It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: RadioRobert
a reply to: projectvxn
We need to kick Turkey out of NATO. we need to close and empty Incirlik AB, and leave them to their own devices. We need to treat them as an enemy
There is so much more at stake than that. The answer(s) aren't that simple or easy, unfortunately.
originally posted by: RadioRobert
And you think all those issues will be easier to manage or disappear if we push Turkey into Russia's sphere of influence? That's cute. How exactly do you plan to effectively address those issues to your satisfaction once they are backed by an antagonistic superpower?
originally posted by: projectvxn
If it wouldn't be too much trouble I'd love to read it.
Any idea what search terms I should use?
Russia has one ally left in the Balkans. Serbia. The rest are under the US sphere, or did you miss NATO anf EU expansion?
Turkey wanted full tech transfer for the Patriots.
More bull# lol. Turkey has barely accepted any refugees back from the EU. They did happily take billions in payment though.
originally posted by: RadioRobert
.a reply to: mortex
Russia has one ally left in the Balkans. Serbia. The rest are under the US sphere, or did you miss NATO anf EU expansion?
And how do you think the EU and NATO members in the Baltic will feel about Russia in the Crimea and a hostile Turkey sitting on the Bosphorus? More or less secure?
Turkey wanted full tech transfer for the Patriots.
More bull# lol. Turkey has barely accepted any refugees back from the EU. They did happily take billions in payment though.
Your entire post is empty chest-thumping. It's a lot more complicated than the one-sided story you are presenting.
How do they feel about Russia already? What's going to change with that in regards to Turkey? Nothing.
You're trying to connect two separate things, where one doesn't affect the other. Nonsense and utter garbage.
But in your mind, it's the USA's fault for not providing Turkey everything that it wanted,
They actually did get quite a few billion from the European Union.
you are out of touch with reality.
The reality is that Turkey was never a true ally of the West.
The reality is that Turkey was a convenient relationship, because it's territory was strategically useful against the Soviet Union and for western agendas in the Middle East.
Did you forget these facts or are they just not convenient for the pro-Turkey narrative you are trying to push?
just facts. Just reality.
originally posted by: RadioRobert
So you think they hate the West and consider us enemies, but are trying to get into the EU and are NATO members for self-interest.
And you also think they would never enter a relationship of convenience with Russia or China because of historical enmity?
That's coherent...
You don't think the economic and national security of the Balkans are impacted by who sits on the Straits of Bosphorus?
No, actu, I already said a couple months ago that we should not necessarily transfer PAC-3 tech, and they absolutely cannot be a F-35 partner if they receive the S-400. That does not make Turkey's desire to strengthen their indigenous defense industries shocking or unreasonable. It is completely understandable. Most weapon sales involve some degree of technology transfer and/or industrial offsets. That's reality.
You'll have to provide a citation so I can show you where the money actually went. The EU Commission just approved some more funding yesterday. You can read where the funding goes. EU is also dragging its feet on the promised visa restrictions.
So because you are uninformed and clueless, others have to provide you with sources? Because you're either 1) incapable of using Google, or 2) lazy? Ok will do, since apparently easily verifiable facts provided to you aren't good enough, here's a source.
The EU had pledged 6 billion Euro ($7.44 billion) in funding for the refugees, and promised to mobilize the second 3 billion Euro ($3.72 billion) tranche by the end of 2018.
www.hurriyetdailynews.com...
That article, from a TURKISH newspaper, says the second tranche of 3 billion Euros, has been given to Turkey. 6 billion Euros given to Turkey.
As I was saying, that you kept denying was the case, the European Union has provided funding to Turkey for the Syrian refugees.
Want to keep arguing your invalid, clueless points? Or will you accept the facts..
Not really...
All of the above proves you're argument hasn't got any basis in reality.
Turkey will always be "strategically useful". You want to guarantee the security of the Balkan NATO members? You'll need Turkey. You want a pipeline to reduce EU dependence on Gazprom? You'll need Turkey. You want a counter-balance to Russian or Chinese influence in the ME and Black Sea? You'll need Turkey.
LMFAO again how fn clueless is this guy.
Why is Turkey needed to guarantee the security of Balkan NATO members? It makes absolutely no sense.
By the same token, whose guaranteeing Turkeys security as it borders the unstable Middle East and Iran? By your flawed logic, someone is needed to provide Turkeys security lol
Why is Turkey needed for a pipeline? For example, the undersea electricity cables that are out to tender and already funded that will link Israel to Cyprus, Cyprus to the Greek island of Crete and to the mainland, don't run through any Turkish territory.
