How about not telling us Glacier in NP is growing?

a reply to: 727Sky

Remember when that christian radio owner predicted the rapture and it came and went and nothing happened? He was summarily mocked and pushed off the stage. Not so with CAGW. Why?

a reply to: Dfairlite

Why no fair handling of the data? Because the UN has an agenda. The truth be damned they are playing to win.

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: 727Sky
a reply to: Justoneman

Yep I saw this a few days ago. It is just one more prediction of a 10 year doom scenario they make that never comes true. No worry they just reset the clock to another 10 years for their newer better bigger we are all doomed B.S...

I have told my family I sense an attitude from the MSM talking heads all the time of arrogance too. No matter the subject they project a case of the ass about why we aren't afraid enough yet? Doom porn de jour.

With all the failed climate model predictions why do the alarmist continue to get airtime or anyone believe anything they say ? If one checks the actual data compared to what comes out of an Alarmist mouth it is quite simple to see they are misspeaking or just lying to promote their NWO agenda 21 B.S....and IMO that is exactly what all of this is about..youtu.be...

originally posted by: Justoneman
Hear it now believe it later, We are played like violins/fiddles.

If it fits the Doom Porn UN version of AGW, or the lie of the month you will be being rosined up. This is why I can't trust them to handle any data analysis.
www.redstate.com...

Officials at Glacier National Park (GNP) have begun quietly removing and altering signs and government literature which told visitors that the Park’s glaciers were all expected to disappear by either 2020 or 2030. In recent years the National Park Service prominently featured brochures, signs and films which boldly proclaimed that all glaciers at GNP were melting away rapidly. But now officials at GNP seem to be scrambling to hide or replace their previous hysterical claims while avoiding any notice to the public that the claims were inaccurate.

Stuff just like that awakened me from lurker when I started. Those lies I saw repeated by a certain group had me finding the best research and studying the characters and realizing I needed to speak up for my chosen career of environmental scientist.

These lies hurt people trying to discern the truth in the various fields of science. We are almost all lumped in with the bad by the public. And for disagreeing with the Religion of Man Made Climate Change we are treated badly in the MSM propaganda machine. So, I chose sticking to considering what I can prove to myself is the truth so that I can do it with conviction. When I mess up, I will admit it. I hope to be that person every day so that when something important needs to be shared it can be taken at face value that I am perhaps anal about it analysis. The 1st 4 letters of analysis.

Last year the Park Service quietly removed its two large steel trash cans at the Many Glacier Hotel which depicted “before and after” engravings of the Grinnell Glacier in 1910 and 2009. The steel carvings indicated that the Glacier had shrunk significantly between the two dates. But a viral video published on Wattsupwiththat.com showed that the Grinnell Glacier appears to be slightly larger than in 2009.

Telling it like it really is can be hard for others to swallow. No you can't drink from well water without testing it first!

Any evidence of growing glaciers? I'm not seeing any in your link

a reply to: TheSkunk

Yes. Most of it is on land, but not all, more then a bit of it is in water.
East and west antartica

And the north pole is just free floating ice. Either way, not that great of a change even if all the landlocked ice melted. Which again, is not looking likely. Unless some meteors slams into the ice sheets. Then the fun can begin. And it wont be the slight rise in ocean level that will kill you. More like the tsunamis and raining mud and clouds for months that will likely get ya.

Here the water in a cup thing again. Just in case people missed it the first time. Or somebody else decides to add more comments.

a reply to: Justoneman

Here is a video with some history about the sign change.. I had not realized they had been predicting the glaciers would be gone for just about 100 years..They have changed their predictions several times because nature just doesn't seem to care what some government or scientist seem to say. youtu.be...

a reply to: 727Sky

Priceless find 727Sky. Stars galore!

So, that shows us Mr Thumpy didn't try very hard did he? Mr Thumpy, I will not do your thinking for you. I provided you a fact to digest it is up to you to do research as we have. Get several opinions not just one side. That is the only way.

originally posted by: Justoneman
a reply to: 727Sky

Priceless find 727Sky. Stars galore!

So, that shows us Mr Thumpy didn't try very hard did he? Mr Thumpy, I will not do your thinking for you. I provided you a fact to digest it is up to you to do research as we have. Get several opinions not just one side. That is the only way.

OK if you haven't got any then fair enough. I figured since you started this thread you might have looked into the claim first

Do you at least know which of the glaciers you're talking about?

a reply to: mrthumpy

That is on you not me. I have provided the facts.

climate.nasa.gov...

Just the very 1st one even Google found.

Another
wattsupwiththat.com...

Now go read like I think we are obligated to do if we EVER want to know the facts.

originally posted by: Justoneman
climate.nasa.gov...

Just the very 1st one even Google found.

Sorry, I thought this thread was about a glacier in Glacier National Park

a reply to: mrthumpy
Dr Mann?

Sorry, but you lost your defamation lawsuits to Dr Tim Ball 3 times you charlatan at IPCC.

originally posted by: Justoneman
a reply to: mrthumpy
Dr Mann?

Sorry, but you lost your defamation lawsuits to Dr Tim Ball 3 times you charlatan at IPCC.

Did you reply to the wrong person there?

originally posted by: mrthumpy

originally posted by: Justoneman
a reply to: mrthumpy
Dr Mann?

Sorry, but you lost your defamation lawsuits to Dr Tim Ball 3 times you charlatan at IPCC.

Did you reply to the wrong person there?

If you say so Dr Mann.

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: mrthumpy

originally posted by: Justoneman
a reply to: mrthumpy
Dr Mann?

Sorry, but you lost your defamation lawsuits to Dr Tim Ball 3 times you charlatan at IPCC.

Did you reply to the wrong person there?

If you say so Dr Mann.

Odd way of avoiding providing evidence to support your claim

originally posted by: rickymouse

We are altering the way energy flows through the crust of the earth, that causes change.

recently I have been toying with the idea of our galactic core utilizing a form of alternating currents, reversing energy flow periodically.

seeing as everything is interconnected, I suppose this could apply to the planets as well.

a reply to: njord

That sounds like it has potential.

a reply to: mrthumpy

I see, that so far, you still didn't look at the NASA data I provided in this thread.

ETA

You could suggest why you think you cant trust this NASA data. Yet seem to be willing to trust data that has holes in it without a doubt such as Al Gore and his bogus theory that said polar bears would die out, flooding coasts would destroy the coastal cities and children everywhere are never seeing snow again

originally posted by: Justoneman
a reply to: mrthumpy

I see, that so far, you still didn't look at the NASA data I provided in this thread.

You didn't provide any.