The Bible Code proves God's existence

originally posted by: mekhanics
a reply to: info393

The bible is fake news.

Tell that to the scientists who disagree.

a reply to: CriticalStinker

If you can distill God down to an algorithm then all you need is a laptop for salvation or eternal damnation.

your choice....

a reply to: olaru12

Funny you say that, because distilled algorithms help with the ladies.

Vodka(distilled)+fruity drink+joke= _________

originally posted by: 3n19m470

originally posted by: mekhanics
a reply to: info393

The bible is fake news.

Tell that to the scientists who disagree.

Which scientists would that be? And what makes their word better than their colleagues?

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: olaru12

Funny you say that, because distilled algorithms help with the ladies.

Vodka(distilled)+fruity drink+joke= _________

A priest, a rabbi and a Presbyterian walked into a bar...

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: olaru12

Funny you say that, because distilled algorithms help with the ladies.

Vodka(distilled)+fruity drink+joke= _________

A priest, a rabbi and a Presbyterian walked into a bar...

Unless the bar is Chuckee Cheeses, I don't believe a priest went with them.

I read up on the ALS codes. In time, I was disillusioned because they said things I KNEW were not so. Some of it was just self-serving Zionist propaganda.

Now we have this book titled "SELF," about a 666 code and it runs 666 pages. How neat. It has no intro, no roadmap, just diving right into its subject, leaving us gasping. Still, it may be correct, but the usual ATS jackals bark and howl without having read it. I thought ATS was all about denying ignorance...maybe not.

EDIT: Well, I've looked over the text of the book, and it's GIBBERISH. The author, I'm guessing, is either a manic or a schizophrenic, and the whole thing reads like a fugue.

a reply to: Lazarus Short

I shouldn't have to read 666 pages to have any understanding of what the OP is talking about. All I got from the OP is that it's some sort of bible code that supposedly proves the existence of god. We got no description of how this proves anything. I think it's fair to ask for a little more information.

originally posted by: trustmeimdoctor
a reply to: Lazarus Short

I shouldn't have to read 666 pages to have any understanding of what the OP is talking about. All I got from the OP is that it's some sort of bible code that supposedly proves the existence of god. We got no description of how this proves anything. I think it's fair to ask for a little more information.

It's difficult to get past that first bit about an R&B singer. Further, the lack of author, intro, TOC, chapter breaks and a rational discourse says all I need to know. I did not read all 666 pages either, but what I did read made me want to read no more of it.

a reply to: info393

The only thing the Bible proves is Mans propensity to create/rehash fiction and offer it up, pass it off, as fact.

Not suggesting there are not hidden meanings and/or codes contained within the collection of religious texts but that does not prove God's existence any more than the Sun rising in the morning does.

originally posted by: info393
This book called "SELF" is much more advanced than the "Equidistant Letter Sequences" which have gotten so much attention, this new Code goes way beyond that, and actually proves God's existence. I was never too impressed with the whole Equidistant code because I always wondered "Where in the bible does it say to do any of this?" There was no riddle in the bible that tells you "Skip 20 letters in Genesis and you will see the name of Jesus". And I think that if you're saying that a code is in the bible, the bible also has to say it too. No matter what you find, if the bible didn't tell you to engage in that code or game, then you haven't found anything because the bible never consciously says that it is in on the game. But in the book "SELF" there is Revelation 13:18 that directly tells the readers to engage in the 666 Code and game, and that shows that the bible is conscious of the game and Code. People claimed that the "Equidistant Letter Sequences" were so advanced that not even a super computer could make it happen and therefore they claimed that the Letter Sequences proved God's existence because only a super mind could orchestrate something like that, if the Letter Sequences impressed them that much, then they are going to faint when they see the 666 Code. 666 apparently is a Code that ties into every word and letter in the entire bible from Genesis to Revelation, 666 is a recurring pattern that is very complex. What do you think about the book? Here is a link to it...

www.edocr.com...

That is an extraordinary document.
Almost unreadable in so very many ways, and nothing to do with the bible. Yet extraordinary, never the less.

I give you my thanks.

a reply to: 3n19m470

Tell that to the scientists who disagree.

24,000 manuscript found and none are identical.

Yeah! Scientists my asss!

a reply to: Lazarus Short

I am guessing the author is the OP. they joined ATS and frantically posted one liners in 20 different threads then created this OP. I was hoping for a little more substance from the OP, but they seemed to have made a dash.

Edit add: a reply to: Gogmagog

What did you find so extraordinary?

While you're talking about it, I'm already making a new code that you find repeating throughout the bible if you break down the text of the bible into certain lengths, pieces of sentences, words, letters.

This means this in a biblical language, this number is important because it's in the book. Abra cadabra, you'll find this piece of something that means something for some reason repeating in this manner! *shows you*

Irrefutable proof to the basics looking for a reason to reinforce their fantasy beliefs of dramatic God vs Satan and armageddon plots.

While you're geeking over their material I'm *making* material. That is definitely a pie to take a slice out of. Alternate reality fiction that readers truly believe is real or love to flirt with it, it's so intriguing and exciting. They're.. uncovering the plot, finding more evidence for God. They want to be convinced beyond a shadow of a doubt, which God implemented free will and a strict no signs, wonders, miracles or angel manifestations policy to ensure never happens, else his entire creation is flawed fundamentally.

He left the code in there for people to eventually discover and sell books of though.

originally posted by: CynConcepts
a reply to: Lazarus Short

I am guessing the author is the OP. they joined ATS and frantically posted one liners in 20 different threads then created this OP. I was hoping for a little more substance from the OP, but they seemed to have made a dash.

You seem to be correct, for the OP is offline. I would have expected the OP to hang around to defend the book.

originally posted by: mekhanics
a reply to: 3n19m470

Tell that to the scientists who disagree.

24,000 manuscript found and none are identical.

Yeah! Scientists my asss!

Most of those manuscript variances are simple spelling errors, and easily rectified. Almost none have any bearing on any Christian doctrine or concept. The doctrine of Hell is an exception, but with a little effort, Hell can be relegated to the memory hole.

originally posted by: CynConcepts
a reply to: Lazarus Short

I am guessing the author is the OP. they joined ATS and frantically posted one liners in 20 different threads then created this OP. I was hoping for a little more substance from the OP, but they seemed to have made a dash.

Edit add: a reply to: Gogmagog

What did you find so extraordinary?

Have you read it?

Everything. Length, formatting, content, use of language.

It is a magnificent folly.

a reply to: Gogmagog

No, I haven't attempted to read it. If the OP could not take the time to provide more details on why this was a good read, I was not going to waste my time clicking on their link.

originally posted by: CynConcepts
a reply to: Gogmagog

No, I haven't attempted to read it. If the OP could not take the time to provide more details on why this was a good read, I was not going to waste my time clicking on their link.

It is not a good read. It is barely readable.

Yet I still find it extraordinary that someone wrote it.

originally posted by: Gogmagog

originally posted by: CynConcepts
a reply to: Gogmagog

No, I haven't attempted to read it. If the OP could not take the time to provide more details on why this was a good read, I was not going to waste my time clicking on their link.

It is not a good read. It is barely readable.

Yet I still find it extraordinary that someone wrote it.

Gibberish.

Doggerel.

Rubbish.

Manic outpourings of a deranged mind.

I think it is a fugue.