-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -sIxteen-

He's going down the Epstein road, and its going to be ugly

a reply to: Bill1960

DS (American?) politics at work. Thats nothing. They (Muslims) already do that here, in the US, up in...think its Dearborn, MI. Heard they took over the city. Probably didn't take much to trigger a young naive guy [former candidate for mind cracking] diluted by the wrong set of folks.

IDK, we live in crazy times.

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

Can't get the page to load any drops...just blankness
EDIT never mind it seems it takes some time to load..ignore me I'm senile

New Q drops are up. Q on fire again...

Q3133

Started digging on the pic Q posted, trying to figure out who took the pic.

Doing a search of it on Tineye, the first article that pops up is from True Pundit, last March.

One thing that popped out, going to dig further in a bit, was the location the pic was taken:

“Clinton is seen here kicking back at a beach day in Jan. 2017 in Palmilla, Bayahibe, an exclusive haven of warm waters and refuge, near the so-called Paso de Catuano, very close to Isla Saona. This resort is only in accessible by private boat.”

No idea who took the pic yet, still digging, but thought I’d share the location in case it helps one of you.

Anybody know anything about this “resort” ?? Is it a “Last Resort” ?

Sauce: truepundit.com...📁

>>5800566
www.rachelchandler.us...📁
How many 'girls' were waiting for their return to the boat?
Who owned the boat?
What does a 'handler' procure?
Is the 'handler' [one of many] connected to Epstein?
Flight logs reveal many hidden artifacts.
[RC]
Q

Q3134

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 9ba2be No.5801012 📁
Mar 20 2019 22:31:52 (EST)

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 9ba2be No.5800988 📁
Mar 20 2019 22:30:24 (EST)
>>5800566
www.rachelchandler.us...📁
How many 'girls' were waiting for their return to the boat?
Who owned the boat?
What does a 'handler' procure?
Is the 'handler' [one of many] connected to Epstein?
Flight logs reveal many hidden artifacts.
[RC]
Q

>>5800988
WHO IS RACHEL CHANDLER?
Q

Q3135

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 9ba2be No.5801092 📁
Mar 20 2019 22:35:20 (EST)

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 9ba2be No.5801012 📁
Mar 20 2019 22:31:52 (EST)
>>5800988
WHO IS RACHEL CHANDLER?
Q

>>5801012
WHAT HIGH-PROFILE 'ELITE' PEOPLE FUND AND PROVIDE RACHEL W/ HER PHOTOGRAPHY STUDIO?
WHAT IS THE STUDIO USED FOR?
WHAT IS THE STUDIO REALLY USED FOR?
WHO HAS RC BEEN PICTURED WITH?
THIS GOES FAR BEYOND SPIRIT COOKING MODELS.
Q

Q3136


Q3137

a reply to: IAMTAT

Those who yell the loudest...

originally posted by: carewemust
This is an interesting statement about John McCain from President Trump at today's Ohio rally.

mobile.twitter.com...

Yeah. I just watched that speech, in its entirety...mostly because I am a retired union guy...who often butted heads with my local...and it is my neck of the woods. Very much a barn-storming kind of support event.

This is the first President, in my lifetime, that takes the time and effort to reward people for their dedication, and for keeping their heads in the game.

originally posted by: crankyoldman

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: crankyoldman

I'm sure Barack Obama and Valerie Jarrett had no idea that 7 of the Admin's top Intel and Law Enforcement officials were conspiring with each other, to help Hillary/hurt Trump.

According to Lisa Page, Obama wanted to be kept in the loop on everything

"Highest Levels."

He was. All we have to do is see Loretta Lynch's communications. She played stupid in her Dec 2018 deposition. "Extreme amnesia", is how one Congressman described it.

How do you get to the truth if a "witness" can't remember anything, and didn't use e-mail/text msgs? I don't think Lynch was stupid enough to e-mail and/or text Valerie Jarrett. (In Chicago politics, Obama issued orders via Valerie) Maybe Jarrett should be called in to testify.

Q3138

Re Q Post qntmpkts.keybase.pub...:


This is a 1 min MARKER coming 01:28 after #3133 - meaning IMMINENT ACTION

Also, the www.rachelchandler.us has a link to rachelchandler.tumblr.com... which is a text free page of photos, of which about half are children.

Jesus, seems like it's a dating service for butt-ugly men.

twitter.com...

Hmmm.
Getting out of dodge?

a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

What is Q trying to tell us by recycling back through this Epstein/Pedo stuff again?

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

What is Q trying to tell us by recycling back through this Epstein/Pedo stuff again?

Maybe arrests are finally going to happen.

Q3139


Q3140

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: f36d89 No.5801380 📁
Mar 20 2019 22:48:08 (EST)
>>5801072
Epstein island dungeon (beneath the temple).
Sex & torture rooms.
Openly flaunt across social media?
Untouchable?
Q

Q3141

Q3142


Q3143

I would like to point out that Robert Kraft is getting a plea deal (maybe in exchange for info) I hope

You all know I am fully on board, Q is real and trying to save humanity. I think the reality that is lost at times is that... they're fighting back. Personally, I am vindicated by the knowledge that all my/your assumptions/suspicions we're correct, It really is that bad. Are we winning??? people have had a lot of fun with Q (I myself a big culprit) If this is the fight for our lives, it should be taken MUCH more serious from here on out. Tonight's Q drops mean one of two things.. 1,They have to re-hash because we lost our way... or it's about to "happen" I hope for the latter but, either way it's time to lace up! Joke or a game?

originally posted by: 1point92AU

originally posted by: ucanthandlethetruth

When Reddit famously banned The Great Awakening Q sub I realized the proverbial "they" were legitimately concerned by the Q movement. Google, Facebook, Reddit, and Twitter which are the corner stones of social media have all shown who really controls them.

The irony is the more "they" attempt to control the flow of information the more people become red pilled. I look forward to more of your posts.

Completely agree.
I'm struggling to get up to speed on this platform. Lurking was MUCH easier.

At first Q was interesting, entertaining, then a bit perplexing, but I do also feel I became more alert about Q and more motivated to dig and dig due to the actions of MM and social media platforms. I'm still fairly young, I guess, but I've never witnessed such a "don't look here - it's ghastly, terrible, lunatic tin-foil hat-wearing morons following a kid from his mom's basement" common theme blasted to the masses. My immediate thought was, well if all of your hundreds of articles are true, why do you care enough to keep writing them? You certainly aren't writing repeated and consistent articles about flat earthers, etc. Whomever is giving them psych advice on pumping out these articles is the moron. It seems to backfire in their faces, yet I'm not sure I've seen a good number depicting how many across the globe are tuning into Q now.

Q3144



Q3145

There's nowhere to hide you f#ckin scumbags, we got your number. Nuff' said