Senators get classified briefing on UFO sightings

a reply to: dogstar23

Or if they get promotions and cakewalk assignments or assigned to work on special projects, that could be another conspiracy angle (for doing exactly as they're supposed to.)

Your mean RETIRED Cmdr. David Fravor . I thought that once your RETIRED you cant. Why is it you come out to perpetuate ignorance? The one guys retired. So why don't you track the other two down and let the world know as to whether they remain active enlisted or discharged. Go ahead. Lets do this and discredit the article!

Retired Cmdr. David Fravor spent 18 years as a Navy pilot, but nothing prepared him for what he witnessed during a routine training mission on Nov. 14, 2004.

a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

Many here are to not DENY ignorance they are here to PERPETUATE ignorance especially those Chatbots. Too many people are tired of being hosed, kicked and stomped on and simply screwed, especially by Uncle Sam's Minions. It will come out sooner rather than later as they have to as high technology is now in the "commoners" hands so we serfs can figure it out and cut a better deal.

a reply to: Waterglass

Methinks UFO could be a code word for something else. Perhaps they are concerned about foreign powers' technology, when I saw my UFO there is no possible cway it could be shot down, if It was armed...

If the brass thought it was concerning enough to alert the POTUS, then they made the right decision. However maybe he was being informed on a secret Black budget project...

The only thing I have ever seen was some freaky flying things with lights doing maneuvers that at the time seemed impossible but that was back in the early 90s on base at Redstone Arsenal which you know is where the military rocket geeks are, so probably a test of something.

Those same maneuvers can now be done by off the shelf drones.

a reply to: dogstar23

Those 3 little monkeys at play methinks.

See no Evil, hear no evil, and speak no evil, only thing is the whole shebang is evil by design.

Or at least no exactly transparent.

Apparently for our own good.

Have to wonder what constitutes such these days all the same?

a reply to: Thecakeisalie

Thanks. Based on whats being leaked into the public arena there is a fight going on between those in the know and those who will be expendable. Sounds like it goes way beyond those considered deplorable by Mrs Clinton and the the Navy has struck out. Look at how many are trying to discredit several who have spoken out including the guy that runs the web siteThe Black Vault . He seemed to discredit Luis ElizondoI. I am surprised that he took that position. I always wondered as to whether he was a conduit for the see eye eh. At this point I am leery.

a reply to: Grimpachi

Can they zig zag hundreds of miles like a cursor on a PC in seconds. That's what several of us saw last May 2018 as there were [7] of the. We did consider:

NASA Is Launching Microsoft's Hologram Technology To The Space Station

Thoughts?

These objets that we saw were the multi-color: red, blue, green, white, and yellow, pulsating and flashing objects. I filed a report with NUFORC but never sent them the videos

a reply to: Waterglass

Greenewald is not trying to discredit anyone, he is simply reporting the very odd answers he was getting back from the Pentagon.

Frankly, people should be thankful that at least somebody is doing a bit of due dilligence and telling us when some things don't quite fit!

The mindless cheerleading on display around the internet is, at best, distasteful, and throwing Greenewald under the bus for reporting what he has found will not help the cause.

So just stop it.

a reply to: Waterglass

As I said what I saw was back in the early 90s. Back then the stuff they were doing I would have thought to be impossible now it can be replicated.

You brought up holograms and I did see a video of some Japanese company that made a breakthrough. I think they used intersecting lasers to project the images at distance.

link

originally posted by: Waterglass
a reply to: danbuter


So do we fight or let the "men" in charge auction us off to ET for asteroid fertilizer?

Here's hoping that if they are out there, they are friendly. No way we can beat someone with interstellar travel in a real war.

a reply to: SirKonstantin

People still trust their governments to tell them the truth.

The hologram theory, makes sense but the radar was picking up physical objects. Can a hologram trick radar. If it could, talk about really mess with a country's military resources. Wasting time, money, freaking them out instead of focusing on a real threat. It would be the greatest diversion tactic of all time if kept secret. It would also explain how it defies the physics of force, mass acceleration as we know it.

a reply to: beetee

I listened to his [Greenewald] radio show and I also read this

Greenewald

How The DD Form 1910 Does NOT Prove A Public Pentagon Release; And How It May Harm The Credibility of Mr. Luis Elizondo and TTSA Last Update: June 9, 2019 – More OFFICIAL STATEMENTS by the Pentagon to The Black Vault Regarding This Form

I was shocked by what he said as I always thought that Greenewald was a white hat in this arena.

So just stop it.

I listened to episode 27 on radio and I am still confused by it.

"Everything seems to suggest that Elizondo had some sort of involvement with the program, but that suggesting he was leading it appears to be something of an embellishment. But you have to wonder if there isn’t something else going on here… oh, not about the USS Nimitz and the UFO sighting, but in the promotion of the television show. Having the leader of the AATIP program leading the TV investigation makes it a little more credible. But that only works if the credential can be verified. Does merely having some association with the program, rather than actually leading it reduce the credibility? Or more importantly, does embellishing the role of the lead investigator on the History program diminish that credibility of that program?"



Snippet from an article in Kevin Randles blog

kevinrandle.blogspot.com...

a reply to: IMSAM

Thanks

a reply to: Waterglass

Must be discosure very soon with all these short snippets coming on a weekly basis. The public must be told the truth before it's too late and I hope the worlds military don't go in all guns blazing but try to talk and figure things out coz otherwise we are doomed, unless they would leave ordinary citizens alone and just attack what atacks them.

a reply to: Waterglass

If you read the post that IMSAM just added to your thread you will perhaps see that it is not just Greenewald who is having problems getting confirmation of what Elizondo actually did at the DOD.

I'm sure Greenewald can mess up too, and get carried away, but we should not be shooting the messenger.

I think the distrust should be aimed where it belongs, either towards the people at TTSA for not being completely honest or towards the Pentagon for being deceptive in their replies.

I bear no ill will towards Elizondo, but I think he should clear this up.

a reply to: Waterglass

This kind of sounds like distraction from the upcoming main event. Make it sound like disclosure is coming so we don't notice all the criminal and treason charges for democrats? Isn't this usually the way it goes?

Cheers - Dave

a reply to: beetee

I'm sure Greenewald can mess up too, and get carried away, but we should not be shooting the messenger. I think the distrust should be aimed where it belongs, either towards the people at TTSA for not being completely honest or towards the Pentagon for being deceptive in their replies. I bear no ill will towards Elizondo, but I think he should clear this up.

I was not trying to trash Greenewald nor Elizondo. I was simply shocked to what I heard Greenewald say. At this point it could be all misinformation coming direct from the Pentagon. They are experts at it.

a reply to: bobs_uruncle

Absolute along with Iran.