Lie Detector Test for 3

originally posted by: thedigirati
a reply to: UncleTomahawk

Great, So I'm sure it won't take you long to find it, you made the claim you back it up.

Good luck with that.

originally posted by: UncleTomahawk

originally posted by: thedigirati
a reply to: UncleTomahawk

Great, So I'm sure it won't take you long to find it, you made the claim you back it up.

No i did not make the claim the police and fox news radio did.

Perhaps you are just taking the piss so you can ignore the evidence and the fact the brothers were never subjected to any scrutiny over their claims.

Provide the evidence.

a reply to: UncleTomahawk

Or you flat out lied. That is the truth.

originally posted by: thedigirati
a reply to: UncleTomahawk

Or you flat out lied. That is the truth.

Now you are not calling me a liar but others in this thread that have reported to having knowledge that the brother struck jussie.

Read this thread.

So, for the zillionth time since this story came out, let's look at the facts that WE know logically.

1. Why would 2 black men, well known to the "victim" attack another black man, pretending to be white by your reckoning?
2. Why didn't Smollett recognise their voices etc?
3. How on earth did the brothers know where he'd be at 2am?
4. As all 3 people knew each other and had in fact worked together, what possible motive did the brothers have to attack
smollett? And in disguise allegedly too?
5. What about the "rehearsal" for the attack the day before?
6. Smollett alleged he had bleach poured on him....where were the bleach marks on his hair clothes etc that stuff is lethal
7. Other than a scratch below his eye he had no injuries and yet he stated he was hit and he fought back even though he
was holding a sandwich and his phone at the time
8. Why did he refuse to hand over his phone & records?
9. What possible reason could the Police have for making this all up?
10. Why did he wait 45mins before reporting this "crime"?

a reply to: Muninn

You have to take my word for it.

All the proof you need is that the two claimed they were paid to strike jussie.

If you believe that lie then you should not have any problem believing they struck jussie.

Paid or not paid it is a fact that they struck jussie.

That is why they should all three undergo a lie detector by the fbi.

a reply to: UncleTomahawk

Cite a source other than Jussie, that says the brothers struck Jussie. not "something I heard on the radio"

originally posted by: UncleTomahawk
a reply to: Muninn

You have to take my word for it.


Paid or not paid it is a fact that they struck jussie.

Cite your souce for these "Facts"

you are incorrect!

It should tell you all alot that the people who belive the brothers can not follow the logic they are putting down.


They claim jussie paid them to beat him up.

Then they claim the two did not beat him up.

They claim all three believed the act happened under a camera.

Does not compute!

a reply to: UncleTomahawk

so you have no source, as I said you LIE!!!

The entire episode was scripted and acted out.

Even Smollett's lies.

😀

Jusse was in fact "struck" but the "strikes" were Hollywood acting "Strikes".

Jusse had some Hollywood style self-inflicted "Strike" marks to make it all look real.

All part of the poorly written script that will soon implicate some politicians 😎

originally posted by: PhyllidaDavenport
So, for the zillionth time since this story came out, let's look at the facts that WE know logically.

1. Why would 2 black men, well known to the "victim" attack another black man, pretending to be white by your reckoning?
2. Why didn't Smollett recognise their voices etc?
3. How on earth did the brothers know where he'd be at 2am?
4. As all 3 people knew each other and had in fact worked together, what possible motive did the brothers have to attack
smollett? And in disguise allegedly too?
5. What about the "rehearsal" for the attack the day before?
6. Smollett alleged he had bleach poured on him....where were the bleach marks on his hair clothes etc that stuff is lethal
7. Other than a scratch below his eye he had no injuries and yet he stated he was hit and he fought back even though he
was holding a sandwich and his phone at the time
8. Why did he refuse to hand over his phone & records?
9. What possible reason could the Police have for making this all up?
10. Why did he wait 45mins before reporting this "crime"?

