Moon Squatters (Short Moon Anomaly Video)

a reply to: ManyMasks

Never managed to require any decent China images (they keep their own secrets too I bet).

Also trying to open the 500mb .IMG file offered up earlier - to no avail on a mac. Any suggestions would be great. Why NASA/JPL make it so difficult sometimes almost seems intentional.

They are all under the same umbrella laughing at us getting wet.

originally posted by: OneBigMonkeyToo

This may have been done on terrestrial photographs, but it has not ever been done on lunar ones.

Some expert's whom may once have worked for NASA have been claimed to have expressed the opinion or belief that former advanced civilization existed right here on earth before our own, that they fell and so shall we, one guy even said that they had found evidence of former civilization on the moon and on mars which of course would be very different to an active presence there today if there is one and may indeed even ask did any active presence have anything to do with the demise of these former advanced society's?.

Of course Our opinion on this matter shall have to continue to be divergent.

I still like to refer back to this in spite of my very poor skill's at attempting to highlight what I interpret as an ancient tracked vehicle blown onto it's roof and into two sections (red and blue) with it's cargo of almost mummy like objects (green) spilled in the gap between the two sections, I also believe the angular stone was part of the larger formation which I do not believe is a rock and the stone is not actually a stone at all but a part of the larger object and if you were to put the 'stone' back were it belongs then turn the larger structure back into it's base and see what you shall - I see a rocket like formation then with a destroyed tracked vehicle nearby scattered in a debris field of sorts.



And of course Oh dear it's just a stone rolling down a hill now is it not.

Which despite obvious strangeness including appearing to have wheel's is just a stone eh!.


And my favourite (favourite may not be the word as I feel for this soul whomever they once were and despite a morbid fascination that gripped me it is also sad and very creepy) which most will claim is just pareidolia, the remains' of a body in a space suit that appears to be a hybrid hard soft suit with many intriguing details if you spend the time to study it.
First from the very long defunct website LunarArcheagology.org - still accessible on wayback but it's archives are now missing the image that brought it to my attention though they only focused in the helmet with the smashed visor.

Which when I checked out the original image showed me this, once again badly highlighted in red by me - the lower torso is so badly decomposed over the ages that the leg's are NOT visible at all except for some possible dust nodules that may suggest once solid mass of leg shape may have existed were they would have been, the right hand is resting under on the chest under the visor as if this being was dying and gasping for breath - the seal between the glove and the sleeve is long gone and the lower forearm bone is visible there - it look's pretty human like to me though of course it's a suit or what is left of one after ages on the moon suffering molecular decay from heat and cold, radiation and particle impacts' as well as meteor splash which as you know would like sand blasting something every time a meteor strike rained down ballistic velocity dust back onto the surface.


Also there was an astronaut whom once told of a DREAM he had 'three month's before going to the moon', in the dream he was driving the Rover when they came across some track's and followed them which led them to another rover with two other astronaut's sitting in it like they had been there forever waiting for them.
Quote
"I had this dream about John and me driving the rover up to the North Ray Crater and we came over one of the little ridges, and there's a set of tracks in front of us. It's rover tracks! Well, gosh, you know, this was all in the dream and we reported to Mission Control. We started following these tracks"
www.history.nasa.gov...

originally posted by: trippy123
Also trying to open the 500mb .IMG file offered up earlier - to no avail on a mac.

How are you trying to open it?

I have been opening IMG images for many years without a problem. I usually use NASAview, ISIS and IMG2PNG.

Why NASA/JPL make it so difficult sometimes almost seems intentional.

They do not, as you can see above they even make available to anyone the tools they use.

a reply to: ArMaP

Thank you - unfortunately I'm on 10.10 and I'll have to find an older version..or use parallels for a windows.

a reply to: trippy123

There was a date of 1958 mentioned which narrows things.
We might need a time machine but where do we find 1.21 Gigawatts to power it?
The number 3130 repeated mention of latitudes and longitudes pretty loose there.
43?

a reply to: ManyMasks

Ask and ye shall receive:

quickmap.lroc.asu.edu...

a reply to: ArMaP

I mentioned this earlier in the thread - I use nasaview for many IMG images, but Photoshop will also use them as long as you specify the image dimensions in the accompanying '.LBL' file (use 'File', 'Open As', then chose 'Photoshop RAW' as the file type). The free GIS package QGIS also opens IMG files quite happily in many cases.

