It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
There are too many risks with no deal, I understand being opposed to a second referendum or revoking brexit but at the very least we need a extension to negotiate a softer exit.
Looks like a hard brexit on April 12th
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
There are too many risks with no deal, I understand being opposed to a second referendum or revoking brexit but at the very least we need a extension to negotiate a softer exit.
Looks like a hard brexit on April 12th
originally posted by: eletheia
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
There are too many risks with no deal, I understand being opposed to a second referendum or revoking brexit but at the very least we need a extension to negotiate a softer exit.
Four things that are only ever said by 'remainers'
# 1. We didn't know what we voted for we were lied to.
# 2. We need a second referendum.
# 3. No deal would be falling off a cliff
# 4. Revoke article 50 and remain
Looks like a hard brexit on April 12th
Thank god for that.
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
Forgive me as an American who probably doesn't fully understand these votes this week, but from the outside looking in it appears that your parliament somehow managed to reject a vote to exit with a deal, exit without a deal, remain, delay the exit, revote on the exit, and partially exit... literally every possible path of action was rejected INCLUDING STANDING PAT? If my understanding of things is correct, then my mind is boggled as they achieved no decision even when the option of making no decision was one of the decisions available to them.
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: uncommitted
The backstop would keep us tied to Europe and needs the approval of all EU members to be removed , May's deal also would betray our fishermen as European fleets would still have access to our waters , we're also tied into paying the EU £39 billion when its been estimated the actual bill is closer to £19 billion.
I'm sure there are other bones of contention in there but I haven't read the 39 or so pages.
The democratic will of the people is that we should leave , as a democratic organisation the EU should accept the will of the people and allow us to leave on the best terms possible , the last two years should have been spent agreeing trade deals not trying to trip us at every step.
The truth is the EU is in financial trouble and can't afford a cashcow to go astray , recession approaches the Eurozone with the troubles in Italy weighing heavy on European financiers , the term Greece 2.0 is being used.
The EU is Hotel California.
originally posted by: ManFromEurope
Everybody: "We cannot make our own decisions, we want to leave"
Nobody: *makes a decision* *makes a decision* *makes a decision*
Everybody: *surprised pikachu-meme*
UK: *market crashes, economy crashes, people are very surprised that they cannot visit EU without a visa*
EU: "Told ya."