The cover-up of Obama's fake birth certificate - How much did the media help - provide cover?

Look at the last 3 years and analyze what the media is, what they do, what their agenda is and how far they will go. It should be apparent that they are willing to do and say just about ANYTHING to further their cause. They will lie, slander, libel, intimidate, extort, blackmail, silence, ban, etc to get people to toe the line, stay quiet, do as they say, play by their rules etc. They seem to be a clear and present 5th column within the US and the most outrageous fact is that they are supposed to be the defenders of the Republic which is why the First Amendment was created, to allow people and the press to shine light on darkness and protect the weak from the wicked and open the eyes of the blind (well, help/make them see at least). Look how they have treated Trump and his "team" since before the election while treating Hillary like the Virgin Mary, Christ, Bhudda & Ghandi all rolled into one.

So the corruption and bias is clear as day. Now I want you to look back at ALL the issues surrounding Obama, his lack of vetting, lack of experience (junior senator from CHICAGO - the most corrupt place in the US), his association with terrorists, communists and plain old POS's. The lack of digging into the background of his wife Michael (his words, not mine), the official statements by someone that he (the person making the claim) was picked up by Obama when he was a US senator, in a Limo, where he then scored some crack coc aine for Obama, they both smoked it and then gave old Hussein Obama a BJ in the back seat of the limo. He also provided proof of receipts, phone calls, hotel stays, etc of his meeting with Obama as well as his introduction. Where was the media coverage of this? Trump had consensual sex with an "attractive" woman, and it was national news for 2+ years

Now consider all the issues with the birth certificate and EVERYTHING surrounding Obama. His obvious hatred for America, as well as Michael's. Their victim complexes that run as deep as they can possibly go. His hatred of police and siding with thugs. His lack of doing ANYTHING about immigration, especially on the S border and the MASSIVE increase in drug flow from Mexico during his term, his sending guns to the cartels and more. His racist cabinet (how can they be 90% black when only 13% of the population is black??) Where was the media coverage on that?.

Tell me ONE good thing Obama has done for the US besides leave the White House? And why does the media praise him so much?


Let's say this is hypothetically Trumps background and imagine how the media would handle it upon running for election and then being elected:

Trump's mother is an ex Amish or Mennonite woman who met and married an East German communist. Trump was born in a remote mountain community in upstate NY where his mother grew up and they don't go to hospital for child birth nor register children with the state, so no birth certificate record from the day he was born.

A birth notice was published in a small local paper 2 weeks after his supposed birth. His mother registers for a birth certificate 3 days after his birth and it states the name and date of application, and it lists the address for the "building of records" in Albany for 1949, published in the 1949 phone book. But in June of 1949 the building was cleared of occupants and demolished and the the office was relocated across town to a new building, new name, new address, new office number, etc, which was 5 months before Trump was born, so it would have been impossible for the application to have been made in person at the address listed, considering it was a barley started construction project. Now 2 years later, the "office of records" moved back to that location & address into the new building, maybe with a different office/floor number(s). It is almost impossible to find the temporary address for the office and most wouldn't even know to look for it unless you worked there at the time.

At 2 years old, his mom divorced his father & his dad moves back to E Germany to work for the Communist Gov in a high position in Ministry of Finance. At age 4 his mother remarried a foreigner from the country of Georgia, and a year later his step father moves back to Georgia and Donald & his mother follow about a year later. They lived in a fairly wealthy neighborhood where mainly government workers (communist party members - politicians, bureaucrats, etc - not street sweepers). Don also learned Georgian & Russian while living there and was partially home schooled by his mother where he was taught English.

At 10, he moved back home with his mothers parents in a strictly religious German/Russian/Prussian descended community where he studied in extremely strict & religious setting, where community and communism (maybe more socialism) were highly promoted, practiced and demanded. He did this until he went to college, an extremely prestigious & conservative religious institution (almost like studying at the American Vatican). Here he was an ardent opponent of abortion and protested the civil rights movement, women's lib and most everything else in the 60's. He was a strong supporter of continued segregation and a stronger police presence & harsher punishment to criminals. He supported longer sentences for drug possession and even capital punishment for large drug sales and wanted prison reform where all "activities" were removed to make it like a cloistered/monastery (similar to the prison in Philadelphia run by Quakers - Eastern State Prison - it's interesting check it out!

en.wikipedia.org...

