It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: toysforadults
a reply to: zosimov
You are the only person actually making sense in this thread.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: zosimov
Denver 1 spends about $12,000 annually per student. Can you honestly say those kids receive an education in line with that kind of money?
Some of you say "if you can't afford to do it, just move and teach somewhere more affordable". If all the teachers left because they don't earn a living wage, who is going to teach the kids in the entire city of Denver? Should all of the kids just leave too? That isn't a solution, people need to teach.
Denver is going to go way downhill in the very near future, because a lot of people are going to be priced out of it.
originally posted by: JAGStorm
a reply to: narrator
Thank you for chiming in. I love hearing from people that have actually lived it. I considered being a teacher, I was an aid for a year and decided it wasn't for me.
Some of you say "if you can't afford to do it, just move and teach somewhere more affordable". If all the teachers left because they don't earn a living wage, who is going to teach the kids in the entire city of Denver? Should all of the kids just leave too? That isn't a solution, people need to teach.
It is the only solution right now. At least for the smart people. You figured it out.
It's sad, but since the beginning of time migration was a form of survival. Right now it is economic survival.
I've gone to school all over the US and outside of the US. I have some different thoughts on our education problems.
#1 Property taxed based school funding is outdated and doesn't work
#2 School finances should be 100% transparent
#3 I actually don't think we need as many teachers as we have. With all the technology we have now many more course could be taught online or remotely. There are some amazing teachers. What if those top teachers taught remotely to a much larger population? Wouldn't that both save, and help more students. I'm not for 100% remote is most cases, but let's face it, everything is online, kids are on the phone/computer, let's use it.
#4 Schools are way too fancy these days. A Wisconsin school has a gym that rivals top NFL locker rooms with air conditioned shoe locker.
www.si.com...
The only issue I can see with it (and it's a big one), is how are kids going to be supervised while they're "at school" on a computer? Do parents have to fork over money for babysitting while they're at work and their kids are at home? I don't have a solution for that. If we overcome that hurdle, remote teaching is definitely the way to go.