Hillary Clinton: Anyone other than Trump would have been indicted for obstruction

Two things immediately come to mind, first...If you mess with the bull, you're gonna get the horns".

And second, seriously Hillary, after you destroyed 30,000 emails that were under subpoena...and then wiped the drive...and then took a hammer to your mobile phones ??

“Clinton, the Democratic nominee for president in 2016, argued during a Q&A session in New York that Mueller’s report “could not be clearer” in making the case Trump tried to obstruct the Russia investigation -- even though Mueller did not come to an explicit conclusion on that question.

I think there’s enough there that any other person who had engaged in those acts would certainly have been indicted,” Clinton said at the “Time 100 Summit.” “But because of the rule in the Justice Department that you can’t indict a sitting president, the whole matter of obstruction was very directly sent to the Congress.

She obviously thinks that the Deep State is still firmly in control and that she is immune from further inquiry - or an indictment of her own.

Time will tell, I suppose...but to suggest that Trump is the one who should have been indicted...while she knows that the DOJ is now revisiting the whole question of her (and the FBI's) conduct...private email server, destruction of materials under investigation, pay for play, etc., etc...takes some kind of nerve.

She's a brave one, if not a future felon...

Pot Calling Kettle Black

Ahhhhhh

Bahahaha

Is it joke?

Or senility?

Ahhhhhh

Bahahaha

Is it joke?

Or senility?

There's a mental condition where you block out all the bad things you've done in life to other people career

a reply to: mobiusmale

It probably makes her feel a little better to throw someone under the bus thinking people are really stupid enough to believe her.

a reply to: mobiusmale

This broad really has some nerve... I would guess this move is being made in efforts to put press out there in the event she comes under fire over the Russia hoax falling apart - which i believe is a possible scenario that could happen soon... Once the heat turns up on her, she will say "this is only happening due to the way i spoke about trump "..... i can see it now. She will claim Trump is jailing people with opposing views (or who claimed Impeach Trump!). Like its retaliation or something.

a reply to: mobiusmale

I think the only people that still believe in Hillary are 3 lesbians who own a stall at the local mall that sell purses that are tie-dyed.

The Clinton's have enough skeletons in their closet to qualify as a grave yard.

She shouldn't be talking

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: mobiusmale

I think the only people that still believe in Hillary are 3 lesbians who own a stall at the local mall that sell purses that are tie-dyed.

That's Rachel Maddow's place, right?

a reply to: mobiusmale

And second, seriously Hillary, after you destroyed 30,000 emails that were under subpoena...and then wiped the drive...and then took a hammer to your mobile phones ??

You bring up something is paralleled in the Mueller report. Apparently Trumps team stymied the investigation by losing documents and using applications like whatsapp to send data.

If you agree with me that what Hillary did was wrong. Why then aren't we going after Trumps team after they pretty much did something similar?

originally posted by: jhn7537

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: mobiusmale

I think the only people that still believe in Hillary are 3 lesbians who own a stall at the local mall that sell purses that are tie-dyed.

That's Rachel Maddow's place, right?

No Maddow is the one standing outside the mall with tattered clothes, frizzled hair, and a scribbled cardboard sign about Russia.

a reply to: grey580

Didnt Hillary getting away with it set a new standard of behavior?

originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: mobiusmale

And second, seriously Hillary, after you destroyed 30,000 emails that were under subpoena...and then wiped the drive...and then took a hammer to your mobile phones ??

You bring up something is paralleled in the Mueller report. Apparently Trumps team stymied the investigation by losing documents and using applications like whatsapp to send data.

If you agree with me that what Hillary did was wrong. Why then aren't we going after Trumps team after they pretty much did something similar?

absolutely! The second Hillary is jailed, we need to investigate if Trump deleted any documents or destroyed any evidence. Fair?

Can't she just die already?

a reply to: Bluntone22

No no.

It is hypocritical to claim that you care about one politician doing something wrong. But then when your team does it they get a pass.

Hillary should of gone to jail or been fined for having that server. I agree with that.

We need to also need to agree that what Trumps team has done is wrong and there needs to be an investigation.

Otherwise Republicans have no credibility.

a reply to: network dude

I will agree that Hillary should be taken to court and be tried by a jury of her peers.

If the evidence is sound and shows that she committed a crime. Then jail her ass immediately.

Fair?

a reply to: grey580

Whitehouse staff can use other methods of communication, like WHatsapp, so long as they do not send classified information and take screenshots.

originally posted by: mobiusmale
Hillary Clinton: Anyone other than Trump would have been indicted for obstruction

😆😆😆

a reply to: mobiusmale

WTF.......I have nothing else to add.

a reply to: mobiusmale

but to suggest that Trump is the one who should have been indicted...while she knows that the DOJ is now revisiting the whole question of her (and the FBI's) conduct...private email server, destruction of materials under investigation, pay for play, etc., etc...takes some kind of nerve.

This was another move for her on the table of Politics.
A defensive move that she is setting up to play a victim.
A last minute futile attempt before the coming of the storm.
A pawn in the corner, is the role to which she played the game.