Upon running for president he could not produce his birth certificate and had any "background" files from schools, medical records, etc sealed through political friends. He only produced his birth certificate towards the end of his first term, which makes it near impossible for his opponents to do proper research on it for authenticity, because the election would come too quickly. When it was produced, there were MANY mistakes found, like the address & name of "office/building of records" among other problems, as well as obvious signs the file wasn't an original and had been altered.



Now if a story like the above were true about a person running for president, wouldn't the press be all over it, especially since they are a conservative/republican? If the media couldn't dig up his background and found all kind of oddities it would be covered 24/7, like it should be. If there was reason to believe that Trump wasn't born in the US or maybe wasn't even his REAL father's son, possibly the son of the Georgian (where Stalin was from). You could make this out to be a real conspiracy, similar to the Manchurian candidate, where a fictitious is born in NY in that religious community and then later file for the birth certificate. They could even use a different child if this were a true conspiracy. Why the oddity of the "office of records" being mis-addressed and also mis-named on the official documents?

Is this where I come to learn about Benghazi?

If the birth certificate were finally produced and it was found to have layers, which does not happen with the file type provided when a document is scanned, only when it is manipulated & changed (layers allow for sections to be changed, it's like stacking clear plastic sheet with writing/info/pictures in different places to make a picture/document). A scan would produce a single layer of the final picture.


Now knowing how much manipulation has been done on the Internet (making false sites, creating false intel reports, etc) tell me that you don't think this was done for Obama when covering up his birth certificate.
[EX]https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/birth-certificate/[/EX]

Tell me ONE good thing Obama has done for the US besides leave the White House?

Now looking at what the media has done to Trump and what they have ignored with Hillary and others (Smollet among countless others), do you think they fabricated and provided cover for Obama? THAT is where the real collusion has been. I also include Facebook and Google in these lists of conspirators b/c they have the power to make documents look "older" or original, change dates, etc and there can even be manipulation of old news papers (editing or deleting) among many other things.

I would like others to look at this entire issue now with 2019 mind set (many of us had that in 2008, but were screamed at as RACISTS, BIGOTS, and were shunned, outcast and ignored). We didn't do this because he was black, we did this because the evidence said "look here, somethings VERY WRONG". But the media knew it was as well, and they had to silence those who dared speak out against "the chosen one".

Now re-think this issue w/o the perspective of race or being called racist. This topic actually still matters a lot b/c it will show what the MSM & gov are capable of, and it could make Obama's entire presidency illegitimate, it's already a utter failure, maybe that's because it was illegal to begin with. Dreamers could be kicked out b/c it came from an illegitimate squatter.

originally posted by: ErEhWoN
Is this where I come to learn about Benghazi?

Sorry I didn't get the rest of the post finished before you posted this, so there is more if you want to read the conclusion.

Cool thread and take out partisanship and the race card out and this is a real modern day conspiracy on level w JFK, 911 & gulf of Tonkin/pearl harbor, moon landings.

I am of the opinion that with today's technology it would be near impossible to fake and if there were damning credible evidence trump would be running to the supreme Court and have it plastered all over his Twitter.

Of course the media ran interference for the chosen candidate of the Intelligence Community; they always protect their own, over and above any consideration or loyalty. Nothing Obama said could be wrong, nor the results of any policy could ever be questioned.

We had 8 years of praise from on high for his every move, but ever since president Trump has taken office, it has been nothing but doom, despair, and agony on me. The difference in treatment by the media of the two presidents is readily apparent.

You might not be aware of this thread, since it was posted around a year before you joined, or maybe you do know about it from lurking or running across it prior, but MotherMayEye has an excellent thread titled, "Humor me, ATS, do you see a RAISED seal on the back of Obama’s short form birth certificate?," in which she delves into the physical birth certificate that was presented as proof of his birth.

The general gist of her thread is that the physical birth certificate is a counterfeit; similar to counterfeit currency, it looks real, but it ain't. It does not meet the requirements as stated by the State of Hawaii for what they stipulate that document should have.

Nothing will ever come of it though, just like I don't think anyone in Hillary's sphere of influence will ever be held to account for their misdeeds.

They had to be hiding something.

They used controlled opposition in almost all the birther court cases that caused Obama to never have to "prove" anything.

