Looking for a better map of the Atlantic ocean

a reply to: LABTECH767

I actually believe both activity's occurred, there was an impact as well during the period.

I do as well, except not impact, but, contact. A controlled contact with one intention. Destroy as many life forms as possible, through flooding.

There is no witness accounts of this "Contact", because those that were in a position to witness it, were succumb by it. And besides, the location of the contact would have been very sparsely populated, to none at all. The accounts I have read said storms, earthquakes, night time during the day. And then the great walls of water left their beds in the oceans. Tsunamis miles high.

I have also read accounts where the Sun used to come up in the west, and will again. How does one change the rotation of a planet? Another is of the proselenian people who state, the moon wasn't always there.
When the Earth was Moonless

I have read where the "gods" themselves admit going to the moon, but not revealing technical details of the event.
The gods themselves admitting they arrived here on earth in a "Celestial Chariot", and use "rocket ships" to go to and from it, to earth.



If our ancient history has any basis in reality, which I do believe, then one might consider that "impact" was actually a controlled, contact. Is there evidence for this? I would say, yes. But it all depends on how, or should I say, what frame of mind your in. There are marks in the ocean beds that go against the natural spreading of the planet. They appear to have been created by a rather large sphere being dragged over the beds of the ocean. To me, some are aligned north and south, which may have been done to change the angle of the planet to the sun, gave us seasons. The other east to west, west to east, appears to have been used to stop, and revers the rotation of the planet. Fortunate for us these features have not been smudged out by google, yet. Now I would ask the reader to look at those big dark circles on the moon, in a new light. What would a dry, dusty, big sphere look like, if it came into contact, with water... And yes, the diameters of those smudge marks on the beds of our oceans coincide with the diameters of those Lunar Dark Circles.

As the moon moves closer to earth you could expect, storms and earthquakes at a increasing intensity. The moon would start to block out the Sun during the day. Earth quakes would intensify, even continental tilting would occur. Minor coastal flooding would increase flooding further inland. Then, touchdown. Today, the speed of rotation is 1,000 miles an hour, but no way to know what it was prior. As the rotation is reduced over a period of 2 hours, the land masses stop, but the oceans continue at speed. They leave their beds at 1,000 miles an hour, building into very large Tsunamis over running the continents, wiping away any coastal communities. Some smaller continents would be completely over washed while the larger ones interiors and high mountains would be untouched. As the planet rotation is started again in the opposite direction the oceans would tend to wash in the opposite direction, with less force, but non the less, destroy coastal communities on the opposite coast lines. After a period of time the earth would recover its equilibrium, oceans would settle, continents would settle back down, and life would re sprout.

To me, when I look up at the moon at night, and see those big dark circles, its a reminder, of what happened. Its almost a warning. Because instead of hiding the evidence on the "Dark Side", they left them in plane sight, intentionally. But that, is my "Lunacy"...

We, as a people are left with two choices, we accept the way things are, or we finally unite, and...........

a reply to: All Seeing Eye

I know it is a bit off topic, I believe you have some very good point's and would point you to the ruin's on mars - don't know if you are a fellow believer but here are some great images.
marsruins.com...

Then there are theory's by some that the solar system was once home to an incredibly advanced civilization or at least an outpost of one.
www.enterprisemission.com...

Given the potential that Mars was perhaps attacked by a predator civilization - whom may be responsible also for the demise of the super civilization at least in our region of space of which Mars may or may not have been a part as indeed could both the Earth and Venus it is more than likely that a periodic sweep of our solar system may still occur on occasion and if they find any evidence of advanced technology then the offending planet is put back down or as may be the case with mars - and possibly Venus (though if Venus was every habitable and I believe it once was it may have been a natural outcome of solar radiation slowly increasing as our sun get's older).

There are a great many clues such as the unusual structure of Iapetus that it too could be an artifact - for a soft body collision to create a perfect line around it' equator would be almost astronomically improbably as both body's in the soft collision would have had to have equal density and mass so I don't buy that official explanation for that moon's equatorial mountain range.


Then again our entire solar system seem's almost to perfect, engineered and as a believer in God I already have one valid answer for my own belief but it is worth thinking on.

a reply to: LABTECH767

don't know if you are a fellow believer but here are some great images.
marsruins.com...

I haven't seen some of those photos before, but now seeing them, it reminds me of some of the ruins around the Richat Structure ( 20°42'55.75"N 11°52'21.92"W), and in South Africa. Even today, the same structures are in use by the indigenous of the area.

