NYT again modeling bad journalism

Another bombshell? Another set of walls closing in? Another beginning of the end?

No...

Another anonymously sourced story; this time based on triple hearsay.
THATS' RIGHT!
Why have just one source 'familiar with the matter? Now we have someone who knows someone who was told something!

NYT Says "SOME"

WASHINGTON — Some of Robert S. Mueller III’s investigators have told associates that Attorney General William P. Barr failed to adequately portray the findings of their inquiry and that they were more troubling for President Trump than Mr. Barr indicated, according to government officials and others familiar with their simmering frustrations.

I made a graphic while trying to figure this nonsense out...

The simmering frustration with coming up empty handed....oh, and Trump is still president despite their best efforts to run him out of the white house.

originally posted by: theatreboy
The simmering frustration with coming up empty handed....oh, and Trump is still president despite their best efforts to run him out of the white house.

...which any logical person could probably assume. Totally agree.
but a 'journalist' is supposed to define things, not throw out metaphors...

sigh...

Journalism is dead. When was the last time in either the USA or UK a crime was busted by investigative journalism? an honest question i do not recall. It used to be often here in the UK now all we get is agenda driven propaganda read out by smarmy TV presenters who think we watch the news to see them.

Just do what trump wants. Release the report...

a reply to: LedermanStudio

"Associates" in newspeak can mean just about anyone. From the "sales associate" selling you a laptop at Best Buy to your barista at Starbucks I suppose.

a reply to: LedermanStudio

When you dont like the news attack the source. Works all the time.

The title ... That's like saying McDonalds again modeling bad eating habits.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: LedermanStudio

When you dont like the news attack the source. Works all the time.

What source? "Some associates of some investigators"? LOL

a reply to: LedermanStudio

It's like the Twilight Zone with the way people will believe stupid little things like this as long as it's negative towards Trump. Why can't they just face the music and get on with their lives. Trump won fair and square, half of the country likes him, nobody helped us elect him and nobody changed our mind from Hillary to Trump. I get so sick of getting an article about an anonymous person whose cousin's sister's brother's friend's Uncle's step-dad's mother heard about from her stylist's friend's nephew's girlfriend's dad.

a reply to: LedermanStudio

The New York Times prestige was destroyed and they can't stand it. The same with CNN and MSNBC.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: LedermanStudio

When you dont like the news attack the source. Works all the time.

Like you attack Fox all the time? Nice projection.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: LedermanStudio

The New York Times prestige was destroyed and they can't stand it. The same with CNN and MSNBC.

Yep. They can't stand it because Trump caused it and he's the one they were lying about in an attempt to shut down.

Individuals on the Mueller team are being investigated for improper activity and potentially illegal activities. If they leaked some lies, it's sheer panic and Desperation.

Google has this buried deep in it's search results.

www.citizenfreepress.com... ls/

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: LedermanStudio

When you dont like the news attack the source. Works all the time.

You look so aggravated that make me think you are the source.....hahaha!

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: LedermanStudio

When you dont like the news attack the source. Works all the time.

What is the news?

a reply to: coldlikecustard

Remember, Brian Stetser of CNN said the other day that it is not their job to investigate, they just report. So, pretty much all they do is read a script that is provided to them - just like Ron Burgandy.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Thats the whole point. There is no source. Its second hand heresay. Absolutely ridiculous. I'm assuming that the NY Times just completely made it up, or someone told them this B.S. and they ran it as a front page headline. Their desperation and ineptness is comical.

I wish we had Carl Kolchak to investigate the news. He would find out the truth of the story and kill the monsters himself, even if no one would believe him and his editor refused to print the story. Or maybe Jim Rockford. He would get his ass kicked, not get paid, and still catch the bad guys.

Where are the real heroes anymore?

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: LedermanStudio

When you dont like the news attack the source. Works all the time.

There is no source.

There is NYT who quotes Associates of an alleged "source" who allege an "Alleged source" told them

In the legal system, we don't even call that hearsay. That is known as garbage rumor.

Wouldn't pass in a court of law, wouldn't even pass in a high school debate... and sure as # doesn't pass the BS detector.

The majority of Americans believe Mueller's findings. There are no hidden truths between the lines, unlike what you've falsely claimed. There is no 4D chess game, unlike what you've falsely claimed.

Quit lying in the name of impotent rage. It isn't becoming of you or anybody else doing it. Very transparent.

Your fantasy is over silly, and you people have absolutely no credibility with mainstream America. Your consistent and outrageous lies have finally caught up with you.