They supplied all the fake photos and disposable identities too 😎

The media is the arm of those who are behind the scenes who really run things. The media definitely covered it up, and they will continue to lie and whip up the dumb public with whatever their next distraction is. The media has been infiltrated with bad intelligence actors for decades and hasn't been a reporter of facts for many years now. It will continue as long as we allow it. By "we" I mean the dumb public AND those who are supposedly more awake, because as you can see from clicking on any thread here, even conspiracy theory folks have fallen for the left vs. right crap. People here eat it up like they're starving.

What I want to know is what would be the effect to legislation that was created, altered, removed, etc while Obama was president?

What would happen to any of his Supreme court appointments? I think they should all be removed if he is illegitimate, and with that being a possible effect, then they can not be party to determining any case regarding Obama's legitimacy.

Would we be able to invalidate every executive order he issued?

What about the Dreamers and DACA? Could everyone be deported because it was created by an illegal squatter?

Then there is the ACA, and all the ill's associated with it. Would the entire ACA be repealed?

What about hate speech laws, gay marriage, legalization of medical marijuana and decriminalization of it? I suspect all of these can be rolled back or at least re-voted on in some manner.

I'll say one thing, I think many people are going to look into this and other Obama& Hillary issues b/c they now know how much they have been lied to and fooled by the media for at least 10+ years. There seems to be a resurgence of people talking about Larry Sinclair online, with a lot of people wondering why the media NEVER mentioned this while they cover Stormy McMuffy 24/7, not to mention her scum bag lawyer. Tell me one person with means and power that wouldn't do EVERYTHING in their power fight someone making the false allegations of "you" being a homosexual, penis sucking, crack smoking sodomite/adulterer - when you are actually straight, monogamous, drug free with children to be concerned about (concern about how they would look at you not fighting the allegations). Any straight, drug free man who was accused of this would sue the liars a$$ off and try to get them put in jail. The problem is, Obama couldn't do any of this, because it was all true, and we can see that in his actions (mainly those mentioned in the above paragraph - gay marriage, drug legalization and lowering sentencing for coc aine and crack sales, etc)

No good can come from proving he was actually born in Kenya, because the Left would not care and simply dismiss you as being a racist if you do care.

Don't we all know how this works by now?

And just like the Mueller report, the Left will also refuse to believe it anyway.

a reply to: DigginFoTroof

This is another part of why nothing will ever come of the fact that Obama was quite possible a completely illegitimate president. All the EOs, laws, appointments, etc., etc. would have to be nullified; way too big of a fustercluck if it were actually attempted; the country would literally grind to a halt.

MME also has a lot of good posts about Sinclair and now Biden's brother (I think) helped cover up all that mess.

The whole mess of the Obama years are better just left in the past and let us try and fix everything he broke or mangled rather than completely dismantling the entire phony edifice.

Trade deals, treaties, anything Obama touched would be suspect and liable to reinterpreting in the eyes of the law, yes it is the right thing to do, but sometimes doing the right thing makes things worse not doing anything at all.

Sucks, but such is life.

a reply to: jadedANDcynical
agreed. This is something we must be pragmatic about. Even if he was born in Kenya, we can't undo the 8 yrs. he was in office.

It is far more practical to work on undoing or reversing the damage.

originally posted by: DigginFoTroof
If the birth certificate were finally produced and it was found to have layers, which does not happen with the file type provided when a document is scanned, only when it is manipulated & changed (layers allow for sections to be changed, it's like stacking clear plastic sheet with writing/info/pictures in different places to make a picture/document). A scan would produce a single layer of the final picture.


Now knowing how much manipulation has been done on the Internet (making false sites, creating false intel reports, etc) tell me that you don't think this was done for Obama when covering up his birth certificate.
[EX]https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/birth-certificate/[/EX]

Tell me ONE good thing Obama has done for the US besides leave the White House?

Now looking at what the media has done to Trump and what they have ignored with Hillary and others (Smollet among countless others), do you think they fabricated and provided cover for Obama? THAT is where the real collusion has been. I also include Facebook and Google in these lists of conspirators b/c they have the power to make documents look "older" or original, change dates, etc and there can even be manipulation of old news papers (editing or deleting) among many other things.

I would like others to look at this entire issue now with 2019 mind set (many of us had that in 2008, but were screamed at as RACISTS, BIGOTS, and were shunned, outcast and ignored). We didn't do this because he was black, we did this because the evidence said "look here, somethings VERY WRONG". But the media knew it was as well, and they had to silence those who dared speak out against "the chosen one".

