It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ConfusedBrit
originally posted by: Hunkadinka
The flare-dropping exercise was planned way in advance but the gullible tie one to the other because they obviously have a problem accepting truth.
Which potentially leaves us with just three aircraft flying across for Part 1 of the evening. Not sexy AT ALL.
originally posted by: ConfusedBrit
originally posted by: Hunkadinka
The flare-dropping exercise was planned way in advance but the gullible tie one to the other because they obviously have a problem accepting truth.
However, we are not really the target audience for such UFOtainment, are we? A buck will be made, whatever we say. In the meantime, I'll continue digging into cases that are genuinely more anomalous in nature. The Wheat and Chaff principle.
One query remains about Phoenix - witnesses to the first event who recall no sound from the three lights. Can we rationalise this as an example of the second part of the evening (silent flares) accidentally coalescing with the first in witnesses' memories?
originally posted by: JimOberg
a reply to: Hunkadinka
"Sometimes you have to accept what's offered for the visual impact."
No, I do not have to.
The visual impact is real, but it's a cheat.
Without context any video is worse than useless, just eye-candy to amaze the target audience without any use in understanding the potential causes of the apparition.
IMHO.
originally posted by: data5091
a reply to: JimOberg
saw on my comcast guide for next week, this show will be about ufo's and cover ups. Also an ex CIA employee speaks out. Looking forward to it as usual.