This particular file, however, has an issue, as does its companion LO_3130_M file - the original tapes from which the LOIRP worked must be corrupt for these, either that or something has gone wrong with the files. I'm going to report this to the PDS today just in case it's the latter.

For the record this is the best Chandrayaan has to offer:

a reply to: LABTECH767

Posting pictures claiming to show what you think is there when you squint a bit and add some pretty colours is not the same as them actually being there. Your imaginary airbrush monkeys must have had an off day when the images were published.

There are no artificial structures on the moon other than the ones we have sent there. There are no vehicles, no alien bases, nothing but rocks and dust. Wishing they were there will not produce them. Claiming that there are there because there are no photographs of them does not prove they are there.

The videos you link there are just full of nonsense. Seriously, are we still falling back on a 'there are no stars' argument as proof of something? Badly level adjusted images of Earth does not prove that the images were faked, especially when those images of Earth are a) available in paper form when they were originally published, b) available unadjusted and untweaked for publication and c) verifiable as genuine by up to four different satellites. Many of the images you see online were scanned in the very early days of the internet and adjusted to make them look better. Some people are better at that than others. The original scans are freely available, as are the published versions in books, magazines, newspapers, as are the actual hard copies.

tothemoon.ser.asu.edu...

wms.lroc.asu.edu...

www.flickr.com...

I can't be any blunter: the people who claim they have seen NASA, or anyone else, masking evidence of aliens on the moon are either mentally ill or liars. Possibly both. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

a reply to: ArMaP

Downloaded the image (562mb) (but both showed 589.1mb) twice - installed the NASAview on Windows 8 and both times the file wont open...so...any chance you can open it and put a screen grab up please?

originally posted by: OneBigMonkeyToo
a reply to: ArMaP
This particular file, however, has an issue, as does its companion LO_3130_M file - the original tapes from which the LOIRP worked must be corrupt for these, either that or something has gone wrong with the files. I'm going to report this to the PDS today just in case it's the latter.

Call me skeptical - but isn't that just dandy?

a reply to: TheTruthRocks

Thanks, although I can only see one side and can't zoom in, I was expecting that to be like Google earth,
Maybe one day

originally posted by: LABTECH767

originally posted by: OneBigMonkeyToo

This may have been done on terrestrial photographs, but it has not ever been done on lunar ones.

Some expert's whom may once have worked for NASA have been claimed to have expressed the opinion or belief that former advanced civilization existed right here on earth before our own, that they fell and so shall we, one guy even said that they had found evidence of former civilization on the moon and on mars which of course would be very different to an active presence there today if there is one and may indeed even ask did any active presence have anything to do with the demise of these former advanced society's?.

Of course Our opinion on this matter shall have to continue to be divergent.

I still like to refer back to this in spite of my very poor skill's at attempting to highlight what I interpret as an ancient tracked vehicle blown onto it's roof and into two sections (red and blue) with it's cargo of almost mummy like objects (green) spilled in the gap between the two sections, I also believe the angular stone was part of the larger formation which I do not believe is a rock and the stone is not actually a stone at all but a part of the larger object and if you were to put the 'stone' back were it belongs then turn the larger structure back into it's base and see what you shall - I see a rocket like formation then with a destroyed tracked vehicle nearby scattered in a debris field of sorts.

And of course Oh dear it's just a stone rolling down a hill now is it not.

Which despite obvious strangeness including appearing to have wheel's is just a stone eh!.

And my favourite (favourite may not be the word as I feel for this soul whomever they once were and despite a morbid fascination that gripped me it is also sad and very creepy) which most will claim is just pareidolia, the remains' of a body in a space suit that appears to be a hybrid hard soft suit with many intriguing details if you spend the time to study it.
First from the very long defunct website LunarArcheagology.org - still accessible on wayback but it's archives are now missing the image that brought it to my attention though they only focused in the helmet with the smashed visor.