The proposed pipelines for East Med gas from Israeli and Cypriot finds, would run a similar route, and again therefore does not run through Turkish territory.
So at what stage is Turkey needed? Oh you mean Turkeys usual game of creating a crisis to blackmail the West? The difference this time is that Turkey has gone full Islamofascist dictatorship, and has proven it is not a western ally, nor a loyal NATO member, so perhaps this time the Turks will find that the West isn't so accommodating to it's games in the region. It's already been kicked out of the F35 program, the EU has put a stop to the ridiculous negotiations to admit them, and the US is preparing sanctions. The US has even lifted the arms embargo on Cyprus. The US has given it's blessing to the Greece,Israel,Cyprus alliance that's formed in the region, as a factor of stability for the region.
Starting to get the picture? Unless Turkey dramatically reverses it's course, the Turks wont get what they want this time.
Not at all. I mentioned the Kurds specifically in my first post in the thread. Because I'm not "pro-Turkey" -- I'm even "anti-Erdogan". But I'm also "pro-reality" , and reality doesn't look like the narrative you're trying to build. Erdogan will not be the first or last bastard we've siddled up to for the sake of the bigger picture.
You've demonstrated you have no clue about the reality in the region. So what reality are you talking about?
LOL you obviously don't comprehend what it means to threaten Israel, and then buy Russian weapons ignoring warnings from the US not to go ahead with it. You also fail to comprehend what it means to be a destabilizing factor for US energy policy for Europe.
Except half your "facts" aren't true, and the other half ignore other relevant facts in order to build a picture that doesn't represent "reality"... That makes it propaganda.
On the contrary actually, what I post are facts. Of course I also post my opinion too.
But just because you don't agree with the facts, you cant claim its false or propaganda without disproving it. The fact you haven't done so, and you can't, says a lot about your motives.
I wonder whose posting propaganda and lies...it certainly isn't me...But hey man, you keep trucking on.
Honored to have been the U.S. representative at the Eastern Mediterranean Gas Forum in Egypt this past week. This forum showed that energy for peace is a reality with representatives from Egypt, Israel, Italy, Cyprus, Greece, Jordan, Palestine, France, and the EU participating.
“Whoever is on the side of Israel, let everyone know that we are against them,” Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said on Saturday, according to Iran's Press TV.
Erdogan made the comments as he addressed senior provincial officials from the ruling AKP party in Ankara.
“We do not approve of silence on the state terror that Israel blatantly carries out in Palestine,” Erdogan said.
Erdogan has a history of slamming the Jewish state and its leader, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has a history of slamming him back.
Erdogan made waves last year when he said that the spirit of Adolf Hitler had re-emerged among some Israeli policymakers.
Cyprus has delimited its EEZ (Exclusive Economic Zone) and concluded agreements with Egypt, Lebanon and Israel according to the median line principle but Turkey insists the extent of its continental shelf and shoreline overrides this principle.
As Turkey is not a signatory to the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), this excludes an application to ITLOS (International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea). As Turkey neither recognizes the Republic of Cyprus nor the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice, it has preferred a settlement based on the use of force.
In March US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo took part in the sixth trilateral summit of the alliance between Cyprus, Greece and Israel, and in a joint declaration the leaders agreed to support energy independence and security and to “defend against external malignant influences” in the Eastern Mediterranean and the broader Middle East.
Now Turkey has been excluded from the F-35 program, and the Senate’s bipartisan Eastern Mediterranean Security and Energy Partnership Act, which defines Greece as a valuable member of NATO, Israel a steadfast ally and Cyprus a key strategic partner, chalks out a new strategic alliance.
This has been confirmed by Erdogan, who in a presentation of the S-400 system stated that despite the political and military pacts Turkey has established with the West, it is from there the greatest threats come – politically, economically and culturally. Greece and Greek Cyprus have been hanging like a Sword of Damocles over their heads.
originally posted by: RadioRobert
a reply to: mortex
Alienating Turkey isn't going to solve any of the issues you list. Especially when we could alternatively simply suffer Erdogan until 2023. You think simply telling Turkey to pound sand is going to end the fifty+ yr division of Cyprus? You think it will increase the security of Israel, or Greece, or the other Balkan states?
An OTH site can't replace the TPY-2.
Incirlik is going to get reduced to a skeleton crew as soon as our Syria adventure is over. But having it there, in place, is a hell of a lot better than being asked to leave, which is what you seem to be in a hurry to force.
Even your language shows you aren't looking at this dispassionately. Pump the breaks. Take a deep breath. Get some fresh air