Beyond Bigelow & BAASS, After AATIP and on To the Stars...

a reply to: celltypespecific

You have also mentioned it on your new thread. Good luck with that one, eyes rolling again.

a reply to: Baablacksheep

Hi Baablack,
What does that mean... ?

Is this old info if it is then I will delete those post....

I was just trying to be helpful...maybe there are new lurkers on this thread that have never heard of this organization.

Please clarify if you can. Thanks.
Interesting technical report :

Unidentified Aerial Phenomena-Eighty Years of Pilot Sightings

Military and Aviation Personnel Technical Reports:

Military and Aviation Personnel Technical Reports

a reply to: celltypespecific


You post what you wish Cellty no need to delete anything, I just noted your new post .

Isnt this exactly how that 2007 TheFinalTheory thread started?

"Anybody else see anything strange while serving in the military? I'll show you mine if you show me yours."

originally posted by: celltypespecific
Not sure what the cards are being played:

That guy completely disqualified himself by his reply to the metabunk analysis:

“I am getting some of the other background information that 'debunks' West's silly reply. First bit of information... the speed of the object was 300-400 knots (about 350 to 460 miles per hour). As measured by radar.. So goddess help that "bird" should it ever hit the water at such a speed! The wind drag alone would rip off it's feathers! LOL."

Except that the camera data shows no such high speeds.

Nonetheless I am still waiting for him to present that background information.

No ice cream for me or the metabunk guys I guess. LMAO.

a reply to: mirageman

Nolan has mentioned on an interview not that long ago, that the main bulk of research regarding his work on the Caudate Putamen and experiencer group was complete. The next stage was getting the research through peer review, maybe hes referring to people being too impatient until that process is complete?

Not sticking up for the guy obviously, he can do that himself. Just wondering if we are jumping the gun here or not...
#TitsUpTuesday...

originally posted by: pigsy2400
a reply to: mirageman

I thought it was "Strawberry Ice-cream 🍦"

originally posted by: pigsy2400
well it even looks like Kit has got some coverage in "The Sun" newspaper in the UK too with the headline;

ALIEN RIDDLE 
CIA scientist thought fake Roswell alien autopsy video was real, bizarre leaked memo claims
EXCLUSIVE


The Sun Article

A new Ben & Jerry's perhaps: Strawberry Ice-Meme.

Hilarious and fitting that Kit made The Sun and the story is apparently true. No matter from which angle you look at it---it's not a good look to be wearing.

Was Kit Green sowing disinfo amongst his friends in either an official or unofficial disinfo job? Is he studying his own friends and associates like they were lab rats? Did he think it made him the cool kid? Was he having a schizophrenic break with reality?

originally posted by: [post=24460393]mirageman[/post

A slideshow of your greatest hits would be a hoot and arguably a public service, MM. Maybe set to Thus Spake Zarathrusta.

a reply to: The GUT

You're right!

a reply to: celltypespecific

Sure, go right ahead.

a reply to: Jukiodone

Maybe it was the worlds very first instance of Dead Chewbacca... With bells on...

a reply to: beetee

Ok thanks. I will tweet him now.

a reply to: celltypespecific

Great idea, cellty! I don't think a better question could be asked in response. I wonder if Nolan will answer or show great confidence by ignoring it?

Exquisitely well-framed and to the point, beetee. Bravo,Sir.

Let's suppose Dr. Nolan had proposed a new theory to the scientific community, and it was rather astounding. But the problem was that he wouldn't share his test results with the rest of the world. When people then demanded to see the basis on which his new theory was built, he would refer to them as "children, clamouring for ice cream".

originally posted by: The GUT
a reply to: Arbitrageur

Dorothy: Multiple cameras, cameras checked for defects and multiple lights way OVER the skyline in her films with no space needle in sight.

None of Dorothy's claims trump the obvious nature of what is shown in her video. Some people seem to somewhat naively accept the claims in the video as if they are true. I pay more attention to the imagery in the video and I can tell what the video is showing because I have seen it many, many, many times before. For example there is absolutely no question in my mind what this shows (from her video) is camera motion with the three lights tracing lines on the film while the shutter is open.

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/a23a7e0cfe66.jpg[/atsimg]

To the extent any claim in the documentary that this image is not showing that, those claims are simply not credible to me at all. If I was the investigator I'd be like Johnny Carson was with Uri Gellar eliminating the variables for real, and Dorothy wouldn't be able to make images like that one above if the camera was on a tripod. For sure.