Now re-think this issue w/o the perspective of race or being called racist. This topic actually still matters a lot b/c it will show what the MSM & gov are capable of, and it could make Obama's entire presidency illegitimate, it's already a utter failure, maybe that's because it was illegal to begin with. Dreamers could be kicked out b/c it came from an illegitimate squatter.

You're not gonna find it having layers unless they upload the whole project which would be in a format that most image viewers dont support and doesnt work on web pages like .psd for example for photoshop.

Every image manipulation program uses it's own type for the most part although there is limited compatibility.

The image types you often see, .gif .jpg .bmp and such do not support layers. There may be extended jpeg or bitmap or whatever that do, but standard codecs wont be able to read them.

This is very basic stuff that someone forging birth certificates wouldn't mess up on. They would likely export it merging all layers and then print it and scan the print giving it brand new metadata.

Edit: dont get me wrong I'm not defending its authenticity or anything, the evidence they have produced suggests its fake.

I'm just saying the existence of a layered image with all the stamps and signatures on separate layers wouldn't necessarily be evidence of it being faked as that could be produced after the fact for one. And if you're able to edit images like that you know enough to put it in a mainstream format and not include anything incriminating.

Maybe if it was in an old hard drive belonging to the Obama campaign that hasn't been accessed for 15 years then maybe I'd consider it.

a reply to: DigginFoTroof

Obama's fake birth certificate

Does it fkin matter?

Did you know?

There are eight former U.S. Presidents who were not born in the United States. George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, James Monroe, John Q. Adams, Andrew Jackson, and William Henry Harrison were all born prior to 1776, and therefore were born in British colonies. Martin Van Buren, the 8th President, was the first to be born in the United States. Harrison succeeded him, but every President since John Tyler (the 10th) was born in the U.S.

Source

originally posted by: toolgal462
a reply to: jadedANDcynical
agreed. This is something we must be pragmatic about. Even if he was born in Kenya, we can't undo the 8 yrs. he was in office.

It is far more practical to work on undoing or reversing the damage.

It would be a lot easier to do that work if there was unilateral support for repealing bad policies pushed by a known false potus, eh?

originally posted by: snarfbot

originally posted by: DigginFoTroof
If the birth certificate were finally produced and it was found to have layers, which does not happen with the file type provided when a document is scanned, only when it is manipulated & changed (layers allow for sections to be changed, it's like stacking clear plastic sheet with writing/info/pictures in different places to make a picture/document). A scan would produce a single layer of the final picture.


Now knowing how much manipulation has been done on the Internet (making false sites, creating false intel reports, etc) tell me that you don't think this was done for Obama when covering up his birth certificate.
[EX]https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/birth-certificate/[/EX]

Tell me ONE good thing Obama has done for the US besides leave the White House?

Now looking at what the media has done to Trump and what they have ignored with Hillary and others (Smollet among countless others), do you think they fabricated and provided cover for Obama? THAT is where the real collusion has been. I also include Facebook and Google in these lists of conspirators b/c they have the power to make documents look "older" or original, change dates, etc and there can even be manipulation of old news papers (editing or deleting) among many other things.

I would like others to look at this entire issue now with 2019 mind set (many of us had that in 2008, but were screamed at as RACISTS, BIGOTS, and were shunned, outcast and ignored). We didn't do this because he was black, we did this because the evidence said "look here, somethings VERY WRONG". But the media knew it was as well, and they had to silence those who dared speak out against "the chosen one".

Now re-think this issue w/o the perspective of race or being called racist. This topic actually still matters a lot b/c it will show what the MSM & gov are capable of, and it could make Obama's entire presidency illegitimate, it's already a utter failure, maybe that's because it was illegal to begin with. Dreamers could be kicked out b/c it came from an illegitimate squatter.

You're not gonna find it having layers unless they upload the whole project which would be in a format that most image viewers dont support and doesnt work on web pages like .psd for example for photoshop.

Every image manipulation program uses it's own type for the most part although there is limited compatibility.

The image types you often see, .gif .jpg .bmp and such do not support layers. There may be extended jpeg or bitmap or whatever that do, but standard codecs wont be able to read them.

This is very basic stuff that someone forging birth certificates wouldn't mess up on. They would likely export it merging all layers and then print it and scan the print giving it brand new metadata.

