Trying to resolve 9/11

a reply to: kwakakev

Here’s an idea for WTC 1 and WTC 2. It’s established the collapse of each building was initiated from the areas of jet impacts. How about explaining how controlled demolition systems survive jet impacts that took out vertical columns and floor slabs and survived wide spread fires to initiate collapse from the floors most affected by the jet impacts.

Controlled demolitions is a no starter from the get go......

originally posted by: kwakakev
a reply to: mrthumpy

What thermite does is BURN VERY FAST

We can kinda agree on this. It does get to a very high temperature very fast. As for the burn, this depends on how much fuel is available. Takes a lot longer to burn a big tree than it does a little stick.

Oh he's sooo close to getting it!. So you do realise that it would take A LOT OF THERMITE TO BURN FOR THREE MONTHS

a reply to: mrthumpy

It did take a lot of thermite to get it all started. Once a fire on that scale is well and truly established, the results speak for themselves.

originally posted by: kwakakev
a reply to: mrthumpy

It did take a lot of thermite to get it all started. Once a fire on that scale is well and truly established, the results speak for themselves.

Congratulations on using 28 words to say absolutely nothing. That's qute an achievement

a reply to: kwakakev

Nice to ignore there is no possible way CD systems would survive the jet impacts to actuate. And there is zero evidence of thermite at the WTC.

a reply to: kwakakev

Nice to ignore there is no possible way CD systems would survive the jet impacts to actuate. And there is zero evidence of thermite at the WTC.

a reply to: neutronflux

CD systems

Do not understand. Do you me like music CD?

And there is zero evidence of thermite at the WTC

Do not agree.

a reply to: mrthumpy

Congratulations on using 28 words to say absolutely nothing. That's qute an achievement

Thanks, nice to know I am getting there.

originally posted by: kwakakev
a reply to: mrthumpy

Congratulations on using 28 words to say absolutely nothing. That's qute an achievement

Thanks, nice to know I am getting there.

Yes you're definitely managing to avoid dealing with the absurd claim you made. Standard procedure for a Truther avoiding the truth.

(of course you would have to understand what you're claiming to see how absurd it is and that would involve thinking it through)

a reply to: kwakakev

Yes, compact discs brought down the WTC.
Not...

CD is short for controlled demolitions. Any system would not have survived the jet impacts and fires. WTC CD is a no starter.

And all the evidence you have provided has been debunked repeatedly over the years concerning thermite. Start some balanced research. Come on out of the rabbit hole.

a reply to: mrthumpy

For a more detailed take on the whole thermite case:

Once the plan was approved upon by the state, work began on implementation. We have one of the Presidents nephews take control of security at WTC, helps to keep this stuff close in the family. Larry Silverstein got a lease on the buildings and made sure the insurance was up to date.

It took months to properly plan and implement the necessary things for a controlled demolition on the scale of WTC, as it does. These things do not happen overnight. Different programs went on in the building under different covers. We have the Israelites quickly popping their head up again to document the event in a room full of demolition equipment along the way. Once most of the hard preparation work was done and in the final week to countdown, the sniffer dogs where taken away and the explosives, thermite and what ever else they used to bring it all down was put in place.

After the planes hit and the data transfers had taken place, Larry Silverstein in coordination with Richard Cheney, gave the command to his team to 'Pull it'. Richard was the one in control that day with his seat at the Pentagon and the one who had to keep it all together. GW Bush just lost it at trying to pull this off so they stuck him back in class while it went on. Not much GW Bush could do, he was born into it with his father and the CIA.

a reply to: neutronflux

Any system would not have survived the jet impacts and fires.

When you perform a controlled demolition you do not put explosives in just one spot, you put them out through the whole building. When the planes hit the towers they did not hit the whole building, just a small part of it. It all took time to plan and prepare, the system of controlled demolition they used accounted for a plane strike amongst a small part of the overall package.

originally posted by: kwakakev
a reply to: neutronflux

Any system would not have survived the jet impacts and fires.

When you perform a controlled demolition you do not put explosives in just one spot, you put them out through the whole building. When the planes hit the towers they did not hit the whole building, just a small part of it. It all took time to plan and prepare, the system of controlled demolition they used accounted for a plane strike amongst a small part of the overall package.

You are not getting it. The collapse as shown on video was initiated at the areas of jet impacts.

There is no evidence of CD.

You are ranting about innuendo.

I want actual evidence of cut columns. Not rants, innuendo, and truth movement junk science.

a reply to: neutronflux

a reply to: kwakakev

That chunk of engine, was on a direct line from the crash site and left evidence in its wake of its path through the foilage. Again, it was attached to the aircraft up until impact with the ground.

a reply to: mrthumpy

of course you would have to understand what you're claiming to see how absurd it is and that would involve thinking it through

Hell yeah is sounds absurd. The whole thing sounds like some Steven King meets Tom Clancy in a satanic ritual. Absurd, totally.

a reply to: kwakakev

The inanimate objects are not lying. You just refuse to accept that those objects do not tell the story you think they do.

a reply to: cardinalfan0596

That chunk of engine, was on a direct line from the crash site and left evidence in its wake of its path through the foilage. Again, it was attached to the aircraft up until impact with the ground.

I would love to see some evidence of that. Until then hearing an engine roll at least 1/2 mile away from the impact point has my Bull# alert going off. The inconsistencies are too thick on this one.

a reply to: kwakakev

Ok?

If the mental was melted as in molten, then it would be picked up in pieces holding its shape. A normal wood fire can make steel glow.

Then a bunch of structural steel with broken welds. Not melted by thermite.

Another swing and a miss by you.

a reply to: kwakakev

Ok?

If the mental was melted as in molten, then it would be picked up in pieces holding its shape. A normal wood fire can make steel glow.

Then a bunch of structural steel with broken welds. Not melted by thermite.

Another swing and a miss by you.