I too agree, Mars was Nuked! Enki, in his lost book describes the destruction of Mars. He admitted it was inhabited. Undoubtedly, the weapons used were enough to blow the atmosphere into space. I never believed "Solar Winds" were responsible. They also were used on Earth, leaving nothing but "Deserts" in the locations they were used.

Given the potential that Mars was perhaps attacked by a predator civilization

Anu, Enki, Enlil, were the representatives of that Predator Civilization, here, and on Mars, no doubt. But I have a suspicion that they, are not from deep space, but evolved right here on Earth. Millions of Years ago they left Earth to live on another planet, or simply live within the moons of Saturn. Though, there is the possibility they are from elsewhere, I kind of doubt it. It may be, the gray bio robots did come from elsewhere in a "Celestial Chariot", to spread the seeds of life.. and created intelligent life.

The cold hard fact is, if we wish to remain a species, one day, we will have to submit, or, defeat, that Predator.

Then again our entire solar system seem's almost to perfect, engineered and as a believer in God I already have one valid answer for my own belief but it is worth thinking on.

Two things I believe in, Angels and our Divine Creator. Everything else, is debatable

a reply to: All Seeing Eye

If a huge asteroid landed in the ocean, it is still highly unlikely that the generated tsunami would be "miles high"* anywhere other than the local impact site. And, quite simply, the phyiscs of wave dynamics do not support the idea (that Hollywood loves) that such a tsunami could cover a continent. The physics don't support it and neither does the fossil or geological record. Sorry doom porn lovers, it just isn't true.

* If the asteroid hit just off shore into very deep water then you have the potential for a tsunami hitting the shoreline a couple of miles high but this would soon dissipate, unlike in Hollywood.

If an asteroid hits the ocean, does it ake a tsunami? (probably not)

originally posted by: Flavian
a reply to: All Seeing Eye

If a huge asteroid landed in the ocean, it is still highly unlikely that the generated tsunami would be "miles high"* anywhere other than the local impact site. And, quite simply, the phyiscs of wave dynamics do not support the idea (that Hollywood loves) that such a tsunami could cover a continent. The physics don't support it and neither does the fossil or geological record. Sorry doom porn lovers, it just isn't true.

* If the asteroid hit just off shore into very deep water then you have the potential for a tsunami hitting the shoreline a couple of miles high but this would soon dissipate, unlike in Hollywood.

If an asteroid hits the ocean, does it ake a tsunami? (probably not)

Oh, I agree. It would not have the energy required for a global flood.

originally posted by: Flavian
a reply to: All Seeing Eye

If a huge asteroid landed in the ocean, it is still highly unlikely that the generated tsunami would be "miles high"* anywhere other than the local impact site. And, quite simply, the phyiscs of wave dynamics do not support the idea (that Hollywood loves) that such a tsunami could cover a continent. The physics don't support it and neither does the fossil or geological record. Sorry doom porn lovers, it just isn't true.

* If the asteroid hit just off shore into very deep water then you have the potential for a tsunami hitting the shoreline a couple of miles high but this would soon dissipate, unlike in Hollywood.

If an asteroid hits the ocean, does it ake a tsunami? (probably not)

Oh, I agree. It would not have the energy required for a global flood.

I would be very interested to see a map of the Atlantic Ocean
that showed what it was like with 400 ft lower sea levels

Especially around the Azores, which fits Plato's description

curiosmos.com...

a reply to: Flavian

Are we talking Static or Dynamic model here and are we including potential external and potentially internal gravitational influence, external due to matters which would have and may have affected the entire solar system - see Velikovsky you may not agree but there is actually not much wrong with his model that a physicists and believer could not mend if they so chose rather than simply try to poke holes in it - I do not however believe Venus was the body responsible though you know it does have a number of unexplained eccentricity's which still hold a lot of questions (it is also the TRUE twin of earth almost identical in size only a slight bit smaller, has two continental highland's and a planet wide ocean basin/lowland and tectonic plates just like the earth but not only are it's ocean's boiled away having now also lost most of there hydrogen to space but also most or all rock bound gas has been heated enough to also add to it's dense super heated atmosphere making it's surface hot enough to melt lead and dense enough to bend light almost as if the atmosphere was liquid in it's density at ground level not that much light get's through it's permanent cloud layer made up of sulfuric acid which rain's but never reaches the ground, some of Venus highest mountain's though have a rare metallic snow - but you know perhaps not really that long ago Venus could still have been a habitable planet, it ocean's liquid on it's surface, it's atmosphere surprisingly less dense than you might think and that was in the past when our sun was also cooler and younger, at about the same time the earth was frozen from pole to pole in a serious of super ice ages called the snow ball earth period - oddly that mean's our solar system may have had not one but two potentially habitable world's back then and in fact the earth was neither of them with life here trapped down by deep sea vent's and chemosynthetic in nature.

