Bright Insight has a new video. In this one, Jimmy touches on little known about ancient sites in Saudi Arabia and Iran. Modern day archeologist claim
these sites are from the Nabatean culture. Claiming that a tent dwelling race built / carved out these massive monuments. You decide for yourself.
Additionally, he speaks about the overwhelming possibility that there is a plethora of ancient sites undiscovered under the Persian Gulf; referencing
a new archeological find in Iraq, in 2018 — that was only discovered due to a drought. The Persian Gulf has an average depth of 165 feet and a
maximum depth of 295 feet. Which would make it prime territory for ancient sites to be covered by rising sea levels.
He also talks about how he believes the Assyrian winged bulls were most likely created by a much older civilization than they are accredited to. He
shows videos of himself visiting one of the sites in 2010, while he was in Iraq on deployment. Unfortunately, he also shows what ISIS has done to the
very site he visited — basically wiped it out of existence. Who is commissioning these rebels to destroy such important ancient sites / artifacts?
What is the motivation?
originally posted by: spiritualarchitect
"a plethora of ancient sites undiscovered under the Persian Gulf"
Like the Garden of Eden.
ps: Nuke ISIS Now!
I believe they think the garden of eden was in between the Tigris and the Euphrates — which both flow into the Persian Gulf. So this is very
Possible.
Regarding ISIS, the point of my statement was that I believe there are much more powerful figures ordering them to destroy these sites. The question
is, who and why. And yes, nuke all those bastards!
Thoroughly enjoyed, not directly linked but on a similar theme there is a current story headlining on MSN about an Israeli discovery of a 9000 year
old city. www.msn.com...
CC=1563327311
That MSN link seems too long to show up as a link so here is one to the Jerusalem post article. www.jpost.com...
Apparently there are remains of buildings, alleys and it seemed to have been well designed with a population in excess of several thousand people, a
storage building has been found to have contained up grain's which would show that the people of this city were practicing agriculture over seven
thousand BC.
Clever guy's those Israeli's, they have also on another occasion produced evidence for early agriculture twenty three thousand years ago. www.theguardian.com...
This is relevant because it shows that there were probably settled people's performing agriculture long before the fertile crescent farmers were
practicing it and pushes back the likelihood of complex human settlement's well into the last ice age when sea level's were lower of course, this does
not mean that some great cataclysmic period did not bring it to an end however meaning that it may then have had to be reinvented BUT it does remain
pertinent to the idea of previous civilization and of course during earlier times some of these isolated location's were actually very much more
fertile.
I love bright insight's previous video as well, the temple of Hathor in Egypt may have been built on the roof of an earlier temple which may have
been deliberately buried, perhaps even a larger one if that is the case and of course how old would that earlier temple be?.
And an independent theory based on celestial alignment that there was an earlier temple on the site (perhaps it's still there just beneath what is
now the floor - the old roof. beforeatlantis.com...
What we have to remember is that even the best archaeologist was NOT there so what they say was is only really there interpretation of the evidence
they have found and therefore only really there opinion - if an educated one as I mean let's be fair dating pieces of ancient pottery on sight takes
years of experience and yes they probably make just as many mistakes but still?.
My believe human history is far longer than is sold to the people today, far longer and far more complex and I doubt that we are the first
technological civilization especially given potential ancient technological industrial waste such as the Ural spires etc which someone must have
manufactures - but up to a third of a million years ago?.
And on the same theme (main thread).
edit on 16-7-2019 by LABTECH767 because: (no reason given)
edit on 16-7-2019 by LABTECH767 because: (no reason given)
Personally this is absolutel 100% proof that there were amazing technologies in existence back then that we have no idea about currently.
I can't imagine what may have been used to carve such immense, intricate structures into solid rock in many places around the earth.
If I had to guess I'd say maybe some kind of advanced acoustic apparatus that uses precision focused soundwaves/resonance in such a way that it carves
through rock like butter but obviously this may be way off.
Hopefully one day we'll find out.
Actually, just had one more thought; what if(going with the technology/information suppression and deliberate destruction by the "PTB" scenario) these
technologies were once so powerful that in the wrong hands they were equivalent to a tactical nuke?
And further what if they were actually once used to wipe entire civilizations of the map?
If there were a small, powerful group of people existing today that knew of these events, what lengths would they go to to stop it happening again?
I dunno, at the very least would be a good idea for a movie!
Fascinating! I’d never heard of the megaliths in Siberia before. Thanks for sharing that. There are so many ancient megalithic sites around the
world — all so similar to each other. It feels as though we haven’t even scratched the surface on discovering all of them. Hopefully, in the near
future, the main stream starts accepting and acknowledging that there were much more advanced civilizations in our ancient past.
Totally plausible. If the tech had the ability to carve these massive pieces of rock — I would presume it could be used for more nefarious
destructive purposes.
It may not be all that old as the complex in it's current configuration is only about 2000 years or so old though it probably comprises many older
part's, Egypt also suffered many catastrophic flood's and in fact that flooding was a very necessary way of life for the Egyptian's without which the
Nile culture would never have flourished as much as it did since it was those same flood's that were necessary to lay down fresh rich silt and
fertilize there field's.
The downside though was that some low lying structures (even entire city's) then became buried and many old temples have water mark's often very high
up showing that they have been submerged by the Nile flood's at least once and usually several time's in there past so it is possible that this temple
was flooded and buried in silt then simply not dug up but instead rebuilt on top of.
So it could be as recent as just a few hundred years older or perhaps it could be many thousands of years older but the top of that piller supporting
the floor and buried right up to it's top in sand and sediment mean's that there may be some fantastic and well preserved artifact's and inscriptions
in the vast buried hall's below that may shine a light on entire periods of ancient Egypt and then what if that temple was itself built atop an even
earlier one?.
There are probably many Egyptian town's, small city's and villages as well as even monumental structures yet buried beneath the sand and silt of the
ages in Egypt but like many other places were already worked stone could be re-used it often was so at least the upper courses of many of these
earlier sites were later re-used at other sites.
The Osirion is interesting, it appears to have once been above ground but is now deep into the earth, when excavated it was thought and is still
claimed to be a part of a probably much later funerary temple complex but there is actually no evidence to prove this.
I actually believe the Egyptians rebuilt many OLDER structures left over from a lost age of humanity, that they RENOVATED them and though they did
build some amazing thing's I do not believe they build the Pyramids of Giza, rather I believe they renovated them at least on the outside and the
inscription from the relieving chambers supposedly found by a British colonel was a fraud and there is lot's of evidence to support the fact that was
added by that same man whom just wanted to claim glory for himself, using dynamite to blow holes inside the pyramid itself, probably searching for
treasure fruitlessly so he had to have something, the graveyard on Giza were pyramid builders are buried is real but I once again believe they were
merely Renovators whom repaired and rebuild the ancient site perhaps restoring the casing stones to the outside of the pyramid and this is actually
supported by the Egyptians (Ancient) themselves on the dream stele a pillar left between the paw's of the sphinx which was erected by Thutmoses the
IV, he never claimed to have built the site but to have renovated it.