It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: DigginFoTroof
Dealing with big issues I see.
originally posted by: DigginFoTroof
I was looking through a local flyer and came across a business that had a picture of the proprietor and it was a picture of a woman but the business name was from the original gender of the business owner - let's just call it "Dave's auto body". Now because of state laws (IDK if his is nation wide or not), you don't need to create a DBA (Doing business as) or create a "fictitious name" if you include your name in the name of the business. So if "David/Dave Jones" were to create a business they could call it "Dave's XXX" or "Smith's XXX" or some combination of this. The reason you don't need to register is a few reasons, but one is that it is easier to find the proprietor of the business when it includes the owners name - when it is something like "Better Way Auto Body", there is no indication who the owner is.
Now I've seen the picture of the business owner for years and it's clear this new picture is the same person with a perm and the beard/go-tee shaved - it's really creepy. The thing is now the owner's name is "Danielle Smith" or something but the business name is still "Dave's auto body". So I see a few problems with this. The most obvious is the protection of the public who think they are looking for "Dave" as the proprietor for either business transactions or for legal reasons. Second is laws against "dead naming". In the most ridiculous cases people have law suits filed against them for using the person's "pre-op" name and in this case, it would be done every time someone calls, and all previous customers would call looking for "Dave".
Talk about a ridiculous problem to have to discuss but I'm guessing that states are trying to dismiss this issue as long as possible but it's going to end up
in the courts, and IMO the proprietor is guilty of fraud for every day they operate the business under the previous name once they have a legal name change.
originally posted by: DigginFoTroof
I was looking through a local flyer and came across a business that had a picture of the proprietor and it was a picture of a woman but the business name was from the original gender of the business owner - let's just call it "Dave's auto body". Now because of state laws (IDK if his is nation wide or not), you don't need to create a DBA (Doing business as) or create a "fictitious name" if you include your name in the name of the business. So if "David/Dave Jones" were to create a business they could call it "Dave's XXX" or "Smith's XXX" or some combination of this. The reason you don't need to register is a few reasons, but one is that it is easier to find the proprietor of the business when it includes the owners name - when it is something like "Better Way Auto Body", there is no indication who the owner is.
Now I've seen the picture of the business owner for years and it's clear this new picture is the same person with a perm and the beard/go-tee shaved - it's really creepy. The thing is now the owner's name is "Danielle Smith" or something but the business name is still "Dave's auto body". So I see a few problems with this. The most obvious is the protection of the public who think they are looking for "Dave" as the proprietor for either business transactions or for legal reasons. Second is laws against "dead naming". In the most ridiculous cases people have law suits filed against them for using the person's "pre-op" name and in this case, it would be done every time someone calls, and all previous customers would call looking for "Dave".
Talk about a ridiculous problem to have to discuss but I'm guessing that states are trying to dismiss this issue as long as possible but it's going to end up
in the courts, and IMO the proprietor is guilty of fraud for every day they operate the business under the previous name once they have a legal name change.
originally posted by: DigginFoTroof
originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: DigginFoTroof
Dealing with big issues I see.
Wow, thanks for the insight. It's never an issue when a liberal is breaking the law, but if a conservative were to be doing the same thing, there would be protesters outside trying to shut the business down and villainizing them at every chance.
If you CAN'T add anything of value then scurry back to your bridge and wait for the children you can accost.
originally posted by: DigginFoTroof
a reply to: Malisa
Yes, I'd feel the same way if they changed their name to "mike". As for your "opinion" that mine is worthless, what ever happened to allowing people to think what they want - so much for the tolerant left - yet again! Now head to your safe space, stomp your feet, ball your fists up, look up to the sky and let out a good scream and maybe you'll feel better and you'll have really gotten your point across! Well done, good work and keep it up!
originally posted by: DigginFoTroof
a reply to: Malisa
Yes, I'd feel the same way if they changed their name to "mike". As for your "opinion" that mine is worthless, what ever happened to allowing people to think what they want - so much for the tolerant left - yet again! Now head to your safe space, stomp your feet, ball your fists up, look up to the sky and let out a good scream and maybe you'll feel better and you'll have really gotten your point across! Well done, good work and keep it up!