Internal due to magma density variance beneath the crust would also cause a surface regional gravitational differential.

Now if the earth was just a simply solid block of mass, no movement and the galaxy and universe in general was like clockwork without the odd spanner thrown into it's work's then your point would have more merit.

What if I were to tell you that tidal waves of immense proportion may have rolled into India as far as the foothill's of the Himalayas and washed over much of northern Africa leaving vast flood deposits that and vast rapidly created deep gorges eroded in surprisingly short time in the Deccan's.

Of course you would deny it and I would not be able to prove it but belief and fact are not always the same thing on both sides of that old debate now are they.











These may seem unrelated but are worth considering, the fact is we only know what we know based on IDEAS based on Observation's that have only really taken place in a snapshot time period of our universe, the earth could have and indeed we do know has experienced such event's as entire continent's forming at least seven time's before the material we today call continent's during the earlier period of the earth's history, the earth is also immensely active even today with our crust actually being extremely small compared to the entire size of the plant and perhaps deep gas pocket's form beneath the crust on occasion were there is also more water trapped than there is on the surface (so gas pocket's do form) and sometime's these gas pocket's can also play a part - as in the legend of Mu/Lemuria which was supposedly sunk when a gas pocket beneath the continent broke out of the crust - allowing the continent whose underlying plate was over that gas pocket to sink back down into the crust.

Ever make oatmeal, put a spoon on the skin that forms while you cook it gently and watch how while you push part down the areas around it bulge, also watch how the gas sometime's form's a mound then pops as the bubble finally break's out of the skin.

Most of our ocean plate's are made of iron richer material while our continental land mass are richer in aluminium so they are not dependent upon such an activity but that does not mean such a geological function has not and can not occur in the past and the future or even today.
Think about a pressure cooker - the crust as the lid.

originally posted by: njord
I would be very interested to see a map of the Atlantic Ocean
that showed what it was like with 400 ft lower sea levels

Especially around the Azores, which fits Plato's description

curiosmos.com...

In deciphering the ancient story one must take into account the amount of time that has transpired, and the languages it has been told in. Much latitude must be given to it.

The Azores I would imagine were part of the Dominion of Atlantis, as the Canary Islands, and possibly Madeira. Even in those times the location of the Island City may not have been known by the general populations to the north. They may only have known the general direction the "Enemy" came from. "From Beyond the Pillars".

It appears that dropping the sea level 400' would not add any considerable land mass. Some, yes, but not enough to place the City Island there. The discovered Pyramid would add strength to a connection to Atlantis.

Plato, maybe unknown to him, was describing one of the outposts and the city of Atlantis as though they were in the same location. Another outpost could very well be the the Americas.

As pointed out from the below link, King Atlas of Atlantis, was also know by The King of Mauretania. Again, by the Roman language.

“Mauri,” from which “Mauretania” is derived, was the Roman term for the Berber kingdoms of North Africa. But this is also where the Atlas mountains are located. In fact ádrār in Berber means “mountain.” The Atlantic Ocean was named after Atlas and so was the lost island of Atlantis. Moroccans seem to have been great geographers. Ibn-Batuta was from Morocco too.

Side Note:

I always thought “atlases” — books of maps, that is — were named after Atlas, the Greek titan who carries the earth on his shoulders (see above). And it is indeed he who appears on an engraving of Tavole Moderne Di Geografia De La Maggior Parte Del Mondo Di Diversi Autori , a collection of maps published by Antonio Lafreri in 1572. However, it was Gerardus Mercator, the legendary map-maker, who invented the term and apparently he did not have the Greek titan in mind at all but rather “Atlas of Mauretania,” a famous philosopher, mathematician, and astronomer, who also was king of Mauretania.

Unknown to him, the two were actually, one in the same.

" a famous philosopher, mathematician, and astronomer" , having command of knowledge like this, undoubtedly, he knew the planet, and how to navigate it. And most likely did.

