Ghost captured on babycam?

a reply to: MichiganSwampBuck

It never fails when hard core deniers ask for proof then have some, they always try and debunk it or out right deny it's even possible.

What proof?

originally posted by: Tempter

originally posted by: KansasGirl
I am extremely suspicious, because why would they see scratches on their baby's face and immediately, or EVER, actually, jump to "It must be a ghost.". ??? What? No. That's ridiculous.

Huh?

If they're unsure and went straight to the baby cam and saw this, that's not an implausible thing to come up with.

Did you, or any of those that starred your post, read the OP????

They set up the camera AFTER THEY DISCOVERED THE BABY FACE SCRATCES.

The baby reacts. This is simply a person walking through the room. The camera is crappy anyway, which aggravates any motion blur and lighting issues.

I believe and have experienced the paranormal, but this is not it

WTH...

Why isnt anyone comenting the shadow on the ceiling??!?!?

Meanwhile, across town, a baby was captured on a paranormal team's infrared ghost cam ...
and the weirdness continues.

a reply to: Tempter

I never knew baby cams recorded video ..thats alone is suspicious to me. As for the scratches on the baby that could be a lot of things

originally posted by: Miccey
WTH...

Why isnt anyone comenting the shadow on the ceiling??!?!?

yeah I see it mate at 0.13 mark

Looks like this all may have been a setup so the parents could open a Go Fund Me, asking for $5K so they could "move out of the house"

Anyway, Kenny Biddle does a solid debunking on this:

www.csicop.org... 2p06S_E0V5z9yfN1OFZ0

a reply to: vlawde

Nice work

If it walks like a ghost, if it looks like a ghost, if it scratches like a poltergeist, .... then it must be an optical effect in the camera caused by a 1-year child frequently scratching itself.......

Stop clinging on to your worn-out materialist paradigm. It makes your desperate skepticism look ridiculous.

originally posted by: Tempter
Michigan couple claims they captured a 'ghost' on nanny cam

Yahoo Lifestyle

young couple in Michigan claims that their home is possibly haunted by a malicious ghost after their daughter appeared to have three deep “purple scratches” on her face. They also believe they have captured the poltergeist on their nanny cam.

Now, they’re ready to move out.

Heather Brough, 25, and her fiancé, Josh Higgins, 30, set up the camera after they discovered the purple scratches on their one-year-old, Lily. They believe what they captured on the camera can only be described as a ghost.

Sure looks like a ghost to me! What else could make that visage?

it could be 3 things.

1. A small bug crawling cross the nestcam, will reflect light something werid and make it seem like there something moving around or across the camera.
2. All cameras are now digital, back then when they used milimeter cameras or anology tapes. it was very hard to put CGI in it. Now with digital and some software program the average joe and some time you could easily do that was seen in the video. My guess there is actually a person walking into the room, but they just inverted the person to look trans-lucid. Seen it done before.
3. It really is a ghost or supernatural.

Deny all ignorance, ATS.

originally posted by: Tempter
Michigan couple claims they captured a 'ghost' on nanny cam

Yahoo Lifestyle

young couple in Michigan claims that their home is possibly haunted by a malicious ghost after their daughter appeared to have three deep “purple scratches” on her face. They also believe they have captured the poltergeist on their nanny cam.

Now, they’re ready to move out.

Heather Brough, 25, and her fiancé, Josh Higgins, 30, set up the camera after they discovered the purple scratches on their one-year-old, Lily. They believe what they captured on the camera can only be described as a ghost.

Sure looks like a ghost to me! What else could make that visage?

it could be 3 things.

1. A small bug crawling cross the nestcam, will reflect light something werid and make it seem like there something moving around or across the camera.
2. All cameras are now digital, back then when they used milimeter cameras or anology tapes. it was very hard to put CGI in it. Now with digital and some software program the average joe and some time you could easily do that was seen in the video. My guess there is actually a person walking into the room, but they just inverted the person to look trans-lucid. Seen it done before.
3. It really is a ghost or supernatural.

Deny all ignorance, ATS.

Another easily debunked video with the family looking to profit off it. Its always money and fame.