It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
astr0's thread was in the gray area which I try to avoid unless I feel like reading some fiction, or sometimes delusional stories, but in this case fiction. Some people who I thought were true believers and would believe almost anything were even skeptical of astr0's tall tales, but then some people may have believed it. He talked about hearing the voice of a 160,000 year old woman coming from a triangular black artifact or something. Some things he posted in some other threads were apparently true so I heard someone say the way you get people to believe a lie is to sandwich it between two truths, which some have said was astr0's technique. Anyway this is probably what people are talking about, hope you have some hip waders ready because the BS gets really deep.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: yuppa
And that you are serious about the whole affair.
Yet won't even provide me with a brief summary as to why or how.
Or even a link to astros threads on the matter.
originally posted by: 111DPKING111
There are varying opinions on the radar data and the retraction
It is important here to underline that the F-16 pilot saw no UFOs at all. I spoke with some of his friends who had laughed with him about the UFO hypothesis.
I think the fact that it doesn't happen every day helps. Even on the days when it happens, a false positive still provides security if there aren't too many of them, you scramble some planes to check it out and if it turns out it was nothing, then your country was never really threatened. It's not just military radar affected. Here's a weather radar showing a lot of rain that isn't happening, in a similar type of false signal. Radar experts know these things happen sometimes, but some people don't seem to be aware of it:
One does have to wonder how a military goes about its business of defending a country when the radar data it relies on is so faulty.
So in that case you bring an umbrella with you when you didn't really need it, not a big deal.
Radar echoes are NOT real, there was no precipitation occurring in the image above.
You may as well ask what fairie dust would do to radar since we have as much evidence for that as whatever you're talking about which sounds just as made up. Any known effects of gravity on radar are minimal. If you're talking about unknown effects, I put faerie dust in that category, I don't know what effect it would have.
Perhaps the technology of the UFO also interfered with the radar in some way, who knows what gravity propulsion would do to radar?
Or, maybe if some jets did a flyby and saw it was a blimp they might not shoot it down.
If it was just a blimp of sorts, why would any other country risk flying a slow moving object like that in someone elses territory? The US flew the SR-71 over the USSR because they knew it wouldnt be shot down, not the case with a blimp. The mostly likely culprit would be the Belgium military, yet we find them asking the US if it was them.
The shoot off at high speeds I would suppose is maybe an exaggeration similar to the "no noise" exaggeration. They probably did have some reason for saying both of them, like low noise or not much noise but that doesn't mean none, and if they say it sped up, I believe it could have really sped up, but I have little faith in any witness's ability to estimate the speed of an unknown object without some type of calibration reference to determine the speed. I've seen a blimp speed up before so speeding up doesn't mean alien.
The officer sightings that Unsolved Mysteries covers in the Eupen video follows the path of one of the objects as it intersects 3 different sets of officers. Like good little skeptics, we find the officers are making light of the others till they wind up seeing it for themselves. At the last stop at La Calamine, the officers report the object seems to fold up and shoot off at high speeds, no ordinary blimp.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: yuppa
Come on yuppa.
You suggest that these Black Triangles are after or somehow harvesting our thought patterns.
In requirement to somehow jump to another world or star system.
And that you are serious about the whole affair.
Yet won't even provide me with a brief summary as to why or how.
Or even a link to astros threads on the matter.
Your better than that dude.
We have a couple of funny little clowns here on this thread, LOL. RUoTayHun is a just a clown. Arbitrauger is Mr Skeptics' Advocate. Either way, it should be noted that there was a nice video called Crop Circles Decoded that was taken down about a year ago.