Atlas of Mauretania

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye

Oh, I agree. It would not have the energy required for a global flood.

It is possible, if it smashed into a massive Glacier

Releasing a torrent of water powerful enough to carve out the Grand Canyon

originally posted by: njord

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye

Oh, I agree. It would not have the energy required for a global flood.

It is possible, if it smashed into a massive Glacier

Releasing a torrent of water powerful enough to carve out the Grand Canyon

I propose a controlled stopping of the rotation of the planet. As the ocean beds would leave their place, so too would the polar ice caps. This would have shed a great deal of ice into the surrounding seas, to melt. And naturally raising the sea levels according to the amount of ice that was shed.

The idea of a meteorite hitting a glacier would produce at best a local melt and flood but could not flood the entire planet.

Stopping the rotation of the planet would not stop the rotating water (1,000 hr). Almost half the volume of the pacific would have rushed in the North American Continent for a very long distance. Eventually that water is going to want to go back to its original level. The revers flooding would have been monumental, to the point of creating great run off rivers as wide as, well, the Grand Canyon! Leaving oddly shaped remnants not eroded, Take a trip through Arizona, Utah, etc.

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye

originally posted by: njord

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye

Oh, I agree. It would not have the energy required for a global flood.

It is possible, if it smashed into a massive Glacier

Releasing a torrent of water powerful enough to carve out the Grand Canyon

I propose a controlled stopping of the rotation of the planet. As the ocean beds would leave their place, so too would the polar ice caps. This would have shed a great deal of ice into the surrounding seas, to melt. And naturally raising the sea levels according to the amount of ice that was shed.

The idea of a meteorite hitting a glacier would produce at best a local melt and flood but could not flood the entire planet.

Stopping the rotation of the planet would not stop the rotating water (1,000 hr). Almost half the volume of the pacific would have rushed in the North American Continent for a very long distance. Eventually that water is going to want to go back to its original level. The revers flooding would have been monumental, to the point of creating great run off rivers as wide as, well, the Grand Canyon! Leaving oddly shaped remnants not eroded, Take a trip through Arizona, Utah, etc.

Its called a Vlar Global Continental Displacement Wave Event....and it happens before the rotation stops....before the rotation stops the Continents are pulled towards the catalyst which is magnetically pulling on the Earth to slow rotation as the catalyst/mass passes between Earth and Sun.This is a repeatable Model.

originally posted by: one4all

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye

originally posted by: njord

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye

Oh, I agree. It would not have the energy required for a global flood.

It is possible, if it smashed into a massive Glacier

Releasing a torrent of water powerful enough to carve out the Grand Canyon

I propose a controlled stopping of the rotation of the planet. As the ocean beds would leave their place, so too would the polar ice caps. This would have shed a great deal of ice into the surrounding seas, to melt. And naturally raising the sea levels according to the amount of ice that was shed.

The idea of a meteorite hitting a glacier would produce at best a local melt and flood but could not flood the entire planet.

Stopping the rotation of the planet would not stop the rotating water (1,000 hr). Almost half the volume of the pacific would have rushed in the North American Continent for a very long distance. Eventually that water is going to want to go back to its original level. The revers flooding would have been monumental, to the point of creating great run off rivers as wide as, well, the Grand Canyon! Leaving oddly shaped remnants not eroded, Take a trip through Arizona, Utah, etc.

Its called a Vlar Global Continental Displacement Wave Event....and it happens before the rotation stops....before the rotation stops the Continents are pulled towards the catalyst which is magnetically pulling on the Earth to slow rotation as the catalyst/mass passes between Earth and Sun.This is a repeatable Model.

Before you brought this up I knew nothing of this. "Displacement Wave" theory. Though, it is exactly what would happen if "Catalyst" were to move closer.

I just did a very brief search for the Vlar event and found very little. But I did come across this:

The Earth crust displacement theory by Charles H. Hapgood

Very quickly going over his theory, which is a bit difficult to comprehend, the continents slide on a molten ocean below our feet, changing the locations of the north and south pole. I'm sure I have that wrong.

But while reading I couldn't get past the Piri Reis Map. Zoomed in to the west coast of Africa, and since researching the coast line noticed a river that presently is not there, but shown on the map. It also depicts elephants in the middle of a desert, Plus, what appears to be a King on his throne. And of great interest, a circular river system further in. I would assume that is the "Eye".

