It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The group said Navratilova’s recent assertions in an op-ed she penned for the Sunday Times about trans athletes were “transphobic, based on false understanding of science and data, and [perpetuated] dangerous myths that lead to the ongoing targeting of trans people through discriminatory laws, hateful stereotypes and disproportionate violence.”
The rules on trans athletes reward cheats and punish the innocent. Letting men compete as women simply if they change their name and take hormones is unfair — no matter how those athletes may throw their weight around.
You can’t just proclaim yourself a female and be able to compete against women. There must be some standards, and having a penis and competing as a woman would not fit that standard.
A man can decide to be female, take hormones if required by whatever sporting organization is concerned, win everything in sight and perhaps earn a small fortune, and then reverse his decision and go back to making babies if he so desires. It’s insane and it’s cheating. I am happy to address a transgender woman in whatever form she prefers, but I would not be happy to compete against her. It would not be fair.
Manuel was assigned female at birth, but long struggled with his gender identity, rejecting the many ways society and his family forced him to live as a girl. His mother thought of him as a “tomboy”, but he knew he was different. He didn’t, however, have the basic language to understand his identity and there were simply no role models or media representation to teach him: “I didn’t even know trans men existed.”
originally posted by: Phage
Next thing you know, trans men will be winning pro boxing matches. Dogs and cats, living together.
Manuel was assigned female at birth, but long struggled with his gender identity, rejecting the many ways society and his family forced him to live as a girl. His mother thought of him as a “tomboy”, but he knew he was different. He didn’t, however, have the basic language to understand his identity and there were simply no role models or media representation to teach him: “I didn’t even know trans men existed.”
www.theguardian.com...
originally posted by: Phage
Next thing you know, trans men will be winning pro boxing matches. Dogs and cats, living together.
Manuel was assigned female at birth, but long struggled with his gender identity, rejecting the many ways society and his family forced him to live as a girl. His mother thought of him as a “tomboy”, but he knew he was different. He didn’t, however, have the basic language to understand his identity and there were simply no role models or media representation to teach him: “I didn’t even know trans men existed.”
www.theguardian.com...
originally posted by: JDmOKI
a reply to: Phage
What a dumb argument. So you wanna see M-F in a boxing or Mma match?
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: JDmOKI
I don't watch blood sport, thanks.
Don't really care, actually. Boxing is brutal.
But it's an interesting article, don't you think? A trans man winning against a real man?
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: mobiusmale
What drives me the most crazy is these vague references to science and data, without actually providing the science and data. What drives me the second most crazy is when you get "science and data" from them, the "science" is nothing but half science (psychology....a liberal art, nonscientific study based on subjective analysis) and fringe examples of oddities in nature such as hermaphrodites.