It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: mirageman
The Las Vegas I-Team has issued nothing but positive, supportive reports on the TTSA operation since its inception. Here are just some of the Las Vegas Now I-Team articles which are all 100% positive and unquestioning about the operation of TTSA. In fact these go back well over a year prior to the company launch.
This is not journalism it is propaganda!
I-Team: Rocker turns UFO expert – 05/06/2016
I-Team: Tom Delonge looks to lift veil of UFO secrecy – 05/06/2016
I-Team: Rock star plans for announcement on UFOs – 05/23/2017
I-Team: Public company launched to investigate UFOs – 10/11/2017
I-Team: DeLonge to unveil plans for cutting edge science to investigate UFOs – 10/11/2017
Former Pentagon UFO official: ‘We may not be alone’ – 12/18/2017
The Pentagon’s secret UFO program – 12/18/2017
I-Team Exclusive: Sen. Reid discusses UFO study – 12/19/2017
I-Team: UFO study focused on U.S. military encounters – 12/20/2017
I-Team Exclusive: Sen. Reid discusses UFO study – 12/21/2017
I-Team: Pentagon UFO study catches attention of Congress – 12/21/2017
I-Team: Secret UFO program recorded encounters with unknown objects – 02/01/2018
I-Team: Man who headed up secret government UFO study speaks out – 02/01/2018
I-Team: Man who headed up secret government UFO study speaks out – 02/02/2018
I-Team: Secret UFO program recorded encounters with unknown objects – 02/06/2018
I-Team: Understanding the science of UFOs – 02/07/2018
I-Team: Mystery metal studied in Las Vegas – 02/20/2018
I-Team: Documents prove secret UFO study based in Nevada – 05/04/2018
TTSA have chosen George Knapp as their sole media outlet for longform interviews. He seems happy to deliver softball questions for this exclusivity. By early summer 2018 this even included George attacking anyone who doubts his and their motives. All very out of character for a guy who has built up a sturdy reputation since the late 1980s. George is of course an award winning journalist with a long history in the UFO field. However his judgement seems clouded here. He has left himself in a position where he appears biased towards TTSA by presenting everything as being positive and well handled. When we know he surely can’t be that dumb or he wouldn’t be an award winning journalist.
Former Sen. Harry Reid: "This has been going on a long time. These sightings are said to have been set off by a rocket in California or something. People do not want, who are in positions of responsibility, whether it's the Pentagon or whatever it might be, they don't want to have to try and explain something that many times is not explainable."
The fact is that UAP ARE violating US airspace. I have personally witnessed it. I don't say that to convince anyone, I say it because I know it. The rest of your post is character assassination. Congrats on understanding umbrella or parent companies and the associated methodologies in corporate organization but unless you are privy to internal secrets and documents, you are way off base. The sheer length that you go to, to attack their organization is absurd. You basically just make assumptions and then cherry pick facts that support your supposition.
The REAL QUESTION isn't if they are here, it is WHY are they here.
I cant blame you totally. I was skeptical for 25 years myself so i do understand but August 2015 changed everything for me.
The fact is that UAP ARE violating US airspace. I have personally witnessed it. I don't say that to convince anyone, I say it because I know it. The rest of your post is character assassination. Congrats on understanding umbrella or parent companies and the associated methodologies in corporate organization but unless you are privy to internal secrets and documents, you are way off base. The sheer length that you go to, to attack their organization is absurd. You basically just make assumptions and then cherry pick facts that support your supposition.