I'm interested in this area to try and identify the river bed because I believe ancient ruins will be found around that river, that supported the Atlantis inland Island.

Any difference in his theory and mine? I name the "Catalyst".

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye

originally posted by: one4all

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye

originally posted by: njord

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye

Oh, I agree. It would not have the energy required for a global flood.

It is possible, if it smashed into a massive Glacier

Releasing a torrent of water powerful enough to carve out the Grand Canyon

I propose a controlled stopping of the rotation of the planet. As the ocean beds would leave their place, so too would the polar ice caps. This would have shed a great deal of ice into the surrounding seas, to melt. And naturally raising the sea levels according to the amount of ice that was shed.

The idea of a meteorite hitting a glacier would produce at best a local melt and flood but could not flood the entire planet.

Stopping the rotation of the planet would not stop the rotating water (1,000 hr). Almost half the volume of the pacific would have rushed in the North American Continent for a very long distance. Eventually that water is going to want to go back to its original level. The revers flooding would have been monumental, to the point of creating great run off rivers as wide as, well, the Grand Canyon! Leaving oddly shaped remnants not eroded, Take a trip through Arizona, Utah, etc.

Its called a Vlar Global Continental Displacement Wave Event....and it happens before the rotation stops....before the rotation stops the Continents are pulled towards the catalyst which is magnetically pulling on the Earth to slow rotation as the catalyst/mass passes between Earth and Sun.This is a repeatable Model.

Before you brought this up I knew nothing of this. "Displacement Wave" theory. Though, it is exactly what would happen if "Catalyst" were to move closer.

I just did a very brief search for the Vlar event and found very little. But I did come across this:

The Earth crust displacement theory by Charles H. Hapgood

Very quickly going over his theory, which is a bit difficult to comprehend, the continents slide on a molten ocean below our feet, changing the locations of the north and south pole. I'm sure I have that wrong.

But while reading I couldn't get past the Piri Reis Map. Zoomed in to the west coast of Africa, and since researching the coast line noticed a river that presently is not there, but shown on the map. It also depicts elephants in the middle of a desert, Plus, what appears to be a King on his throne. And of great interest, a circular river system further in. I would assume that is the "Eye".

I'm interested in this area to try and identify the river bed because I believe ancient ruins will be found around that river, that supported the Atlantis inland Island.

Any difference in his theory and mine? I name the "Catalyst".

They are one-in-the-same...….one4all.....one "catalyst" to explain all of the theories.

I named my personal model the Vlar Global Continental Displacement Wave Model....of course it is a repeatable model....therefore predictable.

There is no hiding from the truth.

Not EVER.

"Catalyst" is the keystone word....we BEGIN with a plausible(evidenced)Catalyst when we construct our VGCDW Model....of course this narrows things down tremendously...….we ONLY USE physical evidence that passes the Eye-Test to vet the Catalyst defined...we do NOT include specific dates or try to define exact timelines to begin with....we are REVERSE EXTRAPOLATING THINGS....using only physical evidence which is validated using the Eye-Test...NOT ACADEMIC BASTARDISED misdirection...

Charles Hapgoods work fits into the Model...as does Velikovskis as does Broussards as does the work of EVERYONE....because there is only ONE TRUTH FOR ALL.....yes everyone is slightly out of focus but we can fix that with a simple basic repeatable model.

Major rivers and Waterways all rebuild their pathways based upon a repeating predictable evidenced MEASURABLE patterns.

Your work also is to be found within the VGCDW Model....seek the "Catalyst" which could have put the Atlantis you believe in where it is and in the current state of affairs it is in....and you will have begun building your very own personalised Vlar Global Continental Displacement wave Model.....you see it doesn't matter the path you choose to take the DESTINATION IS ALWAYS THE SAME....the VGCDW Model.....the UNADULTERED TRUTH....I know the Catalyst you seek....its the same one ALL CORRECT POSTULATIONS.....MUST....MUST BE BASED UPON......there is no other choice....what will you do when you become famous?

Your "Catalyst" is the Catalyst of my VGCDW Model...…. and the catalyst off the VGCDW Model put the Sahara Desert where it is today.One4All.

a reply to: one4all

There is no hiding from the truth.

That is all "they" try to do.

we ONLY USE physical evidence that passes the Eye-Test to vet the Catalyst defined...

That, is true science! Eye test? Love it lol lol

what will you do when you become famous?