Edit: dont get me wrong I'm not defending its authenticity or anything, the evidence they have produced suggests its fake.

I'm just saying the existence of a layered image with all the stamps and signatures on separate layers wouldn't necessarily be evidence of it being faked as that could be produced after the fact for one. And if you're able to edit images like that you know enough to put it in a mainstream format and not include anything incriminating.

Maybe if it was in an old hard drive belonging to the Obama campaign that hasn't been accessed for 15 years then maybe I'd consider it.

I agree 100% about the layers, which is why I mentioned them. If you scan an image most times, for 99% of the people who want a simple file of the image, it's going to be jpg, png, bmp or possibly pdf. The file that was originally on the white house site was a file that had layers and I think it was a photoshop file, probably a psd and it was inside a viewer plugin (like a flash plugin). Someone got past the browser plugin and downloaded the source and found it had something like 30 layers, which means there could very possibly be 28-29 edits. Some could be small like erasing a smudge or writing or stamp (from customs - they bleed through sometimes), but when the person went online and told people about it, the site was changed very quickly to a pdf or jpg that didn't need a plugin, and the layers had been merged.

I remember seeing the file back when it came out and I honestly think it was a PDF with that many layers, but I don't work with creating/editing PDF's so I'm not sure how they do layers if they do them. Now if it was an OCR scan, to pick up text, and place it inside a pre-made birthcertificate background (the OCR scan of text in an outline of a blank/white birth certificate), then the OCR scan could be pasted on top of a blank birth certificate background and it would look real. And it would have at least 2 layers. There another way to do it where each section was scanned individually and pasted on the background and that would account for so many layers, and I think PDF would retain them, unless you compressed the file. I was much more into graphics and image manipulation back then and I knew 100% what I was looking at wasn't an original scan.

There was also problems with resolution/pixel differentiation between some text and the background, like they were scanned (background) and the fonts were vectored, which will show up differently and reveal a fake. But somehow, all that passed by those in power. I always wondered if they outsourced this job to the lowest bidder in China, India or Bangledesh or something. It was either that or they were rubbing our noses in it (those who could figure it out), or it was done to keep people chasing their tails.

I'll see if I can pull up the file, I know I saved it, but I lost a 4TB disk with a lot of data, but have 4 others it could be on. I'm sure the original fake is still out there somewhere, would be interesting to see if it can be found still online.

originally posted by: mekhanics
a reply to: DigginFoTroof

Obama's fake birth certificate

Does it fkin matter?

Did you know?

There are eight former U.S. Presidents who were not born in the United States. George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, James Monroe, John Q. Adams, Andrew Jackson, and William Henry Harrison were all born prior to 1776, and therefore were born in British colonies. Martin Van Buren, the 8th President, was the first to be born in the United States. Harrison succeeded him, but every President since John Tyler (the 10th) was born in the U.S.

Source

So it wouldnt matter to you that they lied right to your face?

Birthers.

The absurdity is on par with Russian collusion claims.

originally posted by: DigginFoTroof

originally posted by: snarfbot

originally posted by: DigginFoTroof
If the birth certificate were finally produced and it was found to have layers, which does not happen with the file type provided when a document is scanned, only when it is manipulated & changed (layers allow for sections to be changed, it's like stacking clear plastic sheet with writing/info/pictures in different places to make a picture/document). A scan would produce a single layer of the final picture.


Now knowing how much manipulation has been done on the Internet (making false sites, creating false intel reports, etc) tell me that you don't think this was done for Obama when covering up his birth certificate.
[EX]https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/birth-certificate/[/EX]

Tell me ONE good thing Obama has done for the US besides leave the White House?

Now looking at what the media has done to Trump and what they have ignored with Hillary and others (Smollet among countless others), do you think they fabricated and provided cover for Obama? THAT is where the real collusion has been. I also include Facebook and Google in these lists of conspirators b/c they have the power to make documents look "older" or original, change dates, etc and there can even be manipulation of old news papers (editing or deleting) among many other things.

I would like others to look at this entire issue now with 2019 mind set (many of us had that in 2008, but were screamed at as RACISTS, BIGOTS, and were shunned, outcast and ignored). We didn't do this because he was black, we did this because the evidence said "look here, somethings VERY WRONG". But the media knew it was as well, and they had to silence those who dared speak out against "the chosen one".

