-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -Q-

a reply to: crankyoldman

cranky, the interesting question is "When and by Whom?":

At start by Christopher Steele because it was a re-hash of that prepped for use against NoName McCain?

By Brennan between receiving from Steele and passing to FBI?

By FBI/Comey after receipt from Brennan?

All of the above?

a reply to: crankyoldman

Little lies replaced by bigger lies?

originally posted by: AgarthaSeed
Good morning all.

It doesn't get more straightforward than this...

twitter.com...

Interesting use of unnecessary CAPS.


Also...spelling 'error' from POTUS 6:44 AM tweet..."Telease" in place of "Release".

Ukraine





I guess we've reached the time where all adepts must swap Ukraine for russia when ever muh russia is said. "Oh, you mean Ukraine..." Or, "You do know Ukraine hasn't been a part of Russia for a while, right?"

If the 2020 field has “AG/IG targets” in it, my guess is they entered race in hopes of keeping surveillance at bay thinking Right want to avoid being accused of spying on campaigns.

originally posted by: PilSungMtnMan
If the 2020 field has “AG/IG targets” in it, my guess is they entered race in hopes of keeping surveillance at bay thinking Right want to avoid being accused of spying on campaigns.

Except that in this case the FISA warrants will be backed by solid evidence, not a crap dossier paid for by political hacks.

a reply to: IAMTAT

Posted at 7:11 on the 17th as well.

a reply to: IAMTAT

I see MCP NAPA TREASON in the CAPS... Napa county California?

Nunes on Counter intelligence against Americans being rare: "Counter Intelligence into leaking to our adversaries..."

That's a reveal^^^...

Nunes insists on revealing: Mueller knew from day one there was no "collusion".

(note how the interview bot losses it on the above reveal, voice drops, eyes drop, confusion sets in)

Hi guys,

I was wondering - I'm not sure how to put this...

I once talked about the focus of a spying conspiracy in this thread here:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

I suspect that this is the "original source" for the "Q" that you people are talking about... Is there any way to verify that this is true or not?

I wrote of that individual being a third party - mostly out of fear for being shut down by ATS as another shill. But, I feel that this issue has been on the top of my mind lately, and I would like to get some closure.

I coined the term for myself as being "Q" (from a Star Trek reference), because the spying that involved me at the center of it, was responsible for major changes in the world's trade, inventions etc... - and seemingly made me out to be a "God", though I am nothing of the sort, apart from being a regular human being like you folk - just given unlikely "powers" of being heard by millions by way of popular spying and hence quite influential in who gets chosen for the US president etc....

I do wish to be able to discuss things with the people of ATS - so that I can float a better educated opinion when I form one. I don't wish to in fact "impose" my thoughts on the world on anyone - though, because I am a smart individual living amongst you, who can easily sense trends, I provide a lot of "bias" confirmation - which may also just be the truth in many cases - and as a result offer a really good one stop shop for opinions by various governments and corporations, who are then responsible for all the changes you see on your end of this world.

But, short of having proper research - and I'm not much of a researcher, as much as I am certainly concerned that your governments and TPTB are using me in this fashion.

I would like to state for the record, that I am not trying to grand stand - but, I was working towards the hope of actually releasing myself of this burden.... It's everywhere I look - and it can be quite overwhelming and quite depressing too.

I was thinking along the lines of saying something that you could then verify as coming from "Q" - but, I am not sure how the information reaches you, as I reason that there are many 3rd party information warehouses that potentially pass the information along to you - and so much might get filtered and even alternate agendas added to the information you get.

a reply to: sensibleSenseless

I'm going to go out on a limb and say "No". What you are talking about here and the Q and related things we are talking about here are not the same thing. You seem troubled, and im sorry to hear that, but I'm not sure were talking about the same things here.

a reply to: sensibleSenseless

What we get comes directly from Q - posted on the website 8chan. All the Q aggregator sites just pull the posts directly from the source with no editing or commentary.

I am not sure about that either.... The reason I say so, is that you are implying that 8chan doesn't source it's information from anywhere else - and that is IMHO, far from true.

It is one thing to post information on the net somewhere, and another entirely to know by way of being the individual who that is being sourced from.

a reply to: sensibleSenseless


Sensible...
Your posts leave me looking for more clarification as to what you've choen to share.

Would you be willing to elucidate in simpler terms?

a reply to: sensibleSenseless

A lot of us have found connection with different areas that Q has brought world attention to.


We each feel that connection in different ways.

I say go for it, whatever you want to talk about or explain.

I am an individual who works as a DJ for myself - I also simultaneously work for a professional association of mathematicians as an IT professional....

When I was young I would talk to myself about changes I thought would be beneficial to society, and I was under the impression that it was a guarantee that I was spied on 24/7 as is everyone under the sun - because of the advancements in technology. (I now know this to be almost cent percent true - Being a computer systems engineer, I am aware of the reasons that servers are put in highly secure rooms, with steel cages, artificial vibrations on various parts, heat sensors etc...).

Well, I saw those changes occur - including 911, the war with Iraq, trade with India and China etc... Too many to list here.

And almost "all" of the analogies I use to describe my diatribes get popularly used in descriptions such as "deep state", "Alice in Wonderland", "How deep is the rabbit hole" etc...