-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -Q-

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: RadioRobert
a reply to: Trillium
The Court accepted the argument that the DOJ does not have to provide the documents the court had earlier ordered released.

Is that GOOD or BAD from a Trump/Patriots/Q perspective? The Flynn "matter" has me confused. All I know is that the FBI intentionally trapped this American hero.

No idea.

Backstory. The Washington Post petitioned for information to be released re: Flynn. The judge ordered certain pieces of evidence to be publicly disclosed. The DOJ balked and said it was outside the court's purview because the DOJ was not using that information in sentencing. Then immediately there were political/legal analysts saying Barr placed himself in contempt of court and that Trump 's administration was being lawless and were a danger to the Republic and should be impeached if they did not comply. People pointed out that the court decision was atypical, but that the DOJ should either comply with the order, file a sealed motion to make the case for keeping the documents sealed, or appeal the decision. One does not simply say, "No, we are not going to obey that order" (all true).
What the minute order indicates is that the DOJ ALSO made a sealed motion, and that the judge accepted the reasoning provided. The DOJ does not have to release it.

Which means all the hand-wringing about contempt and lawlessness was just more melodrama.


Example

If the administration defied a court order, all bets are off

Criminal prosecution exacts punishment; impeachment upholds the Constitution and prevents further assaults on it. Many Americans, but far from a majority, think President Trump has committed impeachable acts but are wary of impeaching without hope of removal. However, if there is an indication that severe damage to the Constitution will occur unless Trump is removed, the House must act, and then engage public opinion to pressure the Senate.

On Friday, we might have reached that breaking point. The Post reports: “Federal prosecutors on Friday declined to make public transcripts of recorded conversations between Michael Flynn and Russia’s ambassador to the United States in December 2016, despite a judge’s order.”
...
Constitutional scholar Laurence Tribe tells me, “Even if the district court’s order to release the Flynn-Kislyak transcripts goes further than justified by the sentencing matter before the court, I would’ve thought that, in a government of laws, the only way to avoid compliance is to take an appeal to a higher court.” The government made its arguments to the court, did not obtain a stay to our knowledge and did not seek an emergency appeal. From all appearances, the Trump administration has deliberately and willfully defied a court order.


“Normally when prosecutors don’t want to make something public for national security reasons, etc., they file a document under seal with the judge explaining that reasoning and requesting relief from the presumption that things should be made public,” says former prosecutor Mimi Rocah. “The fact that the government didn’t do that here is puzzling. Instead, they took a very unusual tact of refusing the judge’s order publicly, which suggests that they didn’t think the judge would go along with keeping the material under seal.” Rocah continues, “While it doesn’t necessarily mean they don’t have legitimate motives, the disrespectful and atypical nature of their action makes me suspicious. And it certainly doesn’t mean the judge is just going to say, ’Okay, let’s just forget I asked.’ ”
...
The House should, as a distinct part of its pre-impeachment fact-finding, hold “Hearings on the Defiance of Court Orders and Refusal to Produce Mandated Production of Witness and Documents and Subpoenas.” Make no mistake, Trump’s conduct resembles conduct that was the basis Impeachment Article 3 against Richard M. Nixon...

Blah blah blah

Well, apparently, they did file under seal. You didn't know about it because... It was under seal... Better luck next time!

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi
3 drops on May
#285 - Rothchilds ordered a hit on Theresa May, POTUS informed her.
#2596 - [May, Markel, Macron] Trators
#3339 - #FlyMayFly# - May singing like a bird?
qmap.pub...

I think when shown proof of an attempt being ordered and evidence of crimes she decided to turn on others making a deal?

a reply to: Trillium

On it's face it seems bad that the DOJ won't have to release docs, but it could also mean a mistrial or affect the sentencing issue. I hope I didn't get out of place with other posts, but I think this is the case.

originally posted by: EndtheMadnessNow
a reply to: FlyingFox

Um, it's dated 13 Jul 2018. 🤔

That's hilarious. My Identitarian friend posted it as current news. It popped up on BBC home page as well.