Now re-think this issue w/o the perspective of race or being called racist. This topic actually still matters a lot b/c it will show what the MSM & gov are capable of, and it could make Obama's entire presidency illegitimate, it's already a utter failure, maybe that's because it was illegal to begin with. Dreamers could be kicked out b/c it came from an illegitimate squatter.

You're not gonna find it having layers unless they upload the whole project which would be in a format that most image viewers dont support and doesnt work on web pages like .psd for example for photoshop.

Every image manipulation program uses it's own type for the most part although there is limited compatibility.

The image types you often see, .gif .jpg .bmp and such do not support layers. There may be extended jpeg or bitmap or whatever that do, but standard codecs wont be able to read them.

This is very basic stuff that someone forging birth certificates wouldn't mess up on. They would likely export it merging all layers and then print it and scan the print giving it brand new metadata.

Edit: dont get me wrong I'm not defending its authenticity or anything, the evidence they have produced suggests its fake.

I'm just saying the existence of a layered image with all the stamps and signatures on separate layers wouldn't necessarily be evidence of it being faked as that could be produced after the fact for one. And if you're able to edit images like that you know enough to put it in a mainstream format and not include anything incriminating.

Maybe if it was in an old hard drive belonging to the Obama campaign that hasn't been accessed for 15 years then maybe I'd consider it.

I agree 100% about the layers, which is why I mentioned them. If you scan an image most times, for 99% of the people who want a simple file of the image, it's going to be jpg, png, bmp or possibly pdf. The file that was originally on the white house site was a file that had layers and I think it was a photoshop file, probably a psd and it was inside a viewer plugin (like a flash plugin). Someone got past the browser plugin and downloaded the source and found it had something like 30 layers, which means there could very possibly be 28-29 edits. Some could be small like erasing a smudge or writing or stamp (from customs - they bleed through sometimes), but when the person went online and told people about it, the site was changed very quickly to a pdf or jpg that didn't need a plugin, and the layers had been merged.

I remember seeing the file back when it came out and I honestly think it was a PDF with that many layers, but I don't work with creating/editing PDF's so I'm not sure how they do layers if they do them. Now if it was an OCR scan, to pick up text, and place it inside a pre-made birthcertificate background (the OCR scan of text in an outline of a blank/white birth certificate), then the OCR scan could be pasted on top of a blank birth certificate background and it would look real. And it would have at least 2 layers. There another way to do it where each section was scanned individually and pasted on the background and that would account for so many layers, and I think PDF would retain them, unless you compressed the file. I was much more into graphics and image manipulation back then and I knew 100% what I was looking at wasn't an original scan.

There was also problems with resolution/pixel differentiation between some text and the background, like they were scanned (background) and the fonts were vectored, which will show up differently and reveal a fake. But somehow, all that passed by those in power. I always wondered if they outsourced this job to the lowest bidder in China, India or Bangledesh or something. It was either that or they were rubbing our noses in it (those who could figure it out), or it was done to keep people chasing their tails.

I'll see if I can pull up the file, I know I saved it, but I lost a 4TB disk with a lot of data, but have 4 others it could be on. I'm sure the original fake is still out there somewhere, would be interesting to see if it can be found still online.

Lol really I haven't heard about that one will look it up seems very stupid of them but I guess its possible.

a reply to: snarfbot

You have to look at this video at the 34 second mark. This is an image of the birth certificate that was supposedly scanned. You can obviously see the part that was scanned and it is pasted over the green textured background. It looks like the birth certificate was a copy out of book, like when you make a copy of a book and near the binding it bends up, so you get the curl and distortion..? That's what's happening on the left side of the content, where the black vertical line is and the shadowing around it.

There is no way you can get that result and the perfect background without it being at least 2 layers, the green and the text. Now I've never seen a birth certificate that doesn't have fancy designs to reduce counterfeiting. This looks like a filled out IRS tax form that is pasted over a green background.

I didn't read all the stuff, I remember making up my mind when it came out and I researched it thouroughly and concluded it was certainly not an unaltered document, not authentic but I couldn't say the information wasn't real, it could be a forgery using real information, which is HIGHLY doubtful, but maybe they were hiding something on there and the rest was legit.

go to 34 seconds


Go to 20 seconds and look at the certificate,it shows the "copying of a book" signature very nicely. That just doesn't happen on a flat paper document.

www.americanthinker.com...

www.nationalreview.com...

pjmedia.com...