It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
this study found a statistically significant effect on chromatin at 42.0 GHz and 0.15 mW/cm2.
Or are you just going to keep throwing stuff up on the wall to see if no one notices?
Study on dose-dependent, frequency-dependent, and accumulative effects of 1.5 GHz and 2.856 GHz microwave on cognitive functions in Wistar rats
originally posted by: Phage
Tell me, how close do you have to stand next to a cell transmitter to be exposed to 0.15 mW/cm2? For 3 hours?
According to the graph, the highest intensity near the 5G modules will be 30W/m2,
originally posted by: Phage
Apparently you are not aware of the difference between square meters and and square centimeters.
It's substantial.
I made no mistake.
You're making the same mistake I made earlier.
You know that electromagnetic radiation follows the inverse square law, right?
These studies all found biological impairments that are in the power density range permissible by the FCC:
originally posted by: Phage
I made no mistake.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: cooperton
I know how to convert.
Now apply the inverse square law.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: cooperton
What I notice is that it shows no difference in power density with distance.
So, 5G defies the laws of electromagnetic transmission? Or perhaps the graph is bull#.
originally posted by: Phage
I can see that.
Do you know what the inverse square rule is?
There are multiple sources here, which would account for it not being exactly an exponential decrease.
originally posted by: Phage
I concede that point. However I would like to see evidence that the power densities reach those levels.
originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: cooperton
but - is there any ACTUAL " biological danger " - from 5g - as used in the real world ???
radio station transmitters - [ of all types ] are biologically dangerous - and have to be turned off to allow maintainence and repair personell to work on them
ETA - radio has been used for over 115 years - any significant impact on the gen pop ?
You find the lack of replication to be eerie? It's as if you are expecting certain results. That's not very scientific.
The lack of information was kind of eerie.
100Ghz (the top end of the 5G spectrum) is about x1000 higher energy than the highest energy FM radio wave.
originally posted by: Phage
You find the lack of replication to be eerie? It's as if you are expecting certain results. That's not very scientific.
You still haven't shown evidence that 5G will use frequencies that high and you still don't seem to understand what power density is.
But then again everything effect you, the moment you are born, you have begun the slow process of dying. From sunlight to food and everything in between, the moons pull and sway to Jupiter outer rings. To the sway of 5g and beyond. I would not worry about it, or at least not unless it effect you in a dramatic way, and for some it will.