I do not seek fame and fortune, I seek, the truth. I come from very humble origins and it is quite impossible for me to change my core. And besides, I realize to some degree all that I see, or allowed to see, is not my doing. To claim otherwise is plagiarism.

But on the other hand, I know of no one else who has taken the intellectual,suicidal leap of faith in naming the "Catalyst". Here, is your Atlantis "Eye Test".

I was considering starting a new thread To compile a case "For" Atlantis Being the Eye of the Sahara. But to be honest, I'm no expert in the history so I'm not really the one to present it.

But again, I have seen enough in the way of ancient ruins, ancient roads, and ancient mines to conclude, this, is the real deal.

Google Earth does not give the proper amount of clarity to examine the surrounding areas, but satellites.pro , does.
And what I have discovered lends a great deal of credence to the "Theory" that Atlantis does not reside in the Atlantic, but in Mauritania. But, if the Great Flood did in fact "Wash away" any evidence, it surly is flushed into the Atlantic. As I understand the building techniques of Atlantis, smaller rocks were used in construction, not megalithic stone. Logically a flood would level any structure, not leaving "Two" stones standing atop each other. At best the ruin would look just like a pile of rocks strewn out, unrecognizable. But, well used roads that wore ruts into the bedrock? That, isn't going anywhere. There are such roads in the area. Not only that, there are ruins, post flood ruins, that showed people tried to return and pick up life after the flood. What they could not predict was the weather and water was not going to return. Those communities failed after a time and were abandon. For one of them, they built on the site of a pre flood community. And there is circumstantial evidence, to prove it.

Anyone interested in "Seeing" it?

originally posted by: LABTECH767
a reply to: StallionDuck

At the end of the last ice age it was not only sea level rise but Sea Bed Depression that you must factor in.

I actually believe the calamity that befell Atlantis was only a symptom of a much larger catastrophe that probably also destroyed other cultures and city's around the world at about or at the same time during an epoch of increased geological activity.

GREAT FLIPPING POST! Thanks Lab for putting all the time an effort into it.

I think people tend to think narrowly and do not realize that if one place sank (Atlantis) then others must have sank too (Mu). It was not a local problem, but a global one.

originally posted by: LABTECH767
a reply to: All Seeing Eye

west of the Straights of Gibraltar (Pillars of Hercules) were supposedly they had found the remain's of a monorail system which had once serviced it

For me it is all about aliens. So that taints everything I look at. But bear with me here and indulge my fantasy.

Hercules was all about strength. If you stuck an ancient mariner in front of what’s in the photo below, he would think Pillars of Strength.

lifehacker.com...

In other words the ancient Pillars of Hercules could have been a bridge between Africa and Europe. We can no longer see it because the ocean level was over 400 feet lower back then and it is under water and probably not standing.
But what does not make sense to me is that if you have a flying society such as the ancient aliens were why would you need a land bridge?

Maybe to support a monorail system?
But a monorail system to where?

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
There are marks in the ocean beds that go against the natural spreading of the planet. They appear to have been created by a rather large sphere being dragged over the beds of the ocean.

And yes, the diameters of those smudge marks on the beds of our oceans coincide with the diameters of those Lunar Dark Circles.

Our OP may disagree, since we are off topic, but you guys have really hit it out of the park with some of these post.

A decade ago I heard the idea of the moon being dragged out of orbit to purposely cause the great flood. But Are you saying the Moon may have been physically dragged across the planet itself?

originally posted by: Flavian
* If the asteroid hit just off shore into very deep water then you have the potential for a tsunami hitting the shoreline a couple of miles high but this would soon dissipate

Speaking of fantasies, are you trying to ruin another of mine?

That’s the one where the comet impact (Holly Hiawatha!) generates a tidal wave that flows over Giza, erasing most of the Sphinx’s head and washing the limestone casing off of the pyramids.

Of course I know if that happened it ruins another fantasy, the one where the comet hit (Holly Hiawatha again!) and caused the Earth to tilt from Magnetic North to where it is today.

Since the Giza pyramids are located on current North, one of those two scenarios could not have happened.

originally posted by: LABTECH767

What if I were to tell you that tidal waves of immense proportion may have rolled into India as far as the foothill's of the Himalayas and washed over much of northern Africa leaving vast flood deposits that and vast rapidly created deep gorges eroded in surprisingly short time in the Deccan's.

Yeah, that's the fantasy I was talking about!