It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ManFromEurope
a reply to: Lumenari
You are talking about Christians, good people, right? They would and should care.
originally posted by: UpIsNowDown
Strange thing is there are more of this type of defensive posturing threads than any blaming anyones god, I mean Pres
lots of replies from the usual Trump admin team, not many from the dims blaming said demi god, huh go figure?
originally posted by: Breakthestreak
None of them qualify as asylum seekers
Not
A
Single
One
7.) U.S. immigration officials have, over the years, failed to recognize circumstances in which large numbers of people are legitimately seeking political asylum, and thus have contributed to humanitarian tragedies.
From turning back German Jewish refugees in the late 1930s, to denying asylum status to Haitians fleeing the Duvalier dictatorship, to opposing the asylum claims of Salvadorans fleeing political violence in the 1980s, successive administrations have repeatedly underestimated the seriousness of human rights abuses, with political calculations overtaking humanitarian concerns.
During El Salvador’s and Guatemala’s civil wars, now widely recognized to have been characterized by widespread human rights abuses and where the repressive governments’ were backed by the United States, the United States rejected almost all asylum claims from these countries.
In 1984, only three percent of the asylum cases from these countries were granted, in contrast to much higher numbers of approvals for citizens of countries whose governments were considered hostile to the United States (such as Iranians and Afghans fleeing the Soviet invasion); an outcome which had more to do with political decisions rather than assessing the merits of the claims themselves.
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: Edumakated
There is some pretty convincing speculation that that picture is fake.
Also, why in the #e!! would a parent try to cross the Rio Grande River with a baby. That's just plain stupid.
That's what I thought too. Crisis actors. How does one drown AFTER crossing the river safely and making it to dry land?
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Guyfriday
We have so many killings in Chicago every week, I have no problem looking at this man/child as an "alleged" death. Even if it's real, it's just 2 of thousands of people who die every day, due to their own mistakes. (Electrocution...eating too much...fighting.. etc.)
originally posted by: XCrycek
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Guyfriday
We have so many killings in Chicago every week, I have no problem looking at this man/child as an "alleged" death. Even if it's real, it's just 2 of thousands of people who die every day, due to their own mistakes. (Electrocution...eating too much...fighting.. etc.)
I'm guessing you don't have kids...
Hell, I don't even think you have a family.
originally posted by: SeaWorthy
originally posted by: Breakthestreak
None of them qualify as asylum seekers
Not
A
Single
One
Many have been granted so I guess that can't be true can it.
7.) U.S. immigration officials have, over the years, failed to recognize circumstances in which large numbers of people are legitimately seeking political asylum, and thus have contributed to humanitarian tragedies.
From turning back German Jewish refugees in the late 1930s, to denying asylum status to Haitians fleeing the Duvalier dictatorship, to opposing the asylum claims of Salvadorans fleeing political violence in the 1980s, successive administrations have repeatedly underestimated the seriousness of human rights abuses, with political calculations overtaking humanitarian concerns.
During El Salvador’s and Guatemala’s civil wars, now widely recognized to have been characterized by widespread human rights abuses and where the repressive governments’ were backed by the United States, the United States rejected almost all asylum claims from these countries.
In 1984, only three percent of the asylum cases from these countries were granted, in contrast to much higher numbers of approvals for citizens of countries whose governments were considered hostile to the United States (such as Iranians and Afghans fleeing the Soviet invasion); an outcome which had more to do with political decisions rather than assessing the merits of the claims themselves.
www.wola.org...
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: XCrycek
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Guyfriday
We have so many killings in Chicago every week, I have no problem looking at this man/child as an "alleged" death. Even if it's real, it's just 2 of thousands of people who die every day, due to their own mistakes. (Electrocution...eating too much...fighting.. etc.)
I'm guessing you don't have kids...
Hell, I don't even think you have a family.
I have two. They are in their early 20's now. Why do you ask...or even care?
originally posted by: Edumakated
originally posted by: UpIsNowDown
Strange thing is there are more of this type of defensive posturing threads than any blaming anyones god, I mean Pres
lots of replies from the usual Trump admin team, not many from the dims blaming said demi god, huh go figure?
Leftist can't defend this sh*t...
NY Times, CNN, WaPo, and others all ran articles trying to tie deaths to Trump's policies while ignoring that Democrats refuse to secure the border which is what is causing these people to attempt to come to the US in the first place.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: Lumenari
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: Lumenari
a reply to: Edumakated
They don't care.
THEY don't care.
They don't CARE.
As many bodies as it takes to make a political point,,,
They don't care.
Disgusting people, really.
Weird that they have people that will continue to support them.
But that's where we are now.
Republicans for Choice From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Democrats for Life of America From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Perhaps the situation is more complicated than your opinion?
This tragedy being politicized is pure propaganda.
I guessed you missed the part where it about the border.
Oh!!!!
Here in America the border isn't the ocean.
I forgot your particular... circumstance again.
I apologize but in the realm of American politics online you are not really that memorable.
Yes but you are politicizing a tragedy, saying that the Democrats don't care. Yet the Reeeepublicans are the ones who seem to not give a damn about the humanitarian crisis there, because it might mess with their personal comfort and greed (you know, the whole "they come here to take our jobs and sponge off social services that WE pay for with OUR taxes").
Sure turn away those who don't really fit the criteria for asylum but don't accuse the ones that do fit of being drug dealers, rapists and terrorists, when they clearly aren't.
Take for instance all the stuff that Trump said about the caravans. Been 2 years, where's the evidence that any of it is true? Yet he escalates the rhetoric and classifies an improving situation into a fake 'national emergency'.
And to top it all off, you guys use this for propaganda?
Really?
At what point do progressives recognize they are creating an "attractive nuisance" by not securing the border?
Only because historians may not understand the nuance of guilt tripping people into thinking we must save everybody who wants to to come here for a better economic life. That is the mistake of socialism and globalism all mixed up into one ball.
originally posted by: Guyfriday
originally posted by: Fallingdown
It’s sad to say.
But we might be the first country in human civilization to fall from “ feelings “.
That will confuse historians in the future.
Just because he tried to cross the river doesn’t mean the wall doesn’t deter others, it just happens that was the place he chose to come over the border. By the way, why the caravans don’t stop at Mexico? Did you know Mexico had the same jobs we do? They have gold mining, agriculture, construction , etc. but it pays less.
originally posted by: byteshertz
At what point do progressives recognize they are creating an "attractive nuisance" by not securing the border?
I am not from the US, so don't start labeling me left or right please.
Left-wing, right-wing, same pea brained eagle in my book, but each to his own.
However, I have not heard a plan to secure the US yet. I did hear a little oompa-loompa talking about building a wall but clearly you can't be referring to that because if people are crossing rivers to get there, surely we can see a wall would not be of benefit.