olaru12

if you have done nothing wrong, you have nothing to fear.

Admirable words, Trumps tax returns will be published when exactly? Do audits usually run for a presidential term?

Presidents DO NOT have to publish their tax returns
And , if one gets technical , only 2(?) Presidents ever have.
They can and do release their W-2 forms
If they want to.
And , Trump already has. As candidate Trump
Business audits can last for many years. Especially if one does business overseas as well

Denying ignorance .
Why ?
Only to those that dont rightly know

So why would you have any business knowing about the tax returns of a member of congress when you have no idea what the returns of your presidents may reveal about the true state of his business dealings?

BTW, if one gets technical and actually looks, every president including and since Nixon have released their tax returns - that only took a minute to check on google so let's think about denying ignorance.

You do know there is a possibility of tax fraud.
A good possibility
Do you not know what the thread is about ?

Yes, the usual suspects howling and sobbing about a female muslim democrat congresswoman - that's what this thread is really about, isn't it?

You do know that more than two presidents released their tax returns now, don't you?

originally posted by: uncommitted

originally posted by: M5xaz

originally posted by: uncommitted

originally posted by: M5xaz

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: Diaspar


Isn't this racist or Islamophobic?

If it isn't...it soon will be.

Sexist.

*boom*

Pussy-discrimination !!

So, I report this to PETA ?

I don't know, coming out with comments like that do PETA exist in the pathetic alternate reality you live in?

1.The reality where PETA is ONLY a money-making mill for the gullible, and that kills pets
www.petakillsanimals.com...

2.The reality where Omar commits immigration fraud and IRS fraud
www.startribune.com...

3.The reality where the First Amendment exists, which includes the ability to mock politicians and groups, particularly those that engage in 1 and 2

4. The reality wherein a number of low iQ morons exist that defend those engaged in 1 and 2 above.

No, low IQ morons would think twice before referring to someone who's female as a pussy - I guess you've got a way to go before being classed as high up the ladder as low.

Superficial and narcissist low iQ libtards keep voting and defending Omar, who has asked a judge for clemency for ISIS recruits, and for AOC, who had a public hissy fit of hysteria over a garburator. The only reason they are voted in office is because they are women - totally unsuitable, they have NO SUBSTANCE, e.g. pussys. Grow up, get a life, learn some discernment and vote on issues, not based on presence or absence of a penis.

Put her in jail...then send her back humiliated. reply to: muzzleflash