-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -sIxteen-

a reply to: Skada

That has nothing to do with the excuse that Q team needed anons to connect the dots publicly, that is the shift from "anons need to dig so that the info can be used to prosecute" to "it is about bringing awareness".

Q team could have done the dot connecting anonymously. That has been my point all along.

Also, these connected names don't really mean anything to me. It is just like saying "Trump knew Epstein", what does that prove? Nothing. That cuts both ways.

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: Skada

...Q team could have done the dot connecting anonymously. That has been my point all along.

They already have. (They have it all, carnivore, prism, the "sniffers" that Q mentioned in Q#3258.)

In one instance, they had anons dig on RayChan's posts, this Q refs that.

In Q#1066
Connection made.
RC end.
We have grounds.
Reverting.
Thank you.
Q

It was stated by 'Q' that there was really bad stuff that would be hard for us to understand in regards to this operation. There are people (political, hollyweird, rich, famous) that have raped, murdered, etc (allegedly). If they said that your most favorite actor tortured and killed a baby to drink their blood (allegedly), then showed the video pict reference, how would you feel. I for one would throw up.

a reply to: Skada

You might be suffering from thread amnesia but you just linked the post where you said:

We, the people, make the connections, report our findings (public source), and then the evidence can be legally allowed in a court of law.

I'm not talking about connections signed Q, I specifically said that Q could have made all the connections you were referring to in the above quote in a few months after Trump took office, while posing as anons.

Then they could have proceeded to prosecute at a speed that the public could tolerate. That is what makes the above claim flimsy to me.

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

That passage from the movie was sobering.

Backing everything up near impossible but someone somewhere should publish a book.

Sobering again when you see Trump signing an EO to look into preparedness against an emp attack.

a reply to: daskakik

It is possible that some of Team Q may be doing just that to push along a few anons to "Bake moar".
In fact a few anons suggested just that, I don't have the references or links, so take it or leave it.

You really have mastered "the game" that you love to play so much, playing devil's advocate, always posting the negative. Even you are helping us gain exposure, so if you are a paid shill, you need to give that money back, because you are producing the Streisand effect.

I edited some of my posts for clarity, so please go re-read them.

Good luck Dash.

originally posted by: PokeyJoe

Remember when their entire system went down, and they blamed it on a fire suppression system? One part of the data center goes down, and the entire system crashes? Did Wells Fargo actually get hacked or messed with in some other way? Now, mysteriously maybe a month later, the CEO and CISO are both gone?

Thanks for pointing that out. Maybe lots of money was "lost" during the event, and hasn't been found/recovered since.

a reply to: carewemust

Full disclosure I work for Wells Fargo and people around here have been dropping like flies lately. IDK why, no one ever gives a reason but 3 people on my team have quit for new jobs elsewhere in the last 2 weeks, on top of all the executive movement in the company. I hope nothing really bad is about to hit the company, I dont want to look for a new job.

a reply to: Skada

Doing just that? They could have done it 2 years ago and had real results by now. Instead we have people saying "It is possible...".

I'm not here to hide anything, so it can't be a Streisand effect.

a reply to: daskakik

Having Q just drop everything they know as soon as the operation started would sort of defeat the entire purpose of the whole thing, wouldnt it? Hard to have a Great Awakening if you are spoonfed all the information you need at the very beginning.

originally posted by: PokeyJoe
Having Q just drop everything they know as soon as the operation started would sort of defeat the entire purpose of the whole thing, wouldnt it?

Not if the purpose was:

We, the people, make the connections, report our findings (public source), and then the evidence can be legally allowed in a court of law.

All I'm saying is that that wasn't the purpose, as that post alluded to.

Hard to have a Great Awakening if you are spoonfed all the information you need at the very beginning.

Actually, what difference would it make if someone from Q team connected the dots or some other faceless person on the web does it?

a reply to: daskakik

If you dont honestly see the difference there, then I dont know what else to say to you.

a reply to: PokeyJoe

There is no difference to the reader if the user name says "anon" in both cases.

How would you know if the person on the other end is part of Q team or not?

originally posted by: PokeyJoe
Remember when their entire system went down, and they blamed it on a fire suppression system? One part of the data center goes down, and the entire system crashes? Did Wells Fargo actually get hacked or messed with in some other way? Now, mysteriously maybe a month later, the CEO and CISO are both gone?

originally posted by: carewemust
Thanks for pointing that out. Maybe lots of money was "lost" during the event, and hasn't been found/recovered since.

Perhaps some of the "coincidental" catastrophes that hit companies are actually "fines" levied by the government(s) ?

Think maybe it's faster and more effective than a "court" action 😎

a reply to: XAnarchistX

if this was actually about finding out the truth,

If this is what they wanted they would all as a group be trying to find out who q really is.

a reply to: scraedtosleep

Ummm, no. Personally I am intrigued who Q actually is, but it doesnt really matter at all in the grand scheme of things. We dont know who Q is now, yet here we are. When Q wants to make their identity public, we will know, until then who cares?

Anybody know of keeping Electronics in an unplugged microwave would protect from an EMP?

a reply to: dashen

I think it might help in an actual, real, enemy, air burst EMP situation as much as a tin foil hat helps stop the government from reading your mind.

a reply to: PokeyJoe

:Cough: Rick Perry :cough cough:

a reply to: PokeyJoe

If q was ds it wouldn't mater to you?

originally posted by: wanderingconfusion
a reply to: MindBodySpiritComplex

Interesting MBSC.

Do you think he is part of the bloodlines families? Knights of Malta leads back to the Templars and Godfrey de Boullion.

If you really want to start at the beginning, research the Brotherhood of the Snake. This link will get you started -

www.bibliotecapleyades.net...