Insider Blows Whistle & Exec Reveals Google Plan to Prevent “Trump situation” in 2020 on Hidden

originally posted by: FlyingFox
a reply to: chr0naut

Oh, cool, you have discovered some of those Ruskie memes.

originally posted by: Breakthestreak
a reply to: chr0naut

We shall see.

I think ‘something damning’ doesn’t mean what dEms think it means

They thought that ‘revealing’ that a billionaire playboy cheated on his wife would be ‘damning’, like it was some sort of surprise that a billionaire does billionaire things.

Whatever they ‘have’ would have to be fairly earth shattering to pull even one single vote away from him

I think the actions of dem supporters over the next 18 months will drive people away from the dEms just like the last three years.

But, we’ll see. I think he’s got 2020 in the bag. Very hard to argue that he’s not good at being President.

Plus, I admire you for your ability to stay away from petty name calling and character attacks during ‘disagreements’ with avid Trumpsters like myself. You’re a bigger man than I in that regard, even if I do very much disagree with your outlook.

Cheers, we agree to disagree.

a reply to: DanZek

Will Google register as a Russian foreign agent???

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

Imprecise language my you know what. She was very calmly and nonchalantly saying, Google needs to stay big so that Google can prevent a candidate to be elected. That is election tampering and I do believe that is illegal in the US, and just about anywhere else in the world. The kind of person that would smile as she stabs you.

originally posted by: Breakthestreak
a reply to: chr0naut

No. He did not win because the American people were propagandised.

That’s a lie.

And if anyone of the two is comparable to Hitler, it’s hilary, the fascist.

Hitler idealized the Fascists under Mussolini and later, when Hitler had taken power, he sided with the Italian Fascist party. The Nazi's and the Fascists were extreme right-whingers and were both anti-Communist (who were extreme left-whingers).

Once again, word definitions: Definition of propaganda - Merriam Webster

originally posted by: Breakthestreak
a reply to: chr0naut

And yes, that IS the definition of fascism.

Fascism From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Think how we think or we’ll silence you. Attack you. Shut you down and marginalise you.

And someone has done that, to you?

The very playbook of the democrat left.

Now, you just watch. Even with all the leftist attempts at influencing the elections, the NON STOP media lies against him, Trump will win.

As previously pointed out, what you called media lies were either truthful, or were distortions of what the media actually said.

By a landslide

No, it will be a mudslide. All that swamp water he drained, that turned out to actually be his executives and appointments. In a tidal wave of continual pleading Tweets of it wasn't me, it was him and him, and him, and her, and him, and him, and them, and him...



If 'nearly everyone in the world' is saying that one person is the problem, perhaps the problem isn't 'nearly everyone in the world'?

The whole narrative is like the Wizard of OZ scene, the guy behind the curtain, is making this great show of collusion/obstruction/orange man bad; meanwhile we have google and enemy operatives trying to distort the truth via slanderous propaganda and omission of key facts.

American politics is a three ring circus of utter stupidity at this point, Trump doesn't help, but it's how he defies a system that has pulled and is pulling out every trick in the book to bring him down.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Breakthestreak
a reply to: chr0naut

No. He did not win because the American people were propagandised.

That’s a lie.

And if anyone of the two is comparable to Hitler, it’s hilary, the fascist.

Hitler idealized the Fascists under Mussolini and later, when Hitler had taken power, he sided with the Italian Fascist party. The Nazi's and the Fascists were extreme right-whingers and were both anti-Communist (who were extreme left-whingers).

Once again, word definitions: Definition of propaganda - Merriam Webster

It's quite clear you have not even a clue about what you are talking about.

originally posted by: Sillyolme



Some people will believe just about anything if it aligns with their thinking.

Most ironic post in ATS history?

On topic: as if we had any doubt this was happening. This isn't news to most of us. The important part is to get this out there to people who didn't believe this was happening. There are still some open-minded people out there.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Breakthestreak
I believe the influence they had was insignificant

Not worth claiming “Russian influence” like a cNn-fed moron

He still would have won regardless

And he will win again in 2020, regardless

Trump didn't win the popular vote at all, he won the Electoral College vote primarily because of 7 faithless electors who did not vote Democrat, despite being pledged to. Only one EC Republican voter was faithless.