But believe what you want. I know some people find some of the claims in that documentary credible, but I don't.

a reply to: The GUT



Best I can do at the moment....You'll have to imagine Tom singing this one with the KLF.....

Lol
No shame.


Article by Leslie Kean interviewing Cris Mellon 05/09/2016 06:09 pm ET ..... our board at UFODATA was privileged to welcome Christopher Mellon as the newest member of our team. 2016

Q: How do you think the press and public will react if Clinton is elected, makes the inquiries she promised, but comes up empty-handed?

A: I think the conspiracy theorists will be angry and unconvinced, while the general public may conclude UFOs are not a worthwhile topic. If Clinton really wants to get to the bottom of the UFO issue, I think she should officially task NORAD with collection and analysis responsibility. Simultaneously, she should assign the Office of Science and Technology Policy the job of reviewing available evidence, coordinating with other countries and providing scientific assessments and recommendations.

Q: Some inside sources have proposed that retrieved hardware from a UFO may exist within a private aerospace company which has become independent from the DoD. In this way, it would be exempt from government oversight and known only to a few people. Do you think this is possible?

A: I find it hard to imagine something as explosive as recovered alien technology remaining under wraps for decades. So while I have no reason to believe there is any recovered alien technology, I will say this: If it were me, and I were trying to bury it deep, I’d take it outside government oversight entirely and place it in a compartment as a new entity within an existing defense company and manage it as what we call an “IRAD” or “Independent Research and Development Activity.”

UFODATA LLC www.ufodata.net...


TTSA CONgressional report language. Could just about be cut n paste from his time before TTSA at UFODATA LLC
Does anyone know if the UFODATA LLC and TTSA are in a JVA?

A. REPORT REQUIRED. – Recent briefings provided to Congress by US military and intelligence personnel raise the possibility that one or more potential US adversaries may have achieved breakthroughs in aerospace engineering that could place US forces at risk. Unfortunately, there is no coherent process within the Executive Branch for collating or analyzing pertinent information on this topic notwithstanding the potential gravity of the issue. Moreover, requests for relevant data to enable Congress to better assess the significance of the issue have not been responded to in a satisfactory manner by DoD or the Intelligence Community. Therefore the Secretary of Defense and Director of National Intelligence shall jointly submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the issue of Anomalous Airborne Threats.

B. ASSESSMENTS.- The report required under subsection (a) shall include the following:

1. A detailed analysis of NORAD’s unknown threat database from January 2004 to the present and correlation of that data with information collected by space-based infrared systems, human intelligence reporting; SIGINT, US Navy intelligence reporting on unidentified craft (both aerospace and undersea) and FBI data derived from investigations of intrusions over restricted US airspace.

2. Identification of a process and a senior official who can be held accountable in the future for ensuring the timely collection and centralized analysis of all Anomalous Airborne Threat reporting regardless of which service or agency acquired the information.

3. Identification of any incidents or patterns that indicate a potential adversary may have achieved breakthrough aerospace capabilities that significantly surpass US capabilities and could put US strategic or conventional forces at risk.
C. RECOMMENDATIONS – The report under subsection (a) above shall include any recommendation for increased collection or research and development deemed appropriate by the Secretary of Defense and Director of National Intelligence.

D. SUBMITTAL DATE- The report under subsection (a) shall be submitted not later than 18 months after enactment of this bill.

dpo.tothestarsacademy.com...

a reply to: The GUT

Yeah, they like studying believers as if they don’t have souls and are trying to steal one or borrow from them

originally posted by: mirageman
a reply to: The GUT

Best I can do at the moment....You'll have to imagine Tom singing this one with the KLF.....

hahaha...great stuff.

1 star for the original (which i haven't heard for many a year) and 1 star for your version...

a reply to: zazzafrazz

This guy mentions that NORAD should study UFOS. My goodness, that’s pretty revealing.
North American Aerospace Defense Command

Umm… maybe they are trying to drum up aliens are attacking us after all.

This organization I mentioned in some other thread is now a mystery since their output of research is a joke and so amateurish judging by their docudrama. So they're NOT really about ufos or uaps at all.
So, this guy says NORAD should investigate as if that will bear any fruit.

So maybe they are doing this to just get the defense budget enhanced

Its all a propaganda effort guided by an arm of the DIA or just the MIC defense conglomerate.

They saw TDL coming and decided to turn him into a conduit for the defense club propaganda outfit.

Maybe mystery solved?

So, when they with a straight face claim they're not into doing disinformation technically they’re telling the truth.
They're actually doing propaganda for the defense establishment using ufos as a flack
At this point, the evidence IMO points to that as being what TTSA is all about.