1. Any reason would be as good as them claiming jussie was trying to get a raise.
2.Only one of them spoke and was yelling racial stuff and possibly throwing his voice.
3.Jussie like many other famous folks posted his activities frequently on the internet. To do so was normal for him.
4. Maybe he pissed them off and they wanted to "rattle his cage" without getting caught. Maybe they had an unknown grudge?
5.I know nothing about a rehearsal the day before but that claim could have been born out of any meeting between them. Most likely it was in regards to strength training and the nutritional program jussie was paying the brothers for.
6. The bleach claim has been verified by the police as far as i know.
7. The police have said that the brothers did indeed strike jussie.
8.Privacy...Perhaps he did not want the police to have all his text messages showing his drug deals. He has admitted to addiction and buying molly from the brothers for a long time. Maybe he had pictures or video of famous people doing naughty things.
9.The police did not want riots so they had much reason to diffuse the situation. Maybe the brothers were known to police and had helped them in the past.
10.I have no idea other than adrenaline. Either way that is beside the point cause in both paid and not paid scenarios both required police to be involved. Perhaps he was not even going to report the incident but someone on the phone convinced him to do so? Perhaps he had reservations about giving a couple haters the attention they seemed to want.

originally posted by: UncleTomahawk
a reply to: Muninn

You have to take my word for it.

All the proof you need is that the two claimed they were paid to strike jussie.

If you believe that lie then you should not have any problem believing they struck jussie.

Paid or not paid it is a fact that they struck jussie.

That is why they should all three undergo a lie detector by the fbi.

Sorry bro, your word means nothing.

originally posted by: xuenchen
The entire episode was scripted and acted out.

Even Smollett's lies.

😀

Then he would likely refuse a lie test done by the fbi.

a reply to: UncleTomahawk

You automatically assume his story is true? Yet pointing to the ridiculous story and piling evidence to the contrary is just assumed false? You demand evidence on one side and reject it when it's presented, while at the same time you just accept the other side without question because news reports said so or whatever.

It's ridiculous. Let it go.



ETA: What user name will you go under after the majority of your work here on ATS is proven to be completely false?

originally posted by: Muninn

originally posted by: UncleTomahawk
a reply to: Muninn

You have to take my word for it.

All the proof you need is that the two claimed they were paid to strike jussie.

If you believe that lie then you should not have any problem believing they struck jussie.

Paid or not paid it is a fact that they struck jussie.

That is why they should all three undergo a lie detector by the fbi.

Sorry bro, your word means nothing.

Then why are you here?

Others have verified what i am saying in regards to the attack.

This shows clearly that you are not using logic.

Either the attack happened under a camera or it did not.

Think about it and stop being contrary for the sake of just disagreeing with me.

a reply to: UncleTomahawk

All the evidence against him is circumstantial and if it was not it would not have taken a grand jury to indict him.

Except that’s sort of what grand juries do. It’s like...pretty much all they do.

In Cook County, when one is being sought for a felony you get either a preliminary hearing which takes place after arrest or a grand jury indictment which takes place before arrest.

Your understanding of the legal process is pretty flawed at a very basic level, which makes having any sort of thoughtful and meaningful discussion an exercise in futility.

originally posted by: sine.nomine
a reply to: UncleTomahawk

You automatically assume his story is true? Yet pointing to the ridiculous story and piling evidence to the contrary is just assumed false? You demand evidence on one side and reject it when it's presented, while at the same time you just accept the other side without question because news reports said so or whatever.

It's ridiculous. Let it go.

ETA: What user name will you go under after the majority of your work here on ATS is proven to be completely false?

That is the process when affording someone their rights givin to us by the constitution and every man and woman that have died to protect those rights.

Clearly you have nothing to add if you attempt to make this about myself or some other member from your past who has hurt you in some way. This is the 5th time someone has brought up this issue in order to deflect from a topic. I would like to meet this mysterious member who has hurt all so much.

Deflection denied!

a reply to: Shamrock6

Except that’s sort of what grand juries do.

Sort of!

Nice deflection attempt.

If they had proper evidence they could have been indicted without summoning a grand jury.

The majority of cases in cook county end in a plea.

I am sure you knew that though.