It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Tartuffe
Speaking of not surprised, censorial anti-Trump ATSers applauding the arrest of someone because someone else sent an anonymous online tip to the FBI alleging he said something bad.
But the FBI was working to build a case against the Bundys. Shortly after the Nevada standoff, agents posing as documentary filmmakers with "Longbow Productions" made contact with the family. In "American Patriot," we hear Ammon Bundy on the phone with "Charles Johnson," a supposed filmmaker.
originally posted by: Aazadan
originally posted by: Tartuffe
Speaking of not surprised, censorial anti-Trump ATSers applauding the arrest of someone because someone else sent an anonymous online tip to the FBI alleging he said something bad.
No. Applauding the arrest of a domestic terrorist who is kidnapping brown people at gunpoint to forcibly deport them. And running a radical far right militia that was planning to assassinate members of an opposing political party.
originally posted by: Aazadan
originally posted by: Tartuffe
Speaking of not surprised, censorial anti-Trump ATSers applauding the arrest of someone because someone else sent an anonymous online tip to the FBI alleging he said something bad.
No. Applauding the arrest of a domestic terrorist who is kidnapping brown people at gunpoint to forcibly deport them. And running a radical far right militia that was planning to assassinate members of an opposing political party.
Well said.
originally posted by: Tartuffe
a reply to: odzeandennz
Someone sent an online tip to the FBI. It is an allegation based on hearsay. To pretend he actually said that, to believe the mere accusation that he was plotting to assassinate politicians with no other evidence, is to purchase snake oil and start drinking it.
originally posted by: hillbilly4rent
Dose the justice system only work in one direction. Not that I condone threats or attempts at a sitting or past president. What about the ones holding up severed heads or threats to the current POTUS. Or is it pick and choose.
originally posted by: Aazadan
originally posted by: Tartuffe
Speaking of not surprised, censorial anti-Trump ATSers applauding the arrest of someone because someone else sent an anonymous online tip to the FBI alleging he said something bad.
No. Applauding the arrest of a domestic terrorist who is kidnapping brown people at gunpoint to forcibly deport them. And running a radical far right militia that was planning to assassinate members of an opposing political party.
originally posted by: Rob808
What would be the motivation to do something like that? Maybe a DECADE ago, but now? Smells fishy... a reply to: odzeandennz
originally posted by: Aazadan
originally posted by: Rob808
What would be the motivation to do something like that? Maybe a DECADE ago, but now? Smells fishy... a reply to: odzeandennz
I'm sure it has nothing to do with the fact that Trump has on multiple occasions called for their assassinations. Even just recently he called the Mueller report a coup and said that they needed to be punished like it was a mutiny. Leading several on ATS to start calling for mass arrests, indefinite detention, and in some cases executions of any Democrat in office.