Shiff will demand to see the Mueller report when it is summited!

AG Bob Barr said James Comey was an ass for pointing out all of the crimes Hillary committed, but saying she shouldn't be indicted.

That made liberals mad, because they want Barr to be like Comey, and share what all Trump did wrong, even though it wasn't indictable.

Look at it this way, what a great campaign commercial it would be to run against an "impeached" president.

originally posted by: theAWfuLWaFFLe
a reply to: Scepticaldem

Question, if Barr decided not to release the full report would you think it should be released for the public to see? I feel even if it is a report that shows no collusion it would behoove our officials to make the report public for the sake of transparency.

“Even if it is a report that shows no collusion”

It is.

a reply to: Guyfriday

Gary Larson? What's the background on him?

People don't realize, just like they don't realize Trump Wall has been under construction since 2017, that:

Schiff (House Intel Committee) has an investigation into Trump ongoing.
Cummings (House Oversight Committee) has an investigation into Trump ongoing.
Waters (House Finance Committee) has an investigation into Trump ongoing.

Pelosi hired a lawyer to coordinate and prioritize the findings of potential "dirt" on President Trump's business, finances, and family dealings...including Trump Jr., Kushner, and Ivanka.

originally posted by: theAWfuLWaFFLe
a reply to: Krakatoa

The investigation will be a cost of $0 thanks to Paul Manafort's asset forfeiture, basically we fronted the cost and are getting reimbursed.

Someone doesn't know how asset forfeiture works... lol

They still haven't finalized the court deal to see if they can keep his homes and personal possessions, much less sell them at auction for pennies on the dollar.

They should have probably done that before the last SC 9-0 ruling on asset forfeiture...

The timing of course is completely coincidental.

Spoiler Alert: Taxpayers are still footing this bill.

originally posted by: Breakthestreak

originally posted by: theAWfuLWaFFLe
a reply to: Scepticaldem

Question, if Barr decided not to release the full report would you think it should be released for the public to see? I feel even if it is a report that shows no collusion it would behoove our officials to make the report public for the sake of transparency.

“Even if it is a report that shows no collusion”

It is.

Collusion by Hillary and Obama? Have you read it yet?

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Guyfriday

Gary Larson? What's the background on him?

People don't realize, just like they don't realize Trump Wall has been under construction since 2017, that:

Schiff (House Intel Committee) has an investigation into Trump ongoing.
Cummings (House Oversight Committee) has an investigation into Trump ongoing.
Waters (House Finance Committee) has an investigation into Trump ongoing.

Pelosi hired a lawyer to coordinate and prioritize the findings of potential "dirt" on President Trump's business, finances, and family dealings...including Trump Jr., Kushner, and Ivanka.

Which is why the joke of Gary Larson (of Far Side fame) prepping the report works. I doubt that those people wanting all these reports will be willing to understand the report, but if the report was done with caricatures of cows and chickens then maybe they will understand that "No-Collusion" means "NO Collusion". Sadly as we already know though, some of those people wanting this don't even understand that "No means NO".

a reply to: Scepticaldem

Rather than creating a Quagmire of Taxpayer
dollars and a legal Spiderweb,
he has to look no further
than his own reflection in the mirror.

Who is funding his agenda?

SAAVY?
S&F

a reply to: Lumenari

You are a very intelligent person,
and a high quality asset to the members
here at ATS.

Rock and Roll!

a reply to: shooterbrody

He understands the old process.
But he clearly does not understand the
New Process.

Special Prosecutor Ken Starr's report on Bill Clinton was 500 pages, and released to the public on 9/11/1998.
www.cnn.com...

Mueller's is probably at least 3 times that big?

a reply to: carewemust

Isn't Mueller a Special Counsel?
Not really the same ?

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Scepticaldem

Can you imagine? The chairman of the HOUSE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE wants a report with classified contents, released to the public, non-redacted!

SCHIFF HAS GONE MAD!

An elected official doing his job and reviewing and releasing pertinent information to the public!? What a crazy idea!

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: carewemust

Isn't Mueller a Special Counsel?
Not really the same ?

Correct..Special Counsel and Special Prosecutor are different animals. How does that matter when it come to reporting their investigative findings? Any idea?

a reply to: Pyle

You're not understanding what Schiff wants to happen. The Chairman of the House Intel Committee is supposed to safeguard sensitive information. Not demand that it be released to the public!

a reply to: carewemust

Yeah VERY different.
Sc reports to the AG only.
The ag decides according to doj rules what to release, if anything.
The doj has established rules for this.

We will see very little other than what has already been charged.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Pyle

You're not understanding what Schiff wants to happen. The Chairman of the House Intel Committee is supposed to safeguard sensitive information. Not demand that it be released to the public!

His job is oversight. If releasing is needed for oversight then he should.

a reply to: shooterbrody

Since Congress oversees the DOJ, it will be interesting to see if Schiff has more "pull" than Devin Nunes did during the 2 years he was head of the House Intel Committee. The DOJ gave him the finger numerous times when he demanded something.

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Pyle

You're not understanding what Schiff wants to happen. The Chairman of the House Intel Committee is supposed to safeguard sensitive information. Not demand that it be released to the public!

His job is oversight. If releasing is needed for oversight then he should.

"Oversight" has more than one meaning 😎

"Deflection" has more than one meaning too 😎

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Pyle

You're not understanding what Schiff wants to happen. The Chairman of the House Intel Committee is supposed to safeguard sensitive information. Not demand that it be released to the public!

His job is oversight. If releasing is needed for oversight then he should.

"Oversight" has more than one meaning 😎

"Deflection" has more than one meaning too 😎

But why are you deflecting? Odd that you are playing interference for a billionaire.