It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
Midterms proved what 2020 will look like.
Of course if the president and russia are still working together then ya never know but hopefully he wont be that STUPID again.
According to the esteemed polling experts at Quinnipiac University
American voters prefer a President who will not only turn back the clock, but one who gropes, kisses, fondles, and sniffs people of all ages, to show his affection.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: carewemust
when they gave candidate Donald Trump only a 3% chance of winning. (Hillary Clinton was given a 97% chance of winning, right up to election day.)
The numbers were never this. Not ever. Why?
But you dont really expect to repeat 2016 do you?
Oh thats funny.
The american people know what he's like now.
Midterms proved what 2020 will look like.
Of course if the president and russia are still working together then ya never know but hopefully he wont be that STUPID again.
originally posted by: dubiousatworst
Reminder that if pollsters are not reporting raw numbers and how they got those numbers, they are hiding something. It would not surprise me if the people they polled were biased to begin with.
Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics.
In polling methodology and being clear with that methodology, while also reporting secondary characteristics is of utmost importance.
You can skew poll numbers by something as simple as method of collection, such as the common one, phone calls. Yes, they call random land line phone numbers in some of these polls during working hours. It does not take a genius to figure out that that instills bias.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: tanstaafl
Except Trump has deviated from that norm in a bigly way...
No he hasn't, he's just as much of a partisan as every other person who's come before him and constantly panders to his base.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: carewemust
when they gave candidate Donald Trump only a 3% chance of winning. (Hillary Clinton was given a 97% chance of winning, right up to election day.)
The numbers were never this. Not ever. Why?
But you dont really expect to repeat 2016 do you?
Oh thats funny.
The american people know what he's like now.
Midterms proved what 2020 will look like.
Of course if the president and russia are still working together then ya never know but hopefully he wont be that STUPID again.
originally posted by: TDawg61
Keep those polls coming!You Democrats can stay home election day because the"Polls"have Biden by a landslide.lol
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
"He's the first President in my lifetime who has actually strived to - and successfully in most cases - actually keep all of his campaign promises."
That's some serious fanboi action there.
originally posted by: InTheLight
As far as polls go and their bias and accuracy, I will be looking at the Trafalgar Group's polls because their +/- bias rating is very low.
fivethirtyeight.com...
originally posted by: 0zzymand0s
a reply to: carewemust
As a lifelong liberal (not "progressive" enough for my peers I guess) I fully support the second swearing in of President Trump. The democrats are utterly ridiculous at this point.
originally posted by: tanstaafl
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
"He's the first President in my lifetime who has actually strived to - and successfully in most cases - actually keep all of his campaign promises."
That's some serious fanboi action there.
Not sure what you mean. He does a lot of crap I don't like...
But fact s are facts...
originally posted by: LSU2018
originally posted by: InTheLight
As far as polls go and their bias and accuracy, I will be looking at the Trafalgar Group's polls because their +/- bias rating is very low.
fivethirtyeight.com...
If I'm not mistaken, 538 had Trump with a 3% chance of winning like all the other nerds.