It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: BrianFlanders
Please don't misunderstand my point; I was in no way suggesting his reasoning was 'okay' in any sense of the definition. The point is, he must have had a reason, a motivation or motive, and it's important to understand what this motive was (twisted as it may be) so we as a society can deal with other individuals who might be similarly motivated.
originally posted by: madmac5150
If you look at the venue that he shot up... a country music concert...
I'm guessing he was a radical leftist, that wanted to kill a lot of conservatives.
If that is the case, it would be politically devastating... for the leftist deep state.
What better motive would the feds have, to cover up the shooters true motive?
originally posted by: djz3ro
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: MasterOfNonexistent
assasination, covered as mass shooting ..
2nd line
"Attempted"
The target was not killed or wounded 😎
You have a theory on who the intended target was? Do tell...
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: djz3ro
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: MasterOfNonexistent
assasination, covered as mass shooting ..
2nd line
"Attempted"
The target was not killed or wounded 😎
You have a theory on who the intended target was? Do tell...
Here's one I "heard" about...
The "Target" was Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia Mohammad bin Salman.
The "Hit" arranger was Saudi Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal.
bin Salman was at the concert dressed in regular "Country-Western".
Most of the shots fired came from inside the concert area.
Some came from the East and possibly the Southeast, no shots were fired from the West (Mandalay Bay or Luxor), or from the South (Tropicana).
Many videos (some with sound) surfaced that had clear visuals of the "Windows" at Mandalay Bay yet no shot flashes were ever seen. Most of the clear videos have been systematically taken down from the internet.
A few weeks after the LV Shootings, Al-Waleed was arrested in Saudi Arabia along with a few hundred others.
Al-Waleed also had close contact with Jamal Khashoggi who was later killed.
The name "Stephan Paddock" was used because the "Name" became an FBI "disposable identity" a few years earlier.
😎
originally posted by: djz3ro
originally posted by: madmac5150
If you look at the venue that he shot up... a country music concert...
I'm guessing he was a radical leftist, that wanted to kill a lot of conservatives.
If that is the case, it would be politically devastating... for the leftist deep state.
What better motive would the feds have, to cover up the shooters true motive?
If I remember correctly he was actually a right wing country and western fan himself. He had booked a hotel overlooking a rock/metal concert too but didn't act on that occasion, or didn't honour his booking, I can't quite remember...
www.apnews.com...
www.theguardian.com...
originally posted by: BrianFlanders
Frankly, I don't really need to hear that there was a motive or what it was. I can live with the explanation that "shxt happens". It always has and always will. The actual murder rate in the entire world as of right now is probably lower than it ever has been. Or at least lower than it has been for the better part of a century. Violent crime has been dropping like a rock for more than a decade and all we get is this scare mongering they've been bombarding us with because shxt still happens from time to time because it is the price we pay for freedom.[/quote
They got you brainwashed to think shxt happens and always will, when something like that happens and gets covered up or evidences ignored. WAKE UP.
ON another note, if that video was showing Paddock with weapons and ammo in luggage… well, they're made out of plastic because I see no evidence of HEAVY luggage in that video.
I think it involved black magic. But I believe in that; and many do not; so my theory immediately causes people to write me off at the point I mention that.
originally posted by: stonerwilliam
a reply to: Flyingclaydisk
There was so much wrong with that story from the word go , and people claiming to see shooters at other hotels on the strip , yet we have a lone gun man again ? The Saudi angle is interesting as is the airport across the road and who was meeting nearby .
The top ten floors and the Saudi and Trump connection is the key i think
I see it the same way as I'd see it if he killed one person with a tire iron.
originally posted by: olaru12
a reply to: Flyingclaydisk
I don't even think Paddock was the dead guy in the hotel room; we never saw his face. The whole event is so rift with inconsistencies and lies from the authorities; how can you believe anything in a 1984 atmosphere that has become America.
The Clark County Coroner’s Office fought the release of the autopsy report, choosing to pay more than $32,000 in legal fees instead. Now it is clear that the revelation that Stephen Paddock actually died at 12 p.m. on Oct. 2, 2017, may have been what they were trying to hide, because it calls the validity of every police officer and FBI agent involved in the investigation into question, and it opens a new host of questions about how the massacre unfolded.