-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -§19§-

Maddow talking about qanon. Live starts at -12 minutes

a reply to: scraedtosleep

But I'm not a Q follower per se. To me, Q is engulfed by a bigger movement. One of humanity that encompasses us all

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

Lol I tried dropping Baseball into a Q search, nothing for that, then I tried 9 innings, but that just brought up the 1-9s and a lot of other 9s. While some could be a interest I think that was a stretch. Had to kick the rock over though, just to cover all bases.

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: Diaspar


JE could've given his POA to one of his lawyers or business manager to make out and sign the will.

Could be, but the Affidavit and Notary Public section, page 11, seems to indicate Epstein was present at that time.
I still think it raises questions why JE would have this will drawn up and sign it just 2 days before his "suicide".
Doesn't add up...unless he was pressured into it and/or knew what what was coming...

originally posted by: Diaspar

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: Diaspar


JE could've given his POA to one of his lawyers or business manager to make out and sign the will.

Could be, but the Affidavit and Notary Public section, page 11, seems to indicate Epstein was present at that time.
I still think it raises questions why JE would have this will drawn up and sign it just 2 days before his "suicide".
Doesn't add up...unless he was pressured into it and/or knew what what was coming...

Well, after the first unsuccessful attack in jail, he began to worry there may be a successful second attack...and decided he should make a will.

originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

You sure spend a lot of time here for someone that is active in their community.

But sure. If you say so why not?

But you know just as well as I do that most people on these threads are not active.


What actions did you take that got epstien arrested?
What real actions have you taken to take down any ds players?

My point is that you haven't. None of you have. q hasn't.

But you could. Yet you waste your time giving energy to others. Like q who is afraid to even show his face.
All those decodes and numbers you "uncovered" What real harm has any of that done to the bad people?

Really rel. Give me some real evidence that anything you have personally uncovered on these threads has been used to hurt the ds.

Have you heard of smart phones? They go where you go even into the community!

You ask why no one (an assumption you make) does anything. Let's see you try to do something. Put up or shut up, quit criticizing til you do.

Why don't you post the action you have taken to make the world a better place before trying to criticize anyone who is interested in the revelation of hideous corruption? Q never takes down anyone we all know that. Q provides information to us to awaken us. I am glad that journalist you mention did what she did to take down Epstein. That is fantastic to her for doing all she did.

Remember when Trump did something similar during his first trial (back before he had started the dismantling of the deep state that protected him.) When he called lawyer dude and said let's talk. The case she fought so hard to reopen was one that some say was instigated by what Trump did. To Trump for trying so many years ago. to the clowns who did not see it thru the first time actually half to them for if it had been prosecuted properly then we might not have President Trump now. TGFT TGFQ

a reply to: scraedtosleep

The quickest, easiest way to support Dr. Epstein would be to stop using Google

originally posted by: DontTreadOnMe

originally posted by: PioneerFigureSkating


ETA: is pastebin not allowed here?

That would be a "no"....

OK. Thanks. To be honest I don't even know what pastebin is. Just ran across it today.

originally posted by: ColdWisdom

originally posted by: cimmerius

I wonder if this serves, in effect, to launder the money so that it can not be confiscated?

It is now legally owned by a person not established to have been involved in the crimes.

Nah, they can still seize his assets. I would say that the recent Supreme Court ruling on civil asset forfeiture might stop them in their tracks, but the EO signed by POTUS earlier in his term totally supersedes ordinary civil asset forfeiture.

They’re probably just waiting to seize the fortune so that they can follow the paper trail to see who’s hands it ultimately ends up in.

Epstein wasn't convicted. I don't believe they can seize it now, or am I wrong?

a reply to: IAMTAT

Well, after the first unsuccessful attack in jail, he began to worry there may be a successful second attack...and decided he should make a will.

Like i said then, he knew what was coming. That and perhaps Mo$$ad wanted their money...via a Trust fund

originally posted by: Diaspar
a reply to: IAMTAT

Well, after the first unsuccessful attack in jail, he began to worry there may be a successful second attack...and decided he should make a will.

