It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Willtell
So, actually according to them they need these foreign workers or we won't get our lettuce and tomatoes, milk and eggs.
originally posted by: dfnj2015
originally posted by: Waterglass
a reply to: dfnj2015
Hay, the crops are ripening and Americans don't want the work.
Correction, Americans don't want the work because it pays too little. Having good wages is highly motivating!
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: Willtell
So, actually according to them they need these foreign workers or we won't get our lettuce and tomatoes, milk and eggs.
Will,
Here is the crazy part... Americans do not want to work on a farm. If they use illegals they can pay whatever they want with no over site. If they use legal workers then there is over site and they need to pay set limits, and maybe even minimum wadge. Very win win for all...the Americans who will not work on a farm and the legal workers who actually get compensated more.
Here is the kicker as to why the liberals hate this idea...they might pay 20 cents more per pound due to the increase cost in labor...oh the horrors...
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: Mach2
A good honest days labor on a farm is not slavery. Having grown up on a farm, I did my share. The reality is, if you have little or no education, and no marketable skill, most of what's left is manual labor at relatively low wage. What do ppl expect? It's not easy, but it's not slavery either.
Wait!!! You do not pay a person 200 bucks to mow your lawn that takes 20 mins?
The pay of a position is based on the worth of that position is to a company. This is why a sales person makes so much less than an engineer, and why a typical Mexican picker can make very good wages as they are crazy good at picking.
If a person said hey I'll mow your lawn and I said since it takes 20 mins I'll pay you 20 bucks and the person said nothing under 50 will do then I guess I'll mow my own lawn, and hell I'll come over and mow yours for 50 too. The position is worth 20 to me...take it or leave it.
originally posted by: Willtell
I was thinking that maybe the farmers actually like this since it gives them, as you mentioned, unsupervised by our labor laws—workers....Very hard workers.
One wonders why they want to come to work like that. Goes to show us that in those LA countries it must be rough.
originally posted by: Mach2
Say we passed a law tomorrow, that $20/hr is the new minimum wage. In a very short period of time (likely weeks) there would be a chain reaction of wages rising persuant to the percieved value relative to the "base" of $20. This would cause immediate equal+ inflation, and the buying power of everyone would be the same, or less than it was to start with.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: Mach2
Say we passed a law tomorrow, that $20/hr is the new minimum wage. In a very short period of time (likely weeks) there would be a chain reaction of wages rising persuant to the percieved value relative to the "base" of $20. This would cause immediate equal+ inflation, and the buying power of everyone would be the same, or less than it was to start with.
The other part is for a company to be viable they pay no more than 36% of their gross towards wages. If you raise minimum to 20 bucks then companies will find ways to do the work with less people. at 12 bucks an hour a real person might be cheaper where at 20 bucks an hour a kiosk could be cheaper replacing multiple workers, as example, so you cut your work force by 50% to keep within the 36% margin.