It is a hole in the EC system that because of low numbers of actual voters, it is financially possible to pay off a small number to vote faithlessly and to therefore win the vote.

This appears to be what happened in 2016. If there was electoral corruption, it points directly to the Trump campaign, not the Democrats.

Whoever told you to think this lied to you. The only thing accurate there is that Trump didn't win the popular vote. The rest of it is nonsense. Trump won by 77 electoral votes. 7 faithless electors were not the "primary" reason he won. They're not even the tertiary reason. They literally had zero impact. And there's zero evidence of any payoffs, you just made that up out of thin air.

Learn to think for yourself. You got tricked, bad. Whoever is telling you this crap is making you look like a fool.

a reply to: DanZek

her response is garbage, because she turned off comments, deleted her twittter, etc.

my psycho [minion under the influence of media] friends do the same thing on fb. they jump on my page, yell at me, then when i debate, they just stop replying when i post facts.

they are allowed to yell and rand and cry. when i present the facts to their tantrums, they ignore.

same as this skank.

a reply to: face23785

i WISH my friends thought for themselves.

they now quote famous celebrities. [clooney and anglina jolie both c-fr no less.]
but people who 'hated' popular media growing up, now quote celebrities.

i realized, most of these celebrities never graduated high school, let alone college. but they push agenda, so they get lots of attention in the media.

and then someone like lady gaga goes on axxcess hollywood, and dump pr0paganda on the minions, and then we have quotes like this seven 'faithless' electors. lol.

originally posted by: dantanna
a reply to: face23785

i WISH my friends thought for themselves.

It's really just not allowed on that side. Remember when the wikileaks emails came out? They falsely told people it was illegal for common people to read them, only the media could. Don't worry, they'll tell you what to think. It's their job.

Google is a private company and if you don't like them, don't use them. If enough people do this, then they go under (it's called capitalism). There are other options. If you need to look something up, you can always 'Duck Duck Go it" from your 'Blackberry" phone.

originally posted by: AScrubWhoDied
Somebody's lying:

What actually happened

I quit reading soon as that idiot wrote about "Russian Influence."

It's so obvious whom is trying to influence whom. I mean I don't even vote but morons like that are the reason I'll be voting Trump 2020.

Google is a private company and if you don't like them, don't use them. If enough people do this, then they go under (it's called capitalism). There are other options. If you need to look something up, you can always 'Duck Duck Go it" from your 'Blackberry" phone.
a reply to: JimD350

Standard oil was a private company too and was broken up under anti trust laws. We can only hope Google will be broken up too.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Breakthestreak
a reply to: chr0naut

No. He did not win because the American people were propagandised.

That’s a lie.

And if anyone of the two is comparable to Hitler, it’s hilary, the fascist.

Hitler idealized the Fascists under Mussolini and later, when Hitler had taken power, he sided with the Italian Fascist party. The Nazi's and the Fascists were extreme right-whingers and were both anti-Communist (who were extreme left-whingers).

Once again, word definitions: Definition of propaganda - Merriam Webster

LOL what???

originally posted by: DanZek
a reply to: Generation9

All they have done is prove Veritas right. Google may as well replace the 'o's with swastikas.

Your are so right and that post by Chr0 being removed for trolling was spot on Mods!

It is considered fact that Nazi's were Socialist as are Fascists and only hate Commies as another form of competition.

originally posted by: Thecakeisalie
a reply to: DanZek

Well this confirms our suspicions.

When I want news, I watch the news. You can't keep the truth hidden, as there are other sources, so this plan is pointless. Not every person has to resort to Google the news.

Not to mention bots are capable of writing news stories...

It isnt just about the news. It is about every request for information being manipulated to the agendas of social sciences as a tool toward controlling people.

originally posted by: Sillyolme



Some people will believe just about anything if it aligns with their thinking.

The lack of self-awareness from you and the two people that gave you stars is mind numbing.