It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
What's a Long Ranger?
In his flight manifests they list a 2002 flight from Zorro to Double Eagle in his Long Ranger using the N# of the State Dept
Because it wasn't in use. The plane carrying it crashed in 2000.
Why doesn't the N-nmber ever show up assigned to a nongovernmental owner in between 2000 and 2014?
Show me that he did.
Pretty convenient that he just happened to fly on a State Dept N-numbers.
Which facts would that be?
Also notice you make no attempt to address the other two facts...
What's a Long Ranger?Â
Because it wasn't in use. The plane carrying it crashed in 2000
Show me that he did.Â
Which facts would that be?Â
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: 5StarOracle
I'm not offended. Just wondering why it matters that Democrats are among those involved.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: carewemust
I don't suppose you have an actual source for that?
Thanks. So it definitely wasn't one of Epstein's jets as someone claimed.
It's a stretched Bell Ranger (206L)
I did. The number was assigned to the Bronco with serial number 15488 which crashed in 2000. It was reassigned in 2014 to the Cessna. No other assignments.
State owned it applied to the Bronco until the N-number was cancelled in 2010. Feel free to look up the N-number on the FAA site.
There are 73 pages there of what appear to be a pilot's log book. I see one entry which shows that tail number. Is it to be assumed that Epstein owned that helicopter and used it for nefarious purposes based on that?
I linked you the manifest that shows that from the "undisputed facts" in evidence from the Epstein v Edwards (and parties) case. You are free to continue to feign ignorance.
It's a pilot's flight log, used to log flights for certification purposes. I suppose you have evidence that he communicated an incorrect tail number to controllers or that the aircraft actually carried that tail number at all? Because that would be illegal.
I only have evidence that his manifest demonstrates he flew on a 206L which was illegally flying under an n-number assigned to another aircraft-- one that in a giant coincidence belonged to the State Dept.
No idea, but I didn't say it was a typo.
That's quite a typo! What do you think the odds of that are?