Wow, they got me. No doubt London can muster some protesters to distract themselves from their own problems.

Btw, RE: military pensions


Congress appropriates money each single year for pensions based on recruitment goals and forecast retirements that year. This move takes money allocated for a few thousand troops who were forecast but never actually recruited. Every single serviceman (or -woman) still has a fully funded pension. The money in question is money that would have gone into a pension for those new recruits or into pensions for retirees had those taken place. It is money left over after fully funding everyone.

a reply to: FlyingFox

Not faulting you. It's happened to me more than once. Tricky msm

a reply to: LurkNoMore

My Trust in POTUS has gone way down...If he wanted to make a statement! He Would have told the Queen to grab her ankles and hope for the best.

Lets not forget that the Q movement is supposed to be a changing of the guard.

TRUMP is playing along... Pompeo,Kushner at.. "the meeting"

Who is Q?...Not POTUS!..prove me wrong ya deep state bitch

Maybe we'll get something on Fri. Dr. Dave Janda says he's been asked to release some information to the public

m.youtube.com...

Skip the intro -- message starts at 2:30 min mark

a reply to: LurkNoMore

I'd agree with all of that LNM but I think some of those on the list need to be extradited to US because their testimony will blow out of the water any attempt by deep state to play the facts and make them seem less guilty.

a reply to: cherokeetroy

All we're going to get is FEMA coffins..10 to a pod. I don't want to feel this way but..nothing has convinced me otherwise.

Do something Q...

If true, then this is a key moment... Tribunal Watch on twitter - @POTUS gets agreement to get custody of Assange - will he bring him back on AF1?

a reply to: Sabrechucker

If that's the case...I'd really like my own pod but until then, I'm not giving up 😁

a reply to: Sabrechucker

Some Q quotes:

This movement is larger than anyone can possibly imagine.
This movement is BIGGER than you can imagine.
Bigger than you can imagine.
You cannot possibly imagine the size of this.
This is more important than you can imagine.
These are crumbs and you cannot imagine the full and complete picture.
This is MUCH BIGGER than even AUTISTS can imagine (MUCH BIGGER!).

This is not a game.
Do not let personal (emotional) desires ("do it now""now""what is taking so long""NOW!") take over.
Logical thinking and strategy should always be applied.
Game-Theory.
WE ALL WANT TO SEE EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER THE LAW.

DJT doesn't make statements, he makes deals, Art of the Deal.

Secretary Pompeo
‏Verified account @SecPompeo

It is my pleasure to accompany President @realDonaldTrump on his state visit to the United Kingdom. As the President has said, the U.S.-UK Special Relationship is “a bond that is like no other.”
twitter.com...

UK is "Special".

Fire away.

ETA: Just found DJT said same words as Pompeo last year.
DJT remarks

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

Ya know I love ya Rel! Your incredible..But why would the average person still be interested ?

Trumps yakking it up with the Queen..the Epicenter of corruption.

Kushner..Pompeo at Bilderbirg...Trust Kansas my ass.....We've been had.

a reply to: Sabrechucker

A little confession Sabre... my mind works a lil like Bruce Willis in Armaggedon: "I have never missed a target I wanted to hit!"

I've treated this like any other strategic programme I've had accountabilities on - I'm not stopping until the programme completes successfully.

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

Where did they get that info from? Huge mega BOOM if true.

a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

I am not comfortable with the UK "accepting US"

The Deep state UK can kiss my American ass.

I understand and agree with the Q premise you laid out but....

Best of wishes...I will see Y'all on the other side

a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

Chans are trying to get more sauce on it EMN.

Anyone know how trustworthy a source Tribunal watch is?

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

Rel...Your the main reason I've read every single page!

a reply to: Sabrechucker

In the words of Meatloaf "Stop right now! Before you go any further...".

I agree this is a critical stage of evidencing the plan (UK visit+D-Day) but surely you can wait until Monday morning when we should know the output results?