Which when I checked out the original image showed me this, once again badly highlighted in red by me - the lower torso is so badly decomposed over the ages that the leg's are NOT visible at all except for some possible dust nodules that may suggest once solid mass of leg shape may have existed were they would have been, the right hand is resting under on the chest under the visor as if this being was dying and gasping for breath - the seal between the glove and the sleeve is long gone and the lower forearm bone is visible there - it look's pretty human like to me though of course it's a suit or what is left of one after ages on the moon suffering molecular decay from heat and cold, radiation and particle impacts' as well as meteor splash which as you know would like sand blasting something every time a meteor strike rained down ballistic velocity dust back onto the surface.

Also there was an astronaut whom once told of a DREAM he had 'three month's before going to the moon', in the dream he was driving the Rover when they came across some track's and followed them which led them to another rover with two other astronaut's sitting in it like they had been there forever waiting for them.
Quote
"I had this dream about John and me driving the rover up to the North Ray Crater and we came over one of the little ridges, and there's a set of tracks in front of us. It's rover tracks! Well, gosh, you know, this was all in the dream and we reported to Mission Control. We started following these tracks"
www.history.nasa.gov...

I really dug your post. thanks for that. a lot to review btw. top notch!

originally posted by: ManyMasks
a reply to: TheTruthRocks

Thanks, although I can only see one side and can't zoom in, I was expecting that to be like Google earth,
Maybe one day

The google Moon around 2009ish was pretty darn good, but heh ...now it's very different if you catch my drift.

a reply to: LABTECH767

Some expert's whom may once have worked for NASA have been claimed to have expressed the opinion or belief that former advanced civilization existed right here on earth before our own, that they fell and so shall we, one guy even said that they had found evidence of former civilization on the moon and on mars which of course would be very different to an active presence there today if there is one and may indeed even ask did any active presence have anything to do with the demise of these former advanced society's?.

the way you say this quoted above, those same "experts" "may" have also been posting from their moms basement making those claims.

a reply to: OneBigMonkeyToo

How do you know this?
Before it was discovered that dinosaurs were a thing you would not have believed it possible if you were around, saying it's not true or that it is.... Both are as wrong as each other, anything is possible.

To be critical you must refrain from bias.

originally posted by: InhaleExhale
a reply to: LABTECH767

Some expert's whom may once have worked for NASA have been claimed to have expressed the opinion or belief that former advanced civilization existed right here on earth before our own, that they fell and so shall we, one guy even said that they had found evidence of former civilization on the moon and on mars which of course would be very different to an active presence there today if there is one and may indeed even ask did any active presence have anything to do with the demise of these former advanced society's?.

the way you say this quoted above, those same "experts" "may" have also been posting from their moms basement making those claims.

That's very true, you would be surprised how many of these experts and of course skeptic's are actually sufferers of Asperger's or more severe autism, autism especially among skeptic's as they have this need to fit reality into neat little box's.

I have worked with a few autistic's in the past, good kid's but they have complicated issues.

The old word for it was Idiot Savant, meaning fool genius as they often can not function in a world that makes no sense to them but have unique talent's in areas such as mathematics and art, to a degree perhaps the entire human race has it to a far slighter level of severity.

a reply to: OneBigMonkeyToo

No, no, no.

I do not squint a bit I squint a lot as I have only one good eye so see the world in monocular vision which was pain at time's especially when I used to work all day staring at security monitors though I tended not to make mistake's by the way just got really bad headaches.

Wink Wink.

originally posted by: LABTECH767
a reply to: OneBigMonkeyToo

No, no, no.

I do not squint a bit I squint a lot as I have only one good eye so see the world in monocular vision which was pain at time's especially when I used to work all day staring at security monitors though I tended not to make mistake's by the way just got really bad headaches.

Wink Wink.

Definitely the older you get the more you squint. Even with reading glasses on.

I had to really squint on the next anomaly - here's a hint - who'd be building swastika buildings on the Moon...Hindus?

originally posted by: OneBigMonkeyToo
I mentioned this earlier in the thread - I use nasaview for many IMG images, but Photoshop will also use them as long as you specify the image dimensions in the accompanying '.LBL' file (use 'File', 'Open As', then chose 'Photoshop RAW' as the file type).

I know, I have used Photoshop some times myself, but I prefer to use the programs made specifically to work with those images, as some versions of the IMG files are not that easy to read, as they do not have a "flat" file structure but include several channels.