Like i said then, he knew what was coming. That and perhaps Mo$$ad wanted their money...via a Trust fund

I would bet that this was actually a CHANGE in his will...a new will that would nullify his previous will.
THAT previous will would've probably included Ghislaine Maxwell...and others whom he no longer trusts or, perhaps, would want to implicate.

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: Diaspar
a reply to: IAMTAT

Well, after the first unsuccessful attack in jail, he began to worry there may be a successful second attack...and decided he should make a will.

Like i said then, he knew what was coming. That and perhaps Mo$$ad wanted their money...via a Trust fund

I would bet that this was actually a CHANGE in his will...a new will that would nullify his previous will.
THAT previous will would've probably included Ghislaine Maxwell...and others whom he no longer trusts or, perhaps, would want to implicate.

Agree. Almost certainly was for this purpose.
It would be interesting if a previous version turns up, perhaps one he had in one of his many safes, to see who was on that one...

originally posted by: imthegoat

originally posted by: ColdWisdom

originally posted by: cimmerius

I wonder if this serves, in effect, to launder the money so that it can not be confiscated?

It is now legally owned by a person not established to have been involved in the crimes.

Nah, they can still seize his assets. I would say that the recent Supreme Court ruling on civil asset forfeiture might stop them in their tracks, but the EO signed by POTUS earlier in his term totally supersedes ordinary civil asset forfeiture.

They’re probably just waiting to seize the fortune so that they can follow the paper trail to see who’s hands it ultimately ends up in.

Epstein wasn't convicted. I don't believe they can seize it now, or am I wrong?

They may be able to freeze assets based on pending civil suits and co-conspirator indictments.

twitter.com...

I wonder if his Trust lawyers had taken out a life insurance policy on JE back when he was arrested or just prior.

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: scraedtosleep

You obviously haven't read the parts of the thread covering Qwiki and the 2 members who went dark just before it was due to go live!

Shout out to JanAmosComenius and Tigertatzen - miss ya both!

Ya so close and yet so far

MODELING AGENCY PROVIDED JEFFREY EPSTEIN WITH OVER 1000 UNDERAGE GIRLS -


m.jpost.com...

a reply to: cherokeetroy

But how many did they get back?

a reply to: dashen

Epstein was GIVEN this enormous rape/orgy mansion for sexual blackmail AND some truly crazy connections and history here...

2 great informative vids about Epstein the scumbag and all of his known connections...

Whitney Webb has a 4-part series about the history and connections of Epstein - summarized in this interview
Begins at 6:30:


The Epstein Crime Map:

I am hopeful that AG Barr is going to be instrumental in cleaning out the swamp and getting to the bottom of so many things Q has made drops about, ranging from Clinton to Obama corruption. While doing some digging, I found this very interesting article about AG Barr, including his close ties to Reagan and Bushes, his supposed background as a CIA operative, and his involvement Iran-Contra arms for hostages, and much more.
Thoughts?


William Barr and the Iran-Contra Scandal

A couple of interesting quotes from the article,

The issue at hand is not Barr’s “legal mind”, but the ruthless mind that he wielded with frightening authority and expertise as George H. W. Bush’s treasonous hatchet man in the Justice Department. William Barr distorted and corrupted the law, as grossly as anyone in modern history.

And,

Why is William Barr—the antithesis of a “patriot” and the swampiest of swamp monsters— now being inserted into the middle of what is supposed to be a “white hat” anti-corruption operation? The move is baffling. Why did Trump make the pick—the sole pick—so immediately, seemingly without thorough vetting? Who recommended Barr for the job? The “white hats”, or the “black hats” that have never stopped planting assassins into Trump’s inner circle? Is it significant or coincidental that the Barr pick came shortly after the death of George H.W. Bush?

Here's a bit of good news. Cardinal Pell lost his appeal today in Australia.

news.yahoo.com...#

The upsetting part is the guy only got a 6 or 7 year sentence and is eligible for parole in less than 4. But, on the other hand, he's like almost 80 years old. Which means he may die in prison anyways. I'd imagine prison is very hard on people once they get to be that age.