The Case Against Playing in the Evolution Court.

originally posted by: edmc^2

originally posted by: strongfp
Lets reset to 2005 when creationists first started their crusade to spread false information, and along came some very intelligent and outspoken minds to prove them wrong. This guy in the YT video I linked and Thunderf00t alone can smack creationists around with videos they made over a decade ago.

Here watch all this mans series of Foundational Falsehoods of creationism.

Argument from authority again?

Stand on your own and defend evolution. Let's discuss it on merits. I can defend Creation myself not from authority. Otherwise, your argument is weak.

Lol. Nobody wants to teach a grown up that 2+2=4 while your crying and whining that it equals 3 cause your granny said so.

originally posted by: Woodcarver

originally posted by: edmc^2

originally posted by: Woodcarver
a reply to: edmc^2

How much time have you actually spent with your head in the serious books? How much does your belief in god keep you from accepting what multiple fields of study all agree on? Do you think you can disprove thousands of scientists who have tested these theories in real life for over 150 years since Darwin’s origin of species?

wow! talk about 'argument from authority'. Nice going there Woody.

Let me see. What you said falls on #1, 2,3,4,5,6 of my list, maybe 7 and 8?

But seriously, conjecture aside, I'm still looking for that missing link. Do you happen to know where I can find it? I mean solid evidence of a GRADUAL TRANSITION.

It’s all right there in any college you can find. Nobody cares if you don’t believe in science.

You're funny Woody. See list #1,2,3 and maybe 8,9,10.

I bet you don't know the demarcation between Abiogeneses and biological evolution. Isn't science great?

Thanks to science, we have so many advancements in engineering, medicine, business, architecture, and many more.

Imagine without science, no trip to the moon.

Science is great but it becomes a mockery when someone believes that a fish becomes an amphibian - without evidence.

originally posted by: Woodcarver

originally posted by: edmc^2

originally posted by: strongfp
Lets reset to 2005 when creationists first started their crusade to spread false information, and along came some very intelligent and outspoken minds to prove them wrong. This guy in the YT video I linked and Thunderf00t alone can smack creationists around with videos they made over a decade ago.

Here watch all this mans series of Foundational Falsehoods of creationism.

Argument from authority again?

Stand on your own and defend evolution. Let's discuss it on merits. I can defend Creation myself not from authority. Otherwise, your argument is weak.

Lol. Nobody wants to teach a grown up that 2+2=4 while your crying and whining that it equals 3 cause your granny said so.

huh? How old are you?

your arguments are weak.

Put some thought in it.

originally posted by: edmc^2

originally posted by: Woodcarver

originally posted by: edmc^2

originally posted by: Woodcarver
a reply to: edmc^2

How much time have you actually spent with your head in the serious books? How much does your belief in god keep you from accepting what multiple fields of study all agree on? Do you think you can disprove thousands of scientists who have tested these theories in real life for over 150 years since Darwin’s origin of species?

wow! talk about 'argument from authority'. Nice going there Woody.

Let me see. What you said falls on #1, 2,3,4,5,6 of my list, maybe 7 and 8?

But seriously, conjecture aside, I'm still looking for that missing link. Do you happen to know where I can find it? I mean solid evidence of a GRADUAL TRANSITION.

It’s all right there in any college you can find. Nobody cares if you don’t believe in science.

You're funny Woody. See list #1,2,3 and maybe 8,9,10.

I bet you don't know the demarcation between Abiogeneses and biological evolution. Isn't science great?

Thanks to science, we have so many advancements in engineering, medicine, business, architecture, and many more.

Imagine without science, no trip to the moon.

Science is great but it becomes a mockery when someone believes that a fish becomes an amphibian - without evidence.

Your list is made up. You don’t care enough to educate yourself.

It doesn’t matter if you believe in science anyways. You don’t need it to work in a church or a mcdonalds.

originally posted by: edmc^2

originally posted by: Woodcarver

originally posted by: edmc^2

originally posted by: strongfp
Lets reset to 2005 when creationists first started their crusade to spread false information, and along came some very intelligent and outspoken minds to prove them wrong. This guy in the YT video I linked and Thunderf00t alone can smack creationists around with videos they made over a decade ago.

Here watch all this mans series of Foundational Falsehoods of creationism.

Argument from authority again?

Stand on your own and defend evolution. Let's discuss it on merits. I can defend Creation myself not from authority. Otherwise, your argument is weak.

Lol. Nobody wants to teach a grown up that 2+2=4 while your crying and whining that it equals 3 cause your granny said so.

huh? How old are you?

your arguments are weak.

Put some thought in it.

Just go read one of the thousands of threads here on the subject.

originally posted by: Raggedyman
Creationists cant lose the argument with anyone who forwards evolution
Creationism has science on their side, their is no empirical evidence for evolution, evolution is a faith

Rather than defend creation, just contest the science of evolution and evolution dissolves almost instantly
Problem is the average evolution believer doesn’t have a clue what science really is.

I'm with you 100%.

Sorry for my earlier post to your post - it was meant for TD.

originally posted by: Woodcarver

originally posted by: edmc^2

originally posted by: Woodcarver

originally posted by: edmc^2

originally posted by: strongfp
Lets reset to 2005 when creationists first started their crusade to spread false information, and along came some very intelligent and outspoken minds to prove them wrong. This guy in the YT video I linked and Thunderf00t alone can smack creationists around with videos they made over a decade ago.

Here watch all this mans series of Foundational Falsehoods of creationism.

Argument from authority again?

Stand on your own and defend evolution. Let's discuss it on merits. I can defend Creation myself not from authority. Otherwise, your argument is weak.

Lol. Nobody wants to teach a grown up that 2+2=4 while your crying and whining that it equals 3 cause your granny said so.

huh? How old are you?

your arguments are weak.

Put some thought in it.

Just go read one of the thousands of threads here on the subject.

Done that already - just so you know, my Fav go to website for evolution is 'talkorigins'. You can't top that.

Now, why do you believe a theory that's not really based on science but conjecture?

a reply to: Woodcarver

Come on Woodie, enough childish insults I would say it’s beneath you but, well it seems all you have is insults

Enough, let’s work on real science and real evidence, let’s search for empirical evidence for evolution

I will hold your hand and lead you, see that door 😁

But seriously, you are so easily ridiculed and dismissed because you havnt offered any real science, just faith statements

Get the evidence Woodie, you can do it

a reply to: edmc^2

🦄💃🦁

originally posted by: Woodcarver

originally posted by: edmc^2

originally posted by: Woodcarver

originally posted by: edmc^2

originally posted by: Woodcarver
a reply to: edmc^2

How much time have you actually spent with your head in the serious books? How much does your belief in god keep you from accepting what multiple fields of study all agree on? Do you think you can disprove thousands of scientists who have tested these theories in real life for over 150 years since Darwin’s origin of species?

wow! talk about 'argument from authority'. Nice going there Woody.

Let me see. What you said falls on #1, 2,3,4,5,6 of my list, maybe 7 and 8?

But seriously, conjecture aside, I'm still looking for that missing link. Do you happen to know where I can find it? I mean solid evidence of a GRADUAL TRANSITION.

It’s all right there in any college you can find. Nobody cares if you don’t believe in science.

You're funny Woody. See list #1,2,3 and maybe 8,9,10.

I bet you don't know the demarcation between Abiogeneses and biological evolution. Isn't science great?

Thanks to science, we have so many advancements in engineering, medicine, business, architecture, and many more.

Imagine without science, no trip to the moon.

Science is great but it becomes a mockery when someone believes that a fish becomes an amphibian - without evidence.

Your list is made up. You don’t care enough to educate yourself.

It doesn’t matter if you believe in science anyways. You don’t need it to work in a church or a mcdonalds.

Sorry Woody, but, defend your faith in evolution. Not weak argumentum.

originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: edmc^2

🦄💃🦁

Let me add this:

The arguments presented by proponents of evolution is so weak that they will force if not trick anyone to play by their own rules. Use their own terminology and craziest of all use their textbooks. Once you're in that court, any argument you present will be ridiculed.

They will say, you don't understand science, you hate science, you don't know evolution. That's how they play the game.

Most of the time, they will argue from authority.

originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: Woodcarver

Come on Woodie, enough childish insults I would say it’s beneath you but, well it seems all you have is insults

Enough, let’s work on real science and real evidence, let’s search for empirical evidence for evolution

I will hold your hand and lead you, see that door 😁

But seriously, you are so easily ridiculed and dismissed because you havnt offered any real science, just faith statements

Get the evidence Woodie, you can do it

Raggedy, please allow me to run this by you. I've asked this question so many times to evolutionists and can't get a straight answer.

Evolutionists keep asking for an alternative to evolution, but if I say:

Origins+Evolution = non-living to living.

Origins+Creation = Living to Living/Life begets life.

Which one is 100% testable and credible?

I get attacked.

originally posted by: edmc^2

originally posted by: Woodcarver

originally posted by: edmc^2

originally posted by: Woodcarver

originally posted by: edmc^2

originally posted by: Woodcarver
a reply to: edmc^2

How much time have you actually spent with your head in the serious books? How much does your belief in god keep you from accepting what multiple fields of study all agree on? Do you think you can disprove thousands of scientists who have tested these theories in real life for over 150 years since Darwin’s origin of species?

wow! talk about 'argument from authority'. Nice going there Woody.

Let me see. What you said falls on #1, 2,3,4,5,6 of my list, maybe 7 and 8?

But seriously, conjecture aside, I'm still looking for that missing link. Do you happen to know where I can find it? I mean solid evidence of a GRADUAL TRANSITION.

It’s all right there in any college you can find. Nobody cares if you don’t believe in science.

You're funny Woody. See list #1,2,3 and maybe 8,9,10.

I bet you don't know the demarcation between Abiogeneses and biological evolution. Isn't science great?

Thanks to science, we have so many advancements in engineering, medicine, business, architecture, and many more.

Imagine without science, no trip to the moon.

Science is great but it becomes a mockery when someone believes that a fish becomes an amphibian - without evidence.

Your list is made up. You don’t care enough to educate yourself.

It doesn’t matter if you believe in science anyways. You don’t need it to work in a church or a mcdonalds.

Sorry Woody, but, defend your faith in evolution. Not weak argumentum.

This would be more fun if you and Raggedyann argued about who’s skydaddy’s hell i’m going to go to.

originally posted by: edmc^2

originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: Woodcarver

Come on Woodie, enough childish insults I would say it’s beneath you but, well it seems all you have is insults

Enough, let’s work on real science and real evidence, let’s search for empirical evidence for evolution

I will hold your hand and lead you, see that door 😁

But seriously, you are so easily ridiculed and dismissed because you havnt offered any real science, just faith statements

Get the evidence Woodie, you can do it

Raggedy, please allow me to run this by you. I've asked this question so many times to evolutionists and can't get a straight answer.

Evolutionists keep asking for an alternative to evolution, but if I say:

Origins+Evolution = non-living to living.

Origins+Creation = Living to Living/Life begets life.

Which one is 100% testable and credible?

I get attacked.

Yea, there ya go, you two talk it out.

Creationists are like horses. You can lead them to water, but they’re not smart enough to understand books. Even if you read it to them.

a reply to: Deetermined

You need to watch the entire series...

a reply to: edmc^2

Authority?

The video I posted was a pure amateur at the time, and was still in his ladder climb to become a full blown paleontologist.

As far as wanting to see evidence for evolution that's easy.

Let us look at exhibit A: Instances of observed speciation.

originally posted by: strongfp
a reply to: Deetermined

You need to watch the entire series...

Why would I take a video seriously that a precursory scroll shows clips from silly cartoons?

originally posted by: Deetermined

originally posted by: strongfp
a reply to: Deetermined

You need to watch the entire series...

Why would I take a video seriously that a precursory scroll shows clips from silly cartoons?

Do you want people to bring you things to watch? Or not?

Watch the thing, and then ask questions about the contents.

If you ask questions, nicely, people won’t dismiss you. You have to at least listen to what people are saying. There is literally 150 years of research that backs this stuff up.

a reply to: Deetermined

Because it actually makes creationism sound like it's fact but in fact it's a joke, a made up sham. The series evolves (Ha) into much more intelligent criticism that basically just ignores all the fantasy land religious mumbo-jumbo which falls flat on it's face and tells a very strong rebuttal towards the creationist point of view.

There is more than enough evidence to suggest that evolution happens.