had an epicenter less than 5 miles from a DC-area Military Base in Mineral. VA.
It dawned upon me to ponder which quake affected the most people in US, overall?
At first I thought of the 2004 Sumatra quake on Boxing Day or Christmas day for us here in the western hemisphere that was the worst quake in the
world for the past 60 years, at 9.3
Second, this July 4th weekend's quakes which were on Independence Day and then the day after, but those 2 main ones so far are only in the 6-7
range.
But Google says its the DC-area quake that was felt by 1/3 of US population (which is the same fraction of Americans left that still are
actually employed full-time).
What next, a quake so big that HALF of all US population feels it? Or WORSE? And where, at their capitol again, maybe on some auspicious holiday this
time?
It sounds impressive doesn't it ... until you realize that stat mainly only reflects population density, not how strong the actual quake was.
If the quake were strong, they'd say half the country felt it, not merely a third of the population, but you can pack a large percentage of the
population into a densely populated space ... say Southern California into the big cities or New York, New Jersey and the Capitol Corridor area and
you don't need an especially strong quake for a lot of people to be inside the area that feels it.
Most that same quake out to an epicenter around Yellowstone, and you barely register in percentage of the population who will feel that same quake.
Not so impressive when you think about it.
I totally agree - it's all about location and the population density surrounding. If the quake had been a little more north